Sorry, Mebagaholic, I would have to take back my previous comment, ’If it’s my bag, I would believe the leather was original’.
Please don’t be alarmed, I’ve realized I have to be cautious of what I say. What I post out will stay on this thread forever, Haha!
Honestly, without seeing and handling your bag in person, I can‘t guarantee 100% that she hasn’t been redyed. I can only say, from the images, I can not find any evidence of your bag being re-dyed, especially by a spray gun.
Some leather dye is not that heavy, it won’t leave much residue on the stitches and the pierces. One layer of it on the leather can hardly be visible, especially on photos.
Thinking back in Sept 2020 on this thread, I had mistake once, I thought that beige color bag was in original leather, yet phish fan said her bag was re-dyed. Then days later, I enlarged her photos, I found traces of evidence, the bag was re-dyed.
Therefore, I’m showing you photos to tell you what to look for with the best of my knowledge.
If you go back to see phishfan’s post on page 2 of this thread. Look closely on the second photo posted. Do you see traces of paint residue on the stitches close to the CC logo?
Examine the stitching pierces, they’re not the same in size. Some are smaller, covered with paint residue.
Attached is a photo of a professionally done re-colored Reissue from the Restory website,
https://www.the-restory.com/2018-4-7-re-colouring-a-chanel-bjpy5/.
Look into this photo in detail, do you see paint residue on the stitching pierces too? I wonder if they would clean up the stitching pearces before shipping back to the owner since those stitches are bigger in this bag.
According to the description on the website, that leather has been put on three layers of paint. When leather is covered with thicker layer of paint, it’s very easy to tell it has been repainted.
What has made you suspect your bag had been re-dyed in the beginning?
View attachment 5286018