Your post is typical of those made either by sellers who've been caught selling fakes or by someone with an "agenda."
Anyone can google and do the same "research" you did. And if you did further "research," you'd find that those same people who claim tPF supports its members selling fakes are the same ones who came here to defend their fake listings. Those are the people who post such nonsense and it's their sock puppets who believe everything they read.
And since you've only done part of your research, I recommend you also google some of the reputable stores you patronize and see that they, too have had allegations of fake bags. Some have been falsely accused while others were victims themselves of dishonest buyers.
One thing your post does is to confirm why it's never recommended that buyers take their items to stores for "authentication." Most of the time, SAs are wrong. They aren't qualified, trained or even allowed to authenticate.
Noted that you didn't respond to the fact that your own authenticators called out some of the bags being sold by forum members on tPF's site are selling fakes or why your "authenticators" labeled the bag I bought at Saks as a fake...your response was simply misdirection. I believe that there are some very knowledgeable people on this site however, I also have been proven correct that just because it's on tPF doesn't make it accurate or gospel. My point in all of this is that for a group that claims to be consumer advocates, it seems like a conflict of interest when your experts are attempting to discredited other selling platforms at the same time promoting their own businesses. It's a shame because I think the intent of the site is good but the execution has fallen by the way-side. You cannot at least acknowledge that there is the same ratio of dishonesty on this site as any other selling medium. Would be an interesting "internal audit"...