Michael Fassbender

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

One does not need to know every/any detail of this man's interior life to appreciate his work ............


It speaks for itself.

He has a human right to have privacy; he should be free of other peoples' obsessions and prejudices. After all he pays his taxes and obeys the law. He has the right to work hard and play hard with whomever he chooses. It is none of the public business...
 

Attachments

  • 2012.jpg
    2012.jpg
    110.7 KB · Views: 600
One does not need to know every/any detail of this man's interior life to appreciate his work ............


It speaks for itself.

He has a human right to have privacy; he should be free of other peoples' obsessions and prejudices. After all he pays his taxes and obeys the law. He has the right to work hard and play hard with whomever he chooses. It is none of the public business...



Thanks so much for saying that. I applaude u. Couldn't say it better myself. For some people its all about taking him apart bit by bit just to examine every detail, its all a bit too much for me. He does amazing work, everything else should be less important.
 
http://www.elleuk.com/star-style/ne...as-hoult-x-men-set-gold-buggy-wheelie#image=1

What happens when you put four talented, attractive, typically boy-like actors on an X-Men film set, with golf buggies to ferry them around?

Trouble, of course.

First off, Michael Fassbender and James McAvoy were banned from using the buggies after crashing one into a car (and for the record, it wasn't bad-bpy Michael behind the wheel, but butter-wouldn't-melt McAvoy).

'I was hanging off the back, keeping the weight on the outside tyres, and we went up on two wheels,' says Fass happily.

'The next thing we went bang straight into the back of a parked Lexus. James smashed off the perspex glass at the front, I went flying over the back seats and hit my head off the steering wheel and landed in the drivers seat – so everyone thinks it was me that crashed it – and I was like, if I'm here, where's James? And then I hear [slips into a perfect Scottish accent]: "Are you alright, pal?" and he's on the ground and there’s a big lump on his head. My shins were cut up. I might still have some scars from that actually [rolls up trouser leg, proudly displays scar]. There, right there.'

McAvoy, however, is unrepentant.

'I know the golf buggy story yeah, but I tell it kind of differently. He landed in the driver’s sat… and then ran away. Don’t get me wrong, it was still all my fault, but he ran away with a comedy caper run. And I’m not joking, there was a comedy caper, his shins were all cut up and bleeding. I left my mark on Michael Fassbender. It was good fun.'

So, banned. But the ban didn't stick. Because on the set of X-Men: Days of Future Past, our intrepid would-be racing drivers were back behind the buggy-wheel, this time armed with a couple more co-stars, to see if it's possible to execute a perfect wheelie.

Fassbender: 'We did manage to steal one, and managed to do a wheelie, which I was pretty impressed by. We had two people in the back seat, and two in the front, and I floored it into reverse then I just clicked it into forward while we were moving backward and slammed the accelerator and for a couple of wonderful seconds we were on two wheels!’

So who were their partners in crime? Over to Mr McAvoy... 'The fact we had Nicholas Hoult and Hugh Jackman in the back tipped the balance and helped us pull off the wheelie.'

Men! [sighs and rolls eyes]
 
Link: http://www.bensbasement.co.uk/2014/05/review-frank.html


Director: Lenny Abrahamson
Starring: Michael Fassbender, Domhnall Gleeson, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Scoot McNairy
Certificate: 15
Run-time: 95 minutes

