What are some of your unpopular Chanel opinions?

[Coach Superfan]

I haven’t yet seen it in person but from what I’ve seen, I also do not like the look of it. Rose gold jewellery I have sits between white gold and yellow gold in terms of warmth. This is so pink that it looks weird!

Yes, I think it's this. I typically like Rose gold jewelry elsewhere, but on Chanel bags i don't think it belongs. I've always considered Chanel classic and timeless and the rose gold is too trendy. It might look better (yet still trendy) on a pink bag.

 

[OCMomof3]

Well now I am seeing the chains and twilly on the Chanel No5 bucket of shower pods. Like really?! Ummm...NOPE!

That's really something. But honestly, not everyone has the budget for Chanel. The packaging is super cute and collectible, though the amount of paper used (vs, for example, using metal for the bucket) is pretty crummy given the price tag. I had to talk myself out of these items because I don't care for N5 and would be buying just for packaging!

 

[Kitties Are Cute]

Could it also be some people like the micro bag trend and they don’t purchase one because they can’t afford a larger bag? Everyone is entitled to their opinion but it seems like your judging people when you say what you said. Take a look at Arisajoylife on Instagram. She has an enviable and extensive collection of Chanel and Dior, yet it appears her favorite bag to carry is a gold mini vanity. I doubt she bought it so she can “say she has a Chanel bag.” I just bought a fuschia velvet coin bag because I saw it and loved it when the Metiers collection was shown. I didn’t buy it because I can’t afford a bigger bag. I bought it because it’s unique and I love it and it’s a perfect accessory for the holidays. Anyway. Have a lovely weekend.

Yes some people can buy it because they actually like it. Bigger sizes do not mean better - I prefer a small or medium classic flap over jumbo any day. But it’s hard for me to believe someone would want to spend thousands of dollars on something so tiny it barely carries anything. Giving it a strap does give it a more bag-like quality than if it didn’t and thus makes it more desirable in my opinion.

I’m just a rando stranger on the internet you’ll never meet, no need to take anything I say seriously or personally. If you like it and know why you do, then what I say matters absolutely zero.

 

[sjofaye]

Yes, I think it's this. I typically like Rose gold jewelry elsewhere, but on Chanel bags i don't think it belongs. I've always considered Chanel classic and timeless and the rose gold is too trendy. It might look better (yet still trendy) on a pink bag.

I agree, I think rose gold is beautiful but something about the rose gold on the classic flap that doesn't look right to me. It seems out of place. Maybe its the tone of it, I feel like a lighter rose gold would look better, something similar to LGHW, but not on the classic flap in black.

 

[Sandisis]

Unpopular opinion: I don't like classic flaps. They're just overpriced bags to be honest. Sure, the aesthetic is there but it's not exclusive anymore. Every Chanel lover that I know owns a black classic flap so no, they are not exclusive. If you look at Fashionphile, there are so many and there are so many fakes. At some point, the preloved market will be saturated and hence, no one can justify them as an "investment piece." It's ironic since some Chanel lovers think the LV Neverfull is everywhere. Ummm, fake classic flaps are also very common so I would rather buy a seasonal flap. I think some seasonal flaps are more beautiful and feels more excusive since when they're gone, they're gone.

I so agree with you . That’s why I sold my classic flap bought year 2020 . It’s so common everywhere , I don’t reach out to classic flap at all . Spending so much , yet carrying same bag with so many every time . And so many fakes . For those that think classic flap is an investments pcs, yes unless you don’t sell it . If you plan to sell it , make sure condition is as new to fetch a good price . Chanel came up with this moi programm which give the bag a 5 years warrently . How much do u think your preload classic flap will worth now if you don’t have this new moi program

 

[Clb09]

1. Chanel shoes, or luxury shoes for that matter, why anyone would spend $1000+ for shoes is beyond me as wear and tear on them is instant. Chanel sneakers/runners in particular...the styles are exactly the same as others but just because a CC is slapped on, instantly the price jumps 10x!
2. Twilly - I just don't get the point of them, wrapping them around a top handle and while it protects the handle, but the detail of the printed twilly is all lost because it's all twisted up.
3. Costume jewelry - everyone complains about the quality of the stones falling out or metal tarnishing yet still keep on buying them.
4. I don't like the trendy CC, the accordion style of the bag doesn't make sense from a storage, while organized but can't store properly.
5. Deauville totes in fabric, for the price it is, it makes absolutely no sense to purchase. This comment applies to all tote bags these days that have a giant brand name across, and stupid wording like the MJ one call "Tote Bag" right across, as if we don't know it's a tote bag. It seems that it's just a show off on who can purchase the most expensive tote bag to go grocery shopping?!
6. CC long wallets - who carries long wallets these days still with most cards being stored on phone. Gone are the days of carrying 20 reward cards! I get it with carrying cash still as some places still is cash only.

