The RealReal

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I was only offered store credit for a bag that was significantly not as described. The minimal pictures they had didn’t capture the damage that the bag had and the description didn’t mention it either. As Yoshi mentioned, unless you are certain, I would not risk it.
Did you take photos of the damage and send them?
I've only ordered a bag from there twice and one time the bag was in a poor shape, but once I've sent photos they've allowed me a return. That was about two months ago.
 
Did you take photos of the damage and send them?
I've only ordered a bag from there twice and one time the bag was in a poor shape, but once I've sent photos they've allowed me a return. That was about two months ago.
I have not purchased yet. I'm just looking and have a few possibilities. However, as someone pointed out- their pictures are not very good. And, the descriptions not very good either. Someone's "light" damage may be someone else's "moderate" to "heavy" damage or wear. I have no idea why they don't take pictures of any potential problems. Obviously, it takes more time, and, sometimes the damage or problem doesn't show well on camera. But, it would probably take care of many of the questions potential buyers may have.
 
I am looking for a pre-owned bag on the therealreal. Their bags are supposedly non-returnable. Has anyone had an experience where they received a bag that was not as described and were able to send it back and get your money back? TIA!
I just received an item from them today that was supposedly final sale but it had flaws that were not disclosed. It took just a brief exchange on their live chat to get a return authorized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loganz and ronnie20
Did you take photos of the damage and send them?
I've only ordered a bag from there twice and one time the bag was in a poor shape, but once I've sent photos they've allowed me a return. That was about two months ago.
I did. They still only offered store credit. After receiving the returned bag from me, they reposted the bag with exactly the same description as before, not disclosing the damage.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Bubach
I am looking for a pre-owned bag on the therealreal. Their bags are supposedly non-returnable. Has anyone had an experience where they received a bag that was not as described and were able to send it back and get your money back? TIA!
I sent back two bags that were believed by me to be inauthentic, and one of which was also not as described (color). I received refunds on each purchase within 3 business days of the bags being received back at their facility. One of these was a Birkin.
I had to provide photos of why I believed the bags to be fake and in the instance of the birkin I did that and then also showed how the color was not black but instead a very deep navy blue.
 
I did. They still only offered store credit. After receiving the returned bag from me, they reposted the bag with exactly the same description as before, not disclosing the damage.
Yeah they do this with clothes as well. I had quite a few cases when clothes would have damages or wrong measurements in the description. But they would always take those back (even though they were listed as final sale) once I've sent photos. And they would always relist them without disclosing the damages or updating the measurements.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Loganz
Yeah they do this with clothes as well. I had quite a few cases when clothes would have damages or wrong measurements in the description. But they would always take those back (even though they were listed as final sale) once I've sent photos. And they would always relist them without disclosing the damages or updating the measurements.
Isn't this ridiculous? They 100% put back items that are clearly damaged, with inaccurate descriptions, and sometimes FAKE.

I defend their refund process because they do that, and relatively quickly; but I cannot defend their listing process, auth process, or quality control
 
  • Like
Reactions: QuelleFromage
Isn't this ridiculous? They 100% put back items that are clearly damaged, with inaccurate descriptions, and sometimes FAKE.

I defend their refund process because they do that, and relatively quickly; but I cannot defend their listing process, auth process, or quality control
I agree, it is ridiculous. I don't understand how this can be a good business move to keep reselling misrepresented item rather than fixing the listing description (or removing it if it is fake). Customer support people costs money and return labels cost money so if they keep doing this it must mean that on average people do not bother to return such items. I don't see other explanation tbh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loganz
Hi Muchstuff! I hope you are well!

I do not understand either. Yes, I called my credit card institution and they advised me to not close the dispute as they would lose the rights to fight the case on my behalf.

The thing is, I have no problem closing it, but I do not trust them to give me the refund because of how unclear a lot of the associates have been. Like giving me different answers, giving the wrong information to UPS, not contacting me within the timeframe they promised they would, etc.

I am waiting for a followup from their next level management to see if they can guarantee me my refund, then I will be happy to close the dispute.

Thank you for your advice!!!
It maybe hurtful to a business received a charge back, but in such case since you had already filed charge back, I would say it's probably better just stick with it, let your bank refund you.
 
TRR does not have my undying support, lol. I find their authentications are sometimes rushed, fakes get through, damages are not disclosed, etc. However, they are not sketchy, or shady, they are after all a publicly traded company who must comply with basic rules and regulations for customer support. You hamstring them when you file a chargeback, they can no longer communicate with you, now their fraud dept has to communicate with the banks, merchant processor, etc.