Must-See

IN SHORT: Frank is a supremely entertaining movie, filled with colourful, unstable characters, the occasional dark twist and a pitch black comedic tongue.
Frank opens with budding singer-songwriter Jon (Domnhall Gleeson) pacing around his coastal town, desperately trying to write a song. After hours of trying, inspiration finally hits him and he races home to record his melody. It's only when he's sat down at his keyboard that he realises the tune he's been humming all day is a Madness track. Dejected and all but finished with his dreams of pop super-stardom, Jon returns back to his soul-sucking office 9-5. That's until a coincidental encounter with Soronprfbs; an avant-garde band made up of former psychiatric patients, quirks and an enigmatic lead-singer who wears an oversized papier-mâché head, offer him one last chance to pursue his dream.
Frank is a complex movie. Flitting between comedy, drama and faux-biopic, it juggles a multitude of themes. With sardonic cynicism, Frank pokes fun at sites like Twitter and Youtube, critiquing the importance contemporary musicians place upon them. Jon constantly hash-tags throughout the movie, building up a steady mass of 'devoted' followers despite the fact that the band have never released an album. And when Frank (Michael Fassbender) gets excited upon hearing that a Soronprfbs Youtube video has 29,000 hits, he's upset to learn that "29,000 hits is nothing on Youtube".
Just like the audience, Jon is an outsider, ignorant to the band's bizarre way of life and innovative creative processes. Scenes with the band practicing provide Frank's funniest moments as Jon tries to construct a song with this collective of musically-accomplished weirdos. However, even funnier is that these weirdos, with their random screeches, chaotic strumming and out-of-key harmonies, create beautiful music. And Frank, although hampered by the giant head, has a fragile but gruff voice that allows these strange tunes to resonate with the listener.
A comedy first and foremost, there's also a genuine tenderness to Frank that grounds all of these zany shenanigans. Lenny Abrahamson's movie isn't just a funny off-beat musical caper, it's thoughtful with a few notes of melancholy. Michael Fassbender drives the dramatic core of the film, superbly portraying the anxiety of a mentally ill man. The performance isn't showy either, in fact Frank spends much of the movie in the background, overshadowed by louder members of the band. Gleeson's role is rather different, he excels as the comedic narrator but his role is also refreshingly subversive, almost the villain of the piece.
Overall, Frank is a supremely entertaining movie, filled with colourful, unstable characters, the occasional dark twist and a pitch black comedic tongue. The wonderfully off-the-wall performances are grounded by the fantastic script that keeps the movie realistic and also relevant. The sometimes brutal composition of comedy and morbid reality is not for everyone though and the semi-sentimental ending feels out of place. However those with a penchant for the slightly anarchic and weirdly wonderful will feel comfortable marching along to Frank's bonkers beat.
 
The Guardian, Tuesday 13 May 2014 Steve Rose

2014, X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST
Wolverine, played by Hugh Jackman, must try to prevent a future apocalypse in X-Men: Days of Future Past. Photograph: Allstar/20th Century Fox
The latest installment in this sector of Marvel's comic-book empire is a film of two halves. It takes place in two different eras, which means two different teams of superheroes battling to save humanity in their own ways, and two different casts: the Patrick Stewart/Ian McKellen gang from the first bunch of X-Men movies, and the younger generation, led by James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender, from 2011's X-Men: First Class.
Unfortunately, it's a matter of two halves for the audience, too. If you've consulted your ring-binder of data from the previous six X-Men movies, you'll probably enjoy this. If you come to it fresh, it can be like trying to follow two games of chess at once.
The story involves time travel. The "classic" McKellen/Stewart X-Men are in some dystopian future where virtually everyone has been killed by indestructible robots called Sentinels. As a last resort, they send Wolverine, Hugh Jackman's alpha X-Man (right), back to the 1970s, Terminator-style. He must prevent a future apocalypse by foiling the Sentinels' inventor (Peter Dinklage, sadly kept on a tight rein compared with Game Of Thrones).
For the plan to work, Jackman must unite McAvoy and Fassbender – respectively the psychic Martin Luther King and metal-bending Malcolm X of the mutant struggle. Having fallen out in the previous X-Men movie, McAvoy is now a disillusioned addict and Fassbender is in a secure prison 100 floors beneath the Pentagon. Keeping up so far?
Most of the action takes place in this parallel 1970s, which means allusions to Vietnam, a cameo for Nixon and a wardrobe borrowed from American Hustle. Jennifer Lawrence's involvement confuses matters further. She's key to the success of the mission, but despite being able to alter her appearance however she wishes, she's obliged to spend most of the film prancing around virtually naked save for blue body paint.
Non-devotees might well give up, but director Bryan Singer always has a neat special effect, a well-timed gag or an action set piece around the corner, whipping up the action towards a symphonic climax.
For me, one unforgivable feature was the appearance, and rapid disappearance, of Quicksilver – an amiably nonchalant teen with the power to move so fast everyone else practically becomes a statue. The highlight of the movie is a scene where Quicksilver whizzes round altering the trajectories of enemy bullets hanging in the air, effectively getting everyone out of trouble without even removing his headphones. It's a visual and comic delight. It's also, in this Top Trumps world, a pretty handy superpower to have when you've got a world to save, you'd have thought. But inexplicably, the other X-Men just send him home early. Why? Perhaps because Quicksilver is also scheduled to appear in the next Avengers movie, another Marvel franchise being made by a different studio to X-Men.
These superheroes might be able to transcend the laws of nature but the logic of the franchise proves to be immutable, even if it means spoiling the audience's fun. For all its ambitious plotting, this X-Men is really an effective merger of the franchise's two separate incarnations, resolving one and continuing the other on its way towards the next summer blockbuster in 2016 – assuming there's still an appetite for it.
 