 

[sweetpea_2009]

I'm not sure if this is the right thread to even post this to but I'm certain this will be an unpopular opinion/post. I've read many threads and comments on this topic and wanted to add my 2 cent's worth to it. Take it with a grain of salt or leave it. No judgment just my thoughts. I can't seem to wrap my head around this notion of moving away from Chanel or selling off CFs because they are too "common". What is this notion of common? Is there some magic formula that makes something common based on the number of items produced/purchased? There are around 7.8 billion people on this planet. I'd be shocked if 1% of the population had a Chanel bag or CF. It's more likely that the car you're driving (unless you're uber wealthy rocking a Rolls-Royce Phantom) or the jeans or shoes you're wearing are more "common" than a Chanel. Do people feel the same way about the vehicles they purchase or their clothes/shoes? That they are too common? Many things are common. I buy what I like and what appeals to me and fits my style and lifestyle. I couldn't care less about who else has it or how many people on this planet have it. I don't have the time nor energy. If I saw 4 people out and about with a Chanel bag I'd think "those 4 have great taste". I'm not thinking "4 of the 4 00 people I came into contact with today have a Chanel bag. It doesn't feel special anymore".

 

[CrazyCool01]

I'm not sure if this is the right thread to even post this to but I'm certain this will be an unpopular opinion/post. I've read many threads and comments on this topic and wanted to add my 2 cent's worth to it. Take it with a grain of salt or leave it. No judgment just my thoughts. I can't seem to wrap my head around this notion of moving away from Chanel or selling off CFs because they are too "common". What is this notion of common? Is there some magic formula that makes something common based on the number of items produced/purchased? There are around 7.8 billion people on this planet. I'd be shocked if 1% of the population had a Chanel bag or CF. It's more likely that the car you're driving (unless you're uber wealthy rocking a Rolls-Royce Phantom) or the jeans or shoes you're wearing are more "common" than a Chanel. Do people feel the same way about the vehicles they purchase or their clothes/shoes? That they are too common? Many things are common. I buy what I like and what appeals to me and fits my style and lifestyle. I couldn't care less about who else has it or how many people on this planet have it. I don't have the time nor energy. If I saw 4 people out and about with a Chanel bag I'd think "those 4 have great taste". I'm not thinking "4 of the 4 00 people I came into contact with today have a Chanel bag. It doesn't feel special anymore".

Just my opinion - i think Chanel classic flaps are too common compared to birkin/kelly . We might not see as many on streets.

many of us, TPFrs have so many Classic flaps in our collection most of them dont use their flaps but love to collect.

 

[NavyRisa]

I'm not sure if this is the right thread to even post this to but I'm certain this will be an unpopular opinion/post. I've read many threads and comments on this topic and wanted to add my 2 cent's worth to it. Take it with a grain of salt or leave it. No judgment just my thoughts. I can't seem to wrap my head around this notion of moving away from Chanel or selling off CFs because they are too "common". What is this notion of common? Is there some magic formula that makes something common based on the number of items produced/purchased? There are around 7.8 billion people on this planet. I'd be shocked if 1% of the population had a Chanel bag or CF. It's more likely that the car you're driving (unless you're uber wealthy rocking a Rolls-Royce Phantom) or the jeans or shoes you're wearing are more "common" than a Chanel. Do people feel the same way about the vehicles they purchase or their clothes/shoes? That they are too common? Many things are common. I buy what I like and what appeals to me and fits my style and lifestyle. I couldn't care less about who else has it or how many people on this planet have it. I don't have the time nor energy. If I saw 4 people out and about with a Chanel bag I'd think "those 4 have great taste". I'm not thinking "4 of the 4 00 people I came into contact with today have a Chanel bag. It doesn't feel special anymore".

Well said.

