What’s your unpopular LV opinion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MagpieInTraining
  • Start date Start date

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Which brings me to my point of my unpopular opinion about how I hate those organizers in LV bags, such as Speedy, Neverfull, etc. Why spend so much money for a bag, only to turn around and put a cheap, non-LV item inside of it just so your wallet is in a certain place? It just cheapens it, as well as only adds one more item to put in your bag.

I have the Speedy 40 and love the openness of it. But then again, I don't have 50 slgs that I carry either, so I can find what I need without a problem.

Please don't hate me :heart:
I don't get the organizers. I have slgs of various sizes so I can reach in and know what I am pulling out quickly. I carry less than 10 slgs at any given time though.
 
The world tour editions are lazy and money grabbing items. Very restrictive in where you can have the stickers, how many you can have and what stickers are actually available. The choice of colours is limited too and overall they lack the truly personal touch of the heritage mon mono items where you get to choose more options. Also its cheeky to call it world tour when for a lot of the items you can only get one world destination stamp. Hardly a tour with only one stop.
 
Last edited:
The world tour editions are lazy and money grabbing items. Very restrictive in where you can have the stickers, how many you can have and what stickers are actually available. The choice of colours is limited too and overall they lack the truly personal touch of the heritage mon mono items where you get to choose more options. Also its cheeky to call it world tour when for a lot of the items you can only get one world destination stamp. Hardly a tour with only one stop.

I agree. Some of those designs are outdated, even ridiculous ... A Grand Torino ? Alien ? Green tube of lipstick ? Multiple outer space stickers ?? Even the countries & cities are sooo limited, more choices should be offered. These should be updated seasonally.
 
Omg you said it and now i cant unsee it!! It does look like a gym bag :facepalm:

Audrey Hepburn popularised the Speedy, so it can't be all bad...but I don't have one nor want one. Too annoying a shape.

Edit: I just realised Audrey Hepburn was very thin and flat chested, so wearing a curved bag like the Speedy would have been a nice contrast. Good styling.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: baghabitz34
All of these.

I don’t understand all the obsession with SLG’s all of a sudden, when I was active on TPF no one would bat an eye at a mini pochette or pochette cles. Must be a result of LV creating a sense of scarcity.

I don’t like the Pochette Métis because it’s a lesser version of the Monceau which is more square and MORE briefcase like, so we dislike the Pochette Métis for different reasons!

I actually don’t consider the Neverfull an iconic bag...the Speedy is an icon but the Neverfull was released what...2007? I think its popularity is partially because it’s an easy to use tote that fits into many people’s budget. I have a Catogram Neverfull and love it, but I would never own a plain Neverfull. It’s really not me. But cats are me, so the Catogram Neverfull is a natural fit :biggrin:

Another potentially unpopular opinion: LV should stick to canvas. It’s what it’s known for. I just wouldn’t spend the kind of $$ required to buy a Capucines (For example, which I do not like), but I would buy a Petite Malle or petite Boite Chapeau.

LV Twist - not a fan at all and no idea why people like the weird closure which doesn’t even remind me of LV.

I hope we remain respectful of each other though - totally OK if you are fans of any or all of th e above and find what I love appalling! :biggrin:

LV are doing the opposite! They're reducing production of canvas and trying to squeeze LV lovers into leather and more expensive bags.
They're trying to compete with Chanel and Hermes and the best way to do it is via artificial scarcity.

It annoys the heck out of me. Hanging onto a 1999 Alma and getting new strap in a contrasting colour. Damn them!

My peeve?
People who nurse the vachetta and expect it to remain the same as when they bought it! They're so perfectionist and obsessed they use baby wipes, white erasers etc not realising the pH can and usually will, destroy the bonds of the leather over time.
And for what?

The vachetta is designed to develop a patina over time. It's just ignorant and ridiculous to expect the vachetta to remain a pinky brown and the edges to remain red. The vachetta changes to a honey colour and goes even darker colour over time, and the edges change to a brown. Don't fight nature, it's ridiculous and controlling plus worst of all, you'll destroy the bag!

Boring can be good, the Alma is such a basic bag but you can jazz it up easily.

It was ordered originally by Chanel, that's why it's so perfect and timeless; they asked her if they could keep the design and she said yes.
I used to think the monogram was flashy and when everyone got one I relegated it to the back of the wardrobe, but now... I'm past caring.
I'm going to get several different colours like hot pink, lime green for the strap not caring if they're not LV and just wear it proudly. I'm not going to be bound by what LV produce. They do have a pink but it's lame.
Gucci dare I say it, is more adventurous and cater for the youth market. IMO.
 
I agree with this. Unintended consequences. I would also say that their lack of availability of products is also pushing their customers towards other designers. That's how I got into other designers for sure.