Frank review – a weird, wonderful movie that dances to a different beat
In a funny yet poignant film, Michael Fassbender's turn as cult character Frank Sidebottom proves liberating rather than limiting
4 out of 5 Stars Mark Kermode
The Observer, Sunday 11 May 2014
If you've ever wondered what would happen if you transplanted the method of Captain Beefheart and the madness of Daniel Johnston into the gigantic papier-mache head of Frank Sidebottom (and frankly, who hasn't?) then this surreally comic – and yet poignant – oddity has the answers. Investing the frame of Chris Sievey's madcap creation with the tortured soul of avant garde rock, Frank manages to get beneath the mask and the skin of its eponymous antihero in a manner that bridges the gap between absurdist laughter and all-too-tender tears. The result is something weird, wonderful, and utterly unique – a cracked classic which takes its place alongside the Barbie-doll animation Superstar and the conjoined twins mockumentary Brothers of the Head in the pantheon of genuinely unexpected pop movies.
The roots of Frank lie in a newspaper article by Jon Ronson detailing his time as keyboard player in Frank Sidebottom's Oh Blimey Big Band. As with The Men Who Stare at Goats, Ronson's real-life reportage provided the springboard for a screenplay (co-written with Peter Straughan) which spins fantastical tall tales from stranger-than-fiction fact. To be clear: this is not the Frank Sidebottom story, in the same way that Todd Haynes's I'm Not There was not a Bob Dylan biopic. Rather, it inhabits an alternative universe in which mimicry and tribute (the film is dedicated to Sievey) form their own kind of strangely sincere (un)truth; in which characters try on one another's clothes, haircuts, and heads while striving to be somebody else; and in which it's not entirely unusual for someone to be sexually attracted to mannequins.
The film's closest link to "reality" is the faux naif dorkishness of Domhnall Gleeson's wannabe pop star Jon Burroughs, a Ronsonesque narrator who winds up playing keyboards for the unpronounceable Soronprfbs after the previous incumbent attempts to drown himself in the sea. Summoned to Ireland, Jon finds himself a willing prisoner in the rehearsal and recording of the band's new album, a year-long process which nods to legendary tales of Trout Mask Replica. Entranced by the fake head that group leader Frank wears 24/7 ("Would it help if I said my facial expressions out loud?"), Jon becomes seduced both by the guru-like enigma of his mentor, and by the waving hands of theremin player Clara (Maggie Gyllenhaal), who seems able to conjure beautiful sounds and savage weapons out of thin air with equal ease.
Getting the performers to play the music for real pays dividends, with composer Stephen Rennicks leading the cast through songs that range from the oblique (such as Lone Standing Tuft, an ode to a stray carpet strand) to the hilarious (Frank's Most Likeable Song – "people will love it") to the heartbreaking (I Love You All, already a haunting indie classic). From the chaos of an opening gig in an English coastal town, to the anarchic creativity of rehearsals in Ireland and the last-minute "new direction" of a terrifying appearance at SXSW in Texas, the assorted Soronprfbs look and sound like a "real" band trapped in a world of surreal strife. While individual characters may push the envelope of eccentricity, the horrors of a band on tour are as recognisable as the home truths of Spinal Tap (you can almost hear David St Hubbins exclaiming: "Too much ****in' perspective").
Bearing the heaviest burden is Michael Fassbender, released (rather than weighed down) by the cumbersome mask which proves his character's liberation. Infusing the pantomimey finger-fiddling of Frank Sidebottom with the pathos of Daniel Johnston's twitchy tactility, Fassbender conjures a fully rounded character (from America rather than Timperley) whose expeditions along the edge of sanity question oft-repeated clichés about the genius of madness (and vice versa). With his facial expressions obliterated by Frank's immovable look of ooh-er astonishment (and his voice muffled by eggshell casing), Fassbender is forced to speak with his body, his stance and mannerisms precisely tuned to the complex tragicomic twists of the story.
It takes a director of some talent to stop such an outlandish venture tipping over into mere quirky indulgence, and Lenny Abrahamson rises to the challenge magnificently. From the Beckett-inflected riffs of Adam & Paul to the domesticated sociopathy of What Richard Did, Abrahamson has proved himself an astute observer of "borderline" behaviour. It's hard to find a duff performance in any of his films, and false notes are few and far between. Here, he orchestrates the key change from goofiness to sadness with an elegance that means we never notice the sly introduction of a narrative minor-third. As Frank peels away the layers of its subject's onion-like facade to reveal a piper at the gates of dawn beneath, so our own grinning expressions start to falter. And whereas a lesser director would have been content to leave us amused and amazed, Abrahamson ensures that we are also moved.
While Frank may not be for everyone (just as Sidebottom, Beefheart and Johnston were never chart-toppers), for those who like their movies to dance to a different beat, it is something rather exceptional.
You know it is. It really is.
 
