Prince Harry and Meghan Markle thread

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I kindly request that all members participating in the MM and Harry thread dial back the vile rhetoric.

I am not opposed to discussing public personas on TPF, including the constant torrent of news surrounding the couple from this thread. But I find it troubling when their looks are being nitpicked apart to a degree that is just not appropriate.

This thread has drawn criticism over the years, and I discussed it at great length with Megs and the mods. I am not looking to close it down, but the vitriol needs to be dialed back.

My personal feelings about hate threads aside, this ultra-negative vibe is something better suited for other forums, Reddit, or elsewhere. I am holding our community to higher standards.

Thanks for reading.
 
In retrospect, maybe we got it wrong all along … YEARS AGO, we criticized KC3. Why was he meekly paying all the bills ??

Now it comes out that Megxit was the result of KC3 saying he could not / would not pay for the Harkle spendathon - KC3 quietly put his foot down, and they flounced out

Their first Megxit manifesto was about financial independence not privacy and security … so, we have circled back to the start, it was ALWAYS about money
But also about H being STUPID not to realize all the value of the BRF non liquid perks (security, housing, PR)
 
In retrospect, maybe we got it wrong all along … YEARS AGO, we criticized KC3. Why was he meekly paying all the bills ??

Now it comes out that Megxit was the result of KC3 saying he could not / would not pay for the Harkle spendathon - KC3 quietly put his foot down, and they flounced out

Their first Megxit manifesto was about financial independence not privacy and security … so, we have circled back to the start, it was ALWAYS about money
But also about H being STUPID not to realize all the value of the BRF non liquid perks (security, housing, PR)
It always made no sense that they fled to "freedom" and to establish themselves as financially independent, and yet expected Bank of Dad to continue paying for everything. I'm sorely tempted to take a walk on the dark side and see how stans are twisting the laws of the universe to continue their rabid support. But I have to wash my hair .... :whistle:
 
It’s Easter Sunday, a Christian celebration, they were raised Christian and have had their children baptized, yet it seems the Suckesses make no attempt to ever attend church?

Meanwhile, across the pond, Looking at all the family pictures from the Easter Service this morning, the vibe is “Harry and Meghan Who?” They all, including Andrew, strategically tucked in next to Anne in the family procession, all seemed quite fine minus the miscreants of Montecito.
 


It’s Easter Sunday, a Christian celebration, they were raised Christian and have had their children baptized, yet it seems the Suckesses make no attempt to ever attend church?

Meanwhile, across the pond, Looking at all the family pictures from the Easter Service this morning, the vibe is “Harry and Meghan Who?” They all, including Andrew, strategically tucked in next to Anne in the family procession, all seemed quite fine minus the miscreants of Montecito.
LOL....he was raised Christian...her mom was a new agey person so not sure about her upbringing in that regard. the Christening was a show/party IMO - not really about religion

Guess they forgot to find a church to go to for Easter
 
It’s Easter Sunday, a Christian celebration, they were raised Christian and have had their children baptized, yet it seems the Suckesses make no attempt to ever attend church?

Meanwhile, across the pond, Looking at all the family pictures from the Easter Service this morning, the vibe is “Harry and Meghan Who?” They all, including Andrew, strategically tucked in next to Anne in the family procession, all seemed quite fine minus the miscreants of Montecito.
These two worship at The Church of the Almighty Dollar. Having the children christened was just done for PR.
 
LOL....he was raised Christian...her mom was a new agey person so not sure about her upbringing in that regard. the Christening was a show/party IMO - not really about religion

Guess they forgot to find a church to go to for Easter
Some Harkle-friendly publications claim that they were busy setting up an elaborate easter egg hunt for the invisikids. I didn't click in, but the Hello feature was dated in February, 1.5 months before Easter. Maybe it was a Netflix/merching shoot so they celebrated Easter early to allow time for the Photoshop.
 
It’s Easter Sunday, a Christian celebration, they were raised Christian and have had their children baptized, yet it seems the Suckesses make no attempt to ever attend church?

Meanwhile, across the pond, Looking at all the family pictures from the Easter Service this morning, the vibe is “Harry and Meghan Who?” They all, including Andrew, strategically tucked in next to Anne in the family procession, all seemed quite fine minus the miscreants of Montecito.
YES, this is about religion, believe in what ever you want and show respect to all, but the mockery of the baptisms-for-show, hmm, grate me the wrong way
 
:shocked:This is why Royal women never cross their legs, except perhaps at the ankles.

View attachment 5759510
I see this so often with celebs on TV, especially on the nighttime talk shows. And you can tell they know how short their dresses are by the way they self-consciously tug them down while standing and then try to adjust while seated. Some are oblivious to it though.
 
@sdkitty mentioned The Harkles and religion. Here is what Diana was into. I’m sure it influenced Harold, as seen in his book.
Also!
This was from 1997 (!) and look at this about Charles:

“Diana’s former husband, Prince Charles, was also a religious adventurer, showing a keen interest in eastern religions and suggesting that as king he would want to be a ``defender of faith″ rather than ``defender of the faith.″

 
Last edited:
I recall reading somewhere recently that you can buy a square foot or yard of land in Scotland for less than $100 and you can be a lord or lady. Wish I could find the ad.
Oh that's not really legitimate. But they can always buy a title from Sealand... Those titles are kind of genuine - if you recognise Sealand as a sovereign nation:

https://sealandgov.org/

In any case, they're just as legitimate as the Danish "Count of Monpezat" IMO :biggrin::lol:
 
In retrospect, maybe we got it wrong all along … YEARS AGO, we criticized KC3. Why was he meekly paying all the bills ??

Now it comes out that Megxit was the result of KC3 saying he could not / would not pay for the Harkle spendathon - KC3 quietly put his foot down, and they flounced out

Their first Megxit manifesto was about financial independence not privacy and security … so, we have circled back to the start, it was ALWAYS about money
But also about H being STUPID not to realize all the value of the BRF non liquid perks (security, housing, PR)

I still don't get how Harry couldn't maintain a wife on his share. Like, there are people operating on 2000 bucks with no free housing and they can keep the wife home to take care of the children.

I would also like to know - maybe it has been mentioned - if Kate received her own salary or if William maintained her from his share just as he maintained his children.

If I should guess I'd say that's exactly it but Ghoul thought she deserved more. Also, I honestly doubt they'd "use her as they liked" to use Ghoul's unbareable cheese but told her she'd do it for free. But what do I know!
 
Top