Like OP said, lots of gals who buy "fakes" are buying inspired bags that don't even say "balenciaga" on them. They're buying it because it looks nice. This I think is fine. Aggravating, but I'm a lot more okay with it than those superfake LV's copied down to the last detail.
And here's where a lot of people get their pressure up over nothing.
If someone (who may or may not be able to afford it) buys a bag simply because they like the styling, NOT to be carrying around (and advertising) "name brand X" and passing it off as real, I don't get the big deal.
Now if the person is carrying the bag "perpetrating" like it's real then that's another issue. Honestly, unless you ask them, you'll never know what's in their heart.
some folks buy bags and discard them after a short while. Those same folks don't take care of their bags, care whether they're stored properly, exposed to elements, etc. For them, heck, I'd say go ahead and get a no-name/inspired by. If it's just trash to them after they've worn it, no need in them throwing away good money.
However, for those who do care for their bags, keep them long time, treat them as investments, etc...then the bag IS an investment.
I'm even shocked at the speed by which some here buy a bag, wear it for whatever period, then sell it.
I tend to keep my bags a bit more long term.
It's only after periodic pruning in my closet that I'll evaluate things that I haven't worn/used much and then discard (sell) it.
I've got no-name bags that I bought simply for the style...and I've got "brand name" that I bought for the same reason. I like them just the same, not because it makes me feel extra special...but simply because I'm satisfied with the bag.
My newest acquisition is coming to me in the mail: a
Coach Andrea in cognac. It's probably been out for a while, but I just ran across it and I LOVED the style, not because it's Coach.