X-Men: A Blast From the Past (and Future)

Bryan Singer's Days of Future Past is the franchise's most ambitious installment to date.
Christopher OrrMay 23 2014, 7:31 AM ET


cdn.theatlantic.com/static/newsroom/img/mt/2014/05/Xmen_beast_wolverine_xavier/lead.jpg?n611ro 20th Century Fox

The cast, by my back-of-the-envelope tally, has collectively earned 10 Oscar nominations over the years, along with more Golden Globes, Emmys, and BAFTAs than I care to count.
If I’d written that sentence two decades ago, one might have assumed I was describing a Robert Altman film. But it is a testament to the remarkable tenacity of the superhero genre—a genre that has more than once seemed utterly spent—that I’m referring not to an Altman but to an X-Men.

Now it’s true that X-Men: Days of Future Past has achieved this milestone in part through arithmetic slight of hand, by essentially combining the cast of the first three X-Men films (Hugh Jackman, Halle Barry, Ian McKellen, Anna Paquin—here present only in minute cameo—Patrick Stewart, Ellen Page, etc.) with that of its subsequent pre-boot, X-Men: First Class (Jennifer Lawrence, Michael Fassbender, James McAvoy, Nicholas Hoult…) Still, it is an impressive accumulation of talent, one reinforced by the return of director Bryan Singer, who masterfully helmed the first two installments of the franchise.
As he demonstrated in those earlier films, Singer has a particular aptitude for taking narratives that teeter on the precipice of preposterousness and imbuing them with unexpected moral resonance and gravity. It’s a skill set in notable demand over the course of this exceptionally ambitious new chapter, which interweaves not only casts but storylines, time periods, and dramatic moods.
Singer opens in the dystopian near-future, with a shot of a post-apocalyptic Manhattan presided over by an Empire State Building with a hole punched through its upper floors. Intelligent robots called the Sentinels have conducted a decade-long war to eradicate mutants, a war that they have unilaterally expanded to include human beings suspected of helping mutants as well as those who might produce mutant offspring down the road. In practice, this seems to mean “pretty much all humankind.” (Yes, the echoes of Skynet rumble loudly.)