Agreed. Finally bought some YSL pieces because I don't want to play the availability game sometimes
 
I hate the phrase "makes your/my heart sing". When I first heard it on Minks4All's channel on Youtube, it was fine. But now I see it everywhere and it just feels like people are just mimicking influencers and it actually makes me feel a little cringey whenever I read/hear it.

Almost all the colorful things LV has put out recently looks terrible and tacky. Purple and lime green? Who thought that was a good idea?

I don't understand when people try to make a bag into something it's not. Like putting straps on pouches that do not have D-rings for them in attempt to make it an over the shoulder or crossbody bag. Isn't that just annoying when you need to open the bag and you have to worry about it slipping off the chain?

Well I haven't done this, but I can see the attraction.
In any case, it can be easily fixed with two leather loops inside the bag. This will stop the chain slipping off. People innovate and that's ok.
Not for me I'm older.

I'm a fan of fluoro colours to brighten up a bag. If you're young why not? It's street fashion after all and fashion has become more street based. Virgil has led this. It's not a bad thing.
 
Last edited:
@daisy913
I don’t think NG has anything to do with pricing.

Also NG may have had a strict brief.
A genius for reinterpretation of a brand is demonstrated by Karl Lagerfeld at Chanel and Fendi,
and Tom Ford at Gucci.

They didn't wipe the slate clean and do what they liked entirely.
That said TF hates brown and was much more slick than Gucci had ever had.
TF won the right to do what he wanted because Gucci was on the verge of bankruptcy so nobody noticed, and when they did he was absolutely killing it. He presided over a brand revolution but he was still true to the brand.

There would be tight controls on creativity usually. Accessories are the bread and butter of fashion, because bags in particular are not difficult to size.

I think Virgil was doing interesting stuff and I was moved by his final collection. He has revolutionised inclusion of colour and white conservatives might not like it but it's the way of the future. IMO.
 
My unpopular opinion is that the quality control IS going down.

I’m not the type to pick apart my bags but last year I received 3 different items that arrived broken. I’m not taking about a bump in the canvas or other nonsense.

I don’t know how they even made it into a box and were shipped. Mistakes happen but 3 times in a short period is a bit much. I should mention that they were 3 different items. And I’ve read other posts about it as well, which I believe.

I guess what I really don’t understand is why they keep letting it happen? Surely, it must cost LV more for exchanges (return shipping, man power to restock or check over items) then to just double check items before shipping.

Anyway, that’s my unpopular opinion.
Quality.
This is one reason why people are going for vintage/pre-loved/USED...lol!
And another reason to hang onto your classics.
 
That it is uneducated folly that LV’s elegant, tough, spectacularly designed bags with vachetta leather need to be babied. Vachetta leather was specifically applied to the wear edges and stress points of canvas covered trunks in order to withstand the abuse of the elements and vicissitudes of travel. These bags were tied to open carriages, covered with road dust, rain and snow, stacked at wharf side and loaded into dank, dark holds of ocean-crossing ships sometimes for months at a time. They were toted by the world’s greatest explorers and adventurers—by train and barge and pack mules.

And yet somehow, 165 years later, fashionistas barely out of diapers have decided that Mr. Vuitton, having created a marvel of a lightweight, virtually indestructible bag (which is unduplicated to this day) had no idea what he was doing. They have invented the notion that vachetta is “delicate” and “you must be careful with it.“ Because they value nothing that shows any sign of having actually been used for a practical purpose, they believe ideal vachetta must never lose its perfect pale newness or have dust or spots or scratches. The pervasiveness of this nonsense has pressured LV to remove the protective vachetta from the wear points of many designs rendering them useless for those of us who want to carry anything other than three tubes of lip gloss. And then these same people who won’t buy a bag with vachetta, are shocked and dismayed when their canvas bag wears on the corners and stress points. They feel betrayed and duped that a bag that LV could at one time repair (by replacing the leather) can no longer be repaired because there is none. :facepalm:

THIS!!!!

ROFL (well.... I nearly am!)

It's just pig ignorant. Worse are the number crunchers at LV who instead of educating the twits, are being dictated by them. This will revert back when they have run out of gimmicks.
 
Even if I am guilty of preferring light color vacchetta to darker one, but yes you are absolutely right! I needed a smile and a refresher slap regarding the above. Thank you for your post! :heart::tup:

I even was patronised by a former LV SA who tried to tell ME about vachetta!
What she tried to tell me was that it should be light coloured pink!!
The twit.

I wasn't carrying an LV, it was a Celine but it did have vachetta which was indeed darker from having been used in real life!!!

I don't know if I can adequately convey how annoying this person was.
 
Top