Your card company will always tell you not to close the dispute, they make money off you not closing it. However, if you want to continue to do business with TRR I advise you close it and let the process play out.

I waited: SIX MONTHS for a refund from Hermes.com for a belt kit I returned that was the wrong size. I had already ordered the correct size and it took them SIX months to quality control it and ensure I had NOT been dishonest in my return, mind you I turned this around the same day I received because I have an in-house freight dept.
My point: MANY would have filed a chargeback to get their funds back, six months is a ridiculous wait time for a refund on an unworn item that was returned same day in 100% optimum condition. However, I sat on my hands and was patient because I intended to continue business with Hermes.

Customers who bypass our policies and use their banks chargeback system to get refunds before we process them are blaklisted from buying from us. It shows us that you think you are above our policies and should have things faster than we can reasonably accomodate.
Just offering you food for thought....
While I agree with lots of points in your posts, I have to say, even I dislike charge backs but in some situations it's worth to take that action, yeah, you may not take charge back to Hermes because they are there for hundreds years and you and I all know they will resolve it and do it right, not so much to say with some other companies, besides, if some business already not doing honest things such as doesn't disclose major flaws, inauthentic, damages, not safely deliver goods, then, by all means I would not want to buy anything expensive or to risk of losing my money on, I definitely would file charge backs after multiple attempts communicate with them prior to take my action.

Especially in such economy, who can afford to lose money to untrustworthy businesses practice? by all means, I would charge back and if that kills my addition buying from them then that's a great plus!
 
It maybe hurtful to a business received a charge back, but in such case since you had already filed charge back, I would say it's probably better just stick with it, let your bank refund you.

While I agree with lots of points in your posts, I have to say, even I dislike charge backs but in some situations it's worth to take that action, yeah, you may not take charge back to Hermes because they are there for hundreds years and you and I all know they will resolve it and do it right, not so much to say with some other companies, besides, if some business already not doing honest things such as doesn't disclose major flaws, inauthentic, damages, not safely deliver goods, then, by all means I would not want to buy anything expensive or to risk of losing my money on, I definitely would file charge backs after multiple attempts communicate with them prior to take my action.

Especially in such economy, who can afford to lose money to untrustworthy businesses practice? by all means, I would charge back and if that kills my addition buying from them then that's a great plus!

I do agree with your points, however I did end up closing the dispute.

I spoke with a senior client services member at the real real, and they assure me that I will get reimbursed if I closed the dispute and sent them proof I did. I followed their recommendation. I am waiting to hear back, though I am sure this will take some time.

But knowing how large The Real Real is, I am sure they will pay me back eventually, it will just involve a lot of following up on my end.
 
While I agree with lots of points in your posts, I have to say, even I dislike charge backs but in some situations it's worth to take that action, yeah, you may not take charge back to Hermes because they are there for hundreds years and you and I all know they will resolve it and do it right, not so much to say with some other companies, besides, if some business already not doing honest things such as doesn't disclose major flaws, inauthentic, damages, not safely deliver goods, then, by all means I would not want to buy anything expensive or to risk of losing my money on, I definitely would file charge backs after multiple attempts communicate with them prior to take my action.

Especially in such economy, who can afford to lose money to untrustworthy businesses practice? by all means, I would charge back and if that kills my addition buying from them then that's a great plus!
It should not be anyone's method to resolve a dispute. It should be used when a merchant fails to reply or is actually shady. If you read my posts you would have realized the difference. People these days do not always give merchants a chance to make things right, also they ignore written policies and assume those policies should not apply to them. Use the chargeback power as a last resort, not the first action.
 
  • Insightful
Reactions: 880
It should not be anyone's method to resolve a dispute. It should be used when a merchant fails to reply or is actually shady. If you read my posts you would have realized the difference. People these days do not always give merchants a chance to make things right, also they ignore written policies and assume those policies should not apply to them. Use the chargeback power as a last resort, not the first action.
First of all I did not say it has to be a method for everyone to resolve a dispute, second, even if a Customer used charge back in some situations such as delivered an empty box, I don’t see any wrong doing on the customer part Either, especially if she/he had back and forth contacted seller for the issue and could not get it solved. By all means, charge back. Not only get money back, also teach a lesson to the seller to do Their job better.
 
Top