A few familiar franchisees (Professor X, Magneto, Wolverine, Storm) and assorted minor mutants (Bishop, Blink, Sunspot) take sanctuary in a remote Himalayan monastery, where they adopt a plan to save the future by altering the past. Kitty Pryde (Page) will project the consciousness of Wolverine (Jackman) back to his semi-ageless 1973 self. There he will enlist the aid of the younger versions of Professor X (McAvoy) and Magneto (Fassbender) in an effort to prevent Mystique (Lawrence) from killing the Sentinels’ inventor, Bolivar Trask (Peter Dinklage)—a murder that precipitated the all-out war against mutants that has wrought such global havoc.
Still with me? From this conceit, the movie proceeds in relatively straightforward fashion, with a slumbering future Wolverine (shades of The Matrix) trying to accomplish his mission in the past (a whiff of Austin Powers), before time runs out and the Sentinels hunt down the last remaining mutants in the monastery.
There are missteps here and there. The Sentinels are a disappointingly familiar hybrid of the T-1000 Terminator and (especially) the Destroyer from Thor. Even by blockbuster standards, the movie plays awfully fast and loose with the consequences of time travel. And the climactic sequence, in which the Nixon White House is encircled by—nope, it’s a detail too good to reveal—seems like an event far more likely to have started a war against mutants than to have averted one.
This film belongs principally to the triangular affections and antipathies of the younger Xavier, Magneto, and Mystique.But given the scope and audacity of the film, Singer does a masterful job of keeping his many balls in the air. The ‘70s-era storyline has fun not only with the fashion and the cultural touchstones (lava lamps, Roberta Flack), but neatly conjures the look of period film. A central sequence takes place in the midst of the Paris Peace Accords, and there are cunning references to the Kennedy assassination (what could have accounted for the magic bullet?), as well as the introductions of a few characters who appeared earlier (which is to say, later) in the franchise.
Jackman once again seems more alive when playing Wolverine than he does in any other role, though the habitrail-diameter veins in his herculean arms are becoming a matter of concern. (In one of the movie’s many nice touches, we’re reminded that even though he looks the same on the outside, the pre-admantium-ized Logan is a more fragile hero altogether.) Stewart lends his customary air of gentle authority to the proceedings as (the elder) Professor X, and McKellen—well, honestly McKellen looks a bit bored, which is understandable enough after four tours as Magneto and five (and counting) as Gandalf.
The torch, in any case, is being handed off. This film, like X-Men: First Class, belongs principally to the triangular affections and antipathies of the younger Xavier, Magneto, and Mystique. Much has happened since the prior film, and McAvoy’s Professor X, in particular, has borne the brunt of it, losing his powers and his faith. His doubts, as ever, find their antithesis in the heedless certainty of Fassbender’s Magneto. Which leaves Lawrence’s Mystique as—if you’ll forgive the phrase—the x factor, the weight that can tip the scales one way or the other. Mystique is the principal moral axis around which the film pivots, and Lawrence handles this responsibility with a precise balance of strength and vulnerability.
X-Men: Days of Future Past is, in other words, not a particularly lighthearted entertainment. That said, I would be remiss not to note that tucked away amid all the existential melodrama is perhaps the most hilarious set piece ever to grace a superhero film. The subject is a jailbreak, and the instigator is Quicksilver (Evan Peters), the first significant character to be jointly claimed by the X-Men franchise (the rights to which are owned by 20th Century Fox) and the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The latter managed to get their version (played by Aaron Taylor-Johnson) onscreen first, in a brief credit-sequence coda to Captain America: The Winter Soldier. But it will be awfully tough for Marvel (and Joss Whedon, who will be directing Taylor-Johnson in the Avengers sequel next year) to contrive a more memorable Quicksilver than Peters's. The overall role may be small, but the rewards of this one sequence—which lasts, perhaps, two minutes—are borderline incalculable. Just sit back and prepare to enjoy yourself when you hear the opening chords of Jim Croce’s “Time in a Bottle."
Who knew that saving the world from Armageddon could be such a gas.






