What you say is certainly very true, however, I would urge - no, I would plead with anyone considering parenthood who is of the opinion, and plans, to provide their child with only what the "law requires" so to speak, to reconsider the question of parenthood.
There are certainly parents who are hard-pressed to afford even the basics for their kids, and if that is the case, I would make the same suggestion to them.
The idea of raising a child, and never giving it anything more than a roof and food, and I presume some sort of clothing, in communities where nudity would also involve some legal issues, as well as communities where temperatures drop in winter, seems to me to be so highly distasteful and beyond sad that I have to say something.
The whole point of being a parent is love, and we want to give those we love all we can give them. Even if we are poor, we will strive to provide some "luxuries," because those are not luxuries - those are what separates parents - or people who love us in general - from underfunded state-run institutions featured in scandal-and-expose pieces on 20/20 - or those found in Charles Dickens novels. Or prisons.
In my opinion, people who would be OK with providing a child with only the necessities of life, quite aside from the question of their financial means, would do well to consider just why they wish to have children.
This is not to say that in order to be a good parent, one must comply with a child's every desire. On the contrary, the best parents, in my view, deliberately do NOT do that, even though they might have no trouble doing so financially. It is good for children to learn all those cliches about money not growing on trees, and cutting lawns to pay for the expensive gadget, etc, but there is a FAR cry between giving the child any and everything he ever wants and considering that once one has provided the basics of survival, that one's obligation is done, and the child will get that and nothing more!
There is much to be said for moderation, whether the subject is indulging the desires of children or choosing how many cocktails one will enjoy before dinner, but there is even more to be said for love, because people who are suited to be parents will be motivated first, last, and in between, by love, and it will be love that drives them to provide what little luxuries and fun they can, even if it is not the costly and glittering thing that the rich child has, and it is love that will prevent the wealthy parent from instantly providing each and every thing that the child wants!
And lara is correct that this is not really socalchk's issue, and I do not mean to hijack the thread, but something about that comment just grabbed me, and I could not sit on my fingers!
:back2topic:
Sorry, Shimma, I didn't mean to insinuate that one should toss their child in a box with food and a rag for covering themselves-LOL! Can you tell I'm not the maternal type?
I was more thinking along the lines that the OP said, "She's not the working type and is used to everything being handed to her." (LOL, who is the working type? It's just something we all have to do.) and then proceeded to list all the excess stuff her parents won't buy her. I've been paying my own way since I was 18 and working since I was 12, I don't consider that a tragedy or poor parenting to expect your kid to pay for some of their own stuff especially costly stuff like prom.
But Yes, I do agree that's a side issue to the verbal stuff. I think the OP and her sister should approach their parents together and tell them how upset hearing that stuff makes them feel. Maybe saying it everytime Mom and Dad say those things will drive the point home. Sometimes people don't realize who they're ranting to & how it makes the other person feel.