*update* wedding band swap all done, pics pg 14
- Thread starter ame
- Start date
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Ill be pressing them for Flyer to rush it. I am SO sick of this waiting. This week was the "drop dead" I told that idiot I needed it done by way back in early June (im a moron for even saying anything!) because I am going out of town to a wedding. Sure enough look what happened.
So I got home and here's a few pics. I wasn;t smart enough for a "side view" or to copy the same handshot from last time...
The stones are the same size as the other, the difference is the way they're set. And if we lower the other one, it won't look as wide as it is. The metal comes out on that.
So heres the new one, with a side by side of the one from last week which is on the left. New on the right.
This is 1.9 mm wide. What are your thoughts?
The stones are the same size as the other, the difference is the way they're set. And if we lower the other one, it won't look as wide as it is. The metal comes out on that.
So heres the new one, with a side by side of the one from last week which is on the left. New on the right.
This is 1.9 mm wide. What are your thoughts?
Attachments
Wow, you look super tan! I love the new golden glow! Anyway, back to the band. I think it looks much better. . .it doesn't stick out as much as is less metaly. It also fits better against your e-ring. I think they did a good job - was this what you were looking for? But it doesn't really matter what I think, the big question is, are you happy with it??
HAH I am NOT tan. That is just weird iPhone somethingorother.
I am going with it, just a few less stones AND in my size. I had her wear it and we looked at it in a mirror reflection. At first I was NOT happy with the width. But as I wore it I liked it more. It's not as wide as I wanted but it definitely doesnt' take away from the e-ring like the rest seemed to.
I am going with it, just a few less stones AND in my size. I had her wear it and we looked at it in a mirror reflection. At first I was NOT happy with the width. But as I wore it I liked it more. It's not as wide as I wanted but it definitely doesnt' take away from the e-ring like the rest seemed to.
HmmmMM the one from last week vs the one today.... maybe it's the way it is set but i can tell that since it's lower, the width is just a SMIDGE smaller than your ering band? Or is that my imagination.
I like the width of the left picture but the setting on the right.... but it's hard to tell because the lighting is different in both so I can't be 100% sure I know what i'm seeing...
Is a spacer needed? That might slightly change the proportions too. Does it touch your solitaire head?
I like the width of the left picture but the setting on the right.... but it's hard to tell because the lighting is different in both so I can't be 100% sure I know what i'm seeing...
Is a spacer needed? That might slightly change the proportions too. Does it touch your solitaire head?
It didn't seem to do a lot of touching. I decided if it did Id get a spacer or keep wearing my plain one.
This one is 1.9. The one from the other day is 2.1, but the stones are set the same way and are the same exact size. The height of the 2.1 band from last week allows the bottom of the band where it touches my finger to be wider which is why it looks wider overal.
This one is 1.9. The one from the other day is 2.1, but the stones are set the same way and are the same exact size. The height of the 2.1 band from last week allows the bottom of the band where it touches my finger to be wider which is why it looks wider overal.
Either way is a variance actually. Neither is a perfect match for the ering. They couldn't commit to us that if they made the other lower it would work, and I asked if this can be made a hair wider, and the jeweler said he would ask what that would entail. I don't want a whole cad cam mess. I just want it as close to stock as possible and as close to the same width as possible.