Oh dear, our tie dying friend is at it again with the Chevre oldies. I think this one is (*was*) a 2004 Sky Blue Work 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/325463234231?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/325463234231?
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Are any of these actually selling?Oh dear, our tie dying friend is at it again with the Chevre oldies. I think this one is (*was*) a 2004 Sky Blue Work
https://www.ebay.com/itm/325463234231?
Oh dear, our tie dying friend is at it again with the Chevre oldies. I think this one is (*was*) a 2004 Sky Blue Work
https://www.ebay.com/itm/325463234231?
Not acceptable IMO, if the wear wasn't listed. The photos you've posted are clear whereas the ones from the listing aren't, so the wear isn't as obvious. I'd mention that if you're returning.I’m not sure if this is the right thread for this, but I just wanted someone else’s opinion since I know that I can be a little bit of a perfectionist at times… I very recently purchased a 2005 pewter First on Poshmark, but when it arrived there was noticeable cosmetic damage on the outside of the bag and all of the tassels were split. Oddly, the mirror, the interior, and the hardware on the bag are all in perfect condition but the scuffs are noticeable enough that I am going to try to return it to the seller (my first time doing this, but I always ask plenty of questions when necessary before buying pre-loved bags).
They posted photos that didn’t show any of it, and it’s not in terrible condition but it’s not something that I would’ve bought had I known beforehand. Just wondering what you guys think of this bag? Am I making a bigger deal out of this than necessary? And has anyone had any experience with making a return on Poshmark?
The professional looking photos are two from the original listing.
View attachment 5672275
View attachment 5672276
View attachment 5672277
View attachment 5672283
View attachment 5672284
View attachment 5672285
View attachment 5672286
View attachment 5672287
View attachment 5672288
View attachment 5672289
Thank you, I’m happy to hear it wasn’t just my thoughts! I’ll make sure to mention it. I specifically asked if there was any damage, but she said “just normal use”..which to me means more like light wear as opposed to this. Sadly, I had a bad feeling about it when I saw how it was sent (in a beat-up box covered in duct tapeNot acceptable IMO, if the wear wasn't listed. The photos you've posted are clear whereas the ones from the listing aren't, so the wear isn't as obvious. I'd mention that if you're returning.
I agree. So I’ve just opened a claim with them, which I believe means the payment is paused until it’s resolved. I briefly thought about keeping it anyway, but I was so unhappy with it being inaccurate that I knew I’d prob never use it.Pics 5 & 6 are bad. The bag looks great in the first pic, but they should have disclosed the other issues. Did you give them the ok to disperse your payment?
Thank you, *fingers crossed*The wear and tear is a bit rough. I can understand why you’re disappointed. Although Metallics are more fragile, they could’ve done a better job describing the real condition. Hope returning isn’t too stressful and that you find a better one later.
Thanks! I actually used varnish stain remover and it works. Now my only question is that if the bag has been in circulation before it seems like it doesn’t match with the current style in Balenciaga website.Sorry, maybe someone else knows how to clean this material.
If it were mine, I’d probably try a white eraser. Just a small chance that would lighten it.
Thanks! I actually used varnish stain remover and it works. Now my only question is that if the bag has been in circulation before it seems like it doesn’t match with the current style in Balenciaga website.