angelicdust, you're correct in saying that daddy's money did not make consumers buy her products. As in my last post, this was shown to be obvious since her company did not succeed whatsoever here in the good ol' US of A.
evilvietgirl, I agree with you also. Some people's families are never going to teach their children how to stand on their own two feet. My family is well-off too (of course, not multi-bazillionaires like her daddy though
), but my parents still make me have a job to pay for the things I want to have (i.e. nice purses!!!!) and the things I want to do (i.e. spring break vacations, eating sushi everyday, going to clubs, etc.). So, I think why people are "criticizing" her for the use of her daddy's money is that it is not an effective, positive way in raising your child. Even Ivanka ***** has to work her butt off for her dad to earn her position, wealth, and power. It's okay for parents to jump-start their children's futures (like paying for college tuition, which is what my parents and many others' do), so maybe the dad should have said, "Hey, how about I pay for you to go to fashion school. Then, you can get an internship with a designer and work your way up!"
The bottom line is, most people here think her designs are
I'm sure a few of us have seen better or know someone who can design much better than this, but just do not have the startup capital like she did.
I mean, take Paris Hilton for example. Do you really think she can sing? Or do you think that her money helped her start up her own "record label," Heiress Records. This, in turn, allowed her to do whatever she pleased to showcase her "talent." Or lack of...