 

[OCMomof3]

I'm not sure if this is the right thread to even post this to but I'm certain this will be an unpopular opinion/post. I've read many threads and comments on this topic and wanted to add my 2 cent's worth to it. Take it with a grain of salt or leave it. No judgment just my thoughts. I can't seem to wrap my head around this notion of moving away from Chanel or selling off CFs because they are too "common". What is this notion of common? Is there some magic formula that makes something common based on the number of items produced/purchased? There are around 7.8 billion people on this planet. I'd be shocked if 1% of the population had a Chanel bag or CF. It's more likely that the car you're driving (unless you're uber wealthy rocking a Rolls-Royce Phantom) or the jeans or shoes you're wearing are more "common" than a Chanel. Do people feel the same way about the vehicles they purchase or their clothes/shoes? That they are too common? Many things are common. I buy what I like and what appeals to me and fits my style and lifestyle. I couldn't care less about who else has it or how many people on this planet have it. I don't have the time nor energy. If I saw 4 people out and about with a Chanel bag I'd think "those 4 have great taste". I'm not thinking "4 of the 4 00 people I came into contact with today have a Chanel bag. It doesn't feel special anymore".

1000% agree.

 

[sweetpea_2009]

Just my opinion - i think Chanel classic flaps are too common compared to birkin/kelly . We might not see as many on streets.

many of us, TPFrs have so many Classic flaps in our collection most of them dont use their flaps but love to collect.

I would agree that you'd see more Chanels than Hermes based on the price point although Chanel seems like they want to change that. I guess I'm just wondering why people care so much about how many other people have the same brand bag they have but don't seem to care how many other people drive the same make/model car they drive or wear the same brand clothes, shoes, watch, jewelry, socks, under garments, etc. Will people stop buying/wearing lululemon because so many others wear it? Or maybe the same people also care about the other things I just listed out. Chasing exclusivity seems exhausting to me.

 

[lala_retro]

Well now I am seeing the chains and twilly on the Chanel No5 bucket of shower pods. Like really?! Ummm...NOPE!

apparently people are also putting chains on the shower tablet tin and wearing it like a bag.

I think the craze over the factory 5 repurpose-able items (shower gel can, bath tablet tin, water bottle) are mostly with people that otherwise don't own a lot of Chanel items, though there are certainly long time clients who just love everything Chanel. The ironic thing is it's a lot easier for regular fashion clients to get those items, but those are also the clients that don't seem to really care whether or not they get a water bottle that says Chanel on it.

 

[AChanelADay]

I'm not sure if this is the right thread to even post this to but I'm certain this will be an unpopular opinion/post. I've read many threads and comments on this topic and wanted to add my 2 cent's worth to it. Take it with a grain of salt or leave it. No judgment just my thoughts. I can't seem to wrap my head around this notion of moving away from Chanel or selling off CFs because they are too "common". What is this notion of common? Is there some magic formula that makes something common based on the number of items produced/purchased? There are around 7.8 billion people on this planet. I'd be shocked if 1% of the population had a Chanel bag or CF. It's more likely that the car you're driving (unless you're uber wealthy rocking a Rolls-Royce Phantom) or the jeans or shoes you're wearing are more "common" than a Chanel. Do people feel the same way about the vehicles they purchase or their clothes/shoes? That they are too common? Many things are common. I buy what I like and what appeals to me and fits my style and lifestyle. I couldn't care less about who else has it or how many people on this planet have it. I don't have the time nor energy. If I saw 4 people out and about with a Chanel bag I'd think "those 4 have great taste". I'm not thinking "4 of the 4 00 people I came into contact with today have a Chanel bag. It doesn't feel special anymore".

I don't get it either
I always ask these people where they live.
I barely saw Chanel everywhere in Paris.

 

[sweetpea_2009]

I don't get it either
I always ask these people where they live.
I barely saw Chanel everywhere in Paris.

I feel like I see it more online than actually in person. So many "influencers" have Chanel bags. It's overwhelming. This whole social media influencer thing is interesting to me (YouTube, Instagram, Pinterest, etc.). People love to follow and rely on these influencers for knowing what's hot. But crazy thing is that millions of other people are also following the same influencers too. People all rush out to get whatever the person they follow says is hot. And before long that whatever becomes "common" in some people's eyes and therefore less exclusive. To me it's a vicious cycle.

 

[AChanelADay]

I feel like I see it more online than actually in person. So many "influencers" have Chanel bags. It's overwhelming. This whole social media influencer thing is interesting to me (YouTube, Instagram, Pinterest, etc.). People love to follow and rely on these influencers for knowing what's hot. But crazy thing is that millions of other people are also following the same influencers too. People all rush out to get whatever the person they follow says is hot. And before long that whatever becomes "common" in some people's eyes and therefore less exclusive. To me it's a vicious cycle.

Which is why I think those people's claims are silly.The internet is not the real world