OJ Simpson 1947-2024

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

“you're"correcting" me here for using the correctabbreviation for my degree. I have an MEd which is a Masters of Education not an MD.”

Those are your words. You do not seem to be functionally illiterate. At no time were you ‘accused’ of claiming to be an MD. At no time was your usage of the degree ‘corrected’.

You used the abbreviation. Great. You were pointing out that you didn’t go to law school, you ended up getting an MEd.

I didn’t ‘accuse’ you of claiming to be a doctor. I simply said I’d assume you were referring to ‘master of education’ and not doctor.
And since you are SO committed to claiming that you meant to put a decimal in AND DIDN’T, by your own logic, it would be reasonable for me to make SURE that you weren’t, ya know, making another typing error or error committed against you by your phone. Sorry, but since you’ve by your own admission made typing mistakes, it’s not accusing you of anything just to make sure, now is it.

So again, your getting all aggrieved about people ‘accusing’ you of this that and the other is simply YOU reading stuff into what’s not there. How can anyone help you with that except you??
No one accused you of anything. It’s called ‘making sure we’re all on the same page’.

And apparently we just have to quit explaining to you that yes, exonerate means to clear from blame, but that OJ was not exonerated. He was found ‘not guilty’.
If they meant the same thing in criminal court, they wouldn’t say ‘not guilty’. They’d say ‘we the jury, find the defendant exonerated’. Right?
The fact that a criminal court uses both words but for different reasons is your big ol’ tip-off that no, they don’t mean the same thing.

Rent cases aren’t criminal. I seem to recall also specifically mentioning...gasp...real estate law....earlier...and pointing out that the word ‘exonerate’ carries a different legal definition outside of a criminal context.
I mean, if you want to bring other kinds of law into it, well, OJ WAS found liable for two deaths in civil court. So. Maybe you don’t want to go there. Better luck elsewhere!
 
Can't believe that this is really still a debate after all of this time.....no one else has ever been accused nor brought up on charges.
It’s not a debate, other than in the sense that there are also still people trying to debate the world being round or that dinosaurs weren’t real, or that no one has really been to the moon and so on.
 
“you're"correcting" me here for using the correctabbreviation for my degree. I have an MEd which is a Masters of Education not an MD.”

Those are your words. You do not seem to be functionally illiterate. At no time were you ‘accused’ of claiming to be an MD. At no time was your usage of the degree ‘corrected’.

You used the abbreviation. Great. You were pointing out that you didn’t go to law school, you ended up getting an MEd.

I didn’t ‘accuse’ you of claiming to be a doctor. I simply said I’d assume you were referring to ‘master of education’ and not doctor.
And since you are SO committed to claiming that you meant to put a decimal in AND DIDN’T, by your own logic, it would be reasonable for me to make SURE that you weren’t, ya know, making another typing error or error committed against you by your phone. Sorry, but since you’ve by your own admission made typing mistakes, it’s not accusing you of anything just to make sure, now is it.

So again, your getting all aggrieved about people ‘accusing’ you of this that and the other is simply YOU reading stuff into what’s not there. How can anyone help you with that except you??
No one accused you of anything. It’s called ‘making sure we’re all on the same page’.

And apparently we just have to quit explaining to you that yes, exonerate means to clear from blame, but that OJ was not exonerated. He was found ‘not guilty’.
If they meant the same thing in criminal court, they wouldn’t say ‘not guilty’. They’d say ‘we the jury, find the defendant exonerated’. Right?
The fact that a criminal court uses both words but for different reasons is your big ol’ tip-off that no, they don’t mean the same thing.

Rent cases aren’t criminal. I seem to recall also specifically mentioning...gasp...real estate law....earlier...and pointing out that the word ‘exonerate’ carries a different legal definition outside of a criminal context.
I mean, if you want to bring other kinds of law into it, well, OJ WAS found liable for two deaths in civil court. So. Maybe you don’t want to go there. Better luck elsewhere!

you are very intelligent and I enjoy your posts. You have great insight and are very eloquent.
 
Can't believe that this is really still a debate after all of this time.....no one else has ever been accused nor brought up on charges.
And I mean...again. The autopsy report says what it says.
There are also...SADLY...photos of Goldman relatively easy to access in which one can see with one’s own eyes that nothing like what is being claimed was done. Not either ‘variation’.
Like Richard Pryor’s immortal line: “Who are you going to believe? Me, or your lying eyes??”

Ah, Richard Pryor, another great gone too soon.
 
you are very intelligent and I enjoy your posts. You have great insight and are very eloquent.
Oh, I meant to say and don’t know how to pm; if that’s your pug, with a little LV chew toy, it should have a product line or an Instagram or something. I love pugs; that’s my dream dog. I’ll say, there are homely pugs out there, but that one is ADORABLE.
 
Oh, I meant to say and don’t know how to pm; if that’s your pug, with a little LV chew toy, it should have a product line or an Instagram or something. I love pugs; that’s my dream dog. I’ll say, there are homely pugs out there, but that one is ADORABLE.

Thanks so much. Yes that is my sweet baby girl. :heart: And that is her Chewy vuitton. hehe
Pugs are amazing animals. If you are lucky to find one, you will be blessed beyond belief with the love and joy they bring.
 
I figure it’s only a matter of time before he is back in jail. I listened to a podcast that did a pretty thorough history of what happened before the murders. Absolutely NO ONE held this man accountable for anything. He was a bully so half the people were afraid of him and the other half idolized him. I am not at all surprised he passed the polygraphs - you have to actually think lying is wrong or that you did something wrong in order to fail. He pretty much disgusts me as a human being.
 
I saw & read this too. I guess abstaining from drinking alcohol was not a condition of his parole. Didn't take him long to F up again!!! I don't know but assume he was already ban from the Casino hotel where the robbery/kidnapping took place.

from what I have read, He is not supposed to have a blood alcohol level over .08% Pretty sure if you're as tanked up as they say he was, he was def over that!
 
Top