X-Men opens today in Canada.
 
Female Filmmaker Friday: Fish Tank, 2009 (dir. Andrea Arnold)
Posted by cinemafanatic
Link: http://cinema-fanatic.com/2014/05/23/female-filmmaker-friday-fish-tank-2009-dir-andrea-arnold/

I saw this one for the first time a few years back when Michael Fassbender was in all the movies and I was doing some catch up (still haven’t seen all his films, though). This one really struck a chord with me because it’s a nice riff on the Angry Young Man/Kitchen Sink/British New Wave films of the late-50s/early-60s, but with a female protagonist and a female filmmaker, which gives a whole other perspective to the angst of the youth of this socioeconomic class. Beware, there be spoilers after the cut.
One thing I really love about the film is its aspect ratio, which adds to the film’s claustrophobic nature. The film’s protagonist Mia (Katie Jarvis) lives in the projects in East London with her sister and single mother – both of whom she doesn’t care too much for. She spends most of her time alone, practicing hip-hop dancing.
One day her mother brings home a new boyfriend – Connor (Michael Fassbender). The viewer can already tell things are not right with this man, as he walks around Mia’s mother’s flat shirtless – regardless of the fact that there are two young girls around (or maybe because of it). He’s charming and Irish, but Mia maintains an outward indifference. Arnold’s camera, on the otherhand, is going full-on female gaze, taking in all the beauty that is Fassbender’s languid body.
You even get a little glimpse of Mia’s female gaze as well, taking in her mother’s boyfriend in all his male glory. She’s old enough to find a man attractive, but young enough to still want a father figure. These conflicting feelings don’t help her already confused adolescence.
Movies like this are why I wish more female directors would have a strong perspective and would bring this gaze to the forefront. Women oggle men as much as men oggle women, we just tend to be more sly about it. Arnold’s camera is definitely oggling Fassbender in the film. Her casting is spot on, too, as he is extremely charming and good-looking, but his character is just ever so sleazy. You can imagine a lonely woman (and her teenager daughter), falling under spell despite the warning signs that all is not right.
Connor takes Mia and her family on a fishing trip in order win them over. This trip includes one of the goofiest dances you will ever see. Here he’s in full on Dad mode and Mia takes the bait; acting like a kid again, interacting with him like you would expect a father and daughter would. For a brief moment, you see a happiness to Mia that is not common.
When Mia decides she wants to audition for a hip hop dance competition, Connor lends her a videocamera so she can make an audition tape. Again in this scene Arnold utilizes the female gaze, both with her camera and with Mia’s use of Connor’s camera. It’s an interesting moment where Mia feels powerful and Connor, caught by her gaze, is for once powerless.
I wanted to include this shot because Mia almost breaks the forth wall here, but not quite. This shows us that while we are inside Mia’s story, she doesn’t share everything with us and we can’t ever see complete eye-to-eye.
A few days after accidentally Mia catches her mother and Connor having sex, the two adults get ****faced, her mother passes out and Connor takes advantage of Mia. This is a very polite way of saying Connor rapes her. It’s a delicate scene and Mia’s not sure what she wants, but she’s also not in any shape mentally to give consent either. This is how Connor reestablishes his power over her.
After the incident, Connor leaves never to return. Mia tracks him down, only to discover that he has a family of his own – a wife and young daughter. Mia breaks into his home and in a fit of rage urinates on one of his rugs (that’s an interesting retaliation and probably deserves more analysis than I’m capable of at the moment).
This leads to one of the hardest parts of the film. Mia kidnaps his daughter, unsure what she wants to do with her. Eventually, due to the girl’s struggle and protests, Mia pushes her into a river. It’s in this moment we see that Mia really is still a child. Her life has caused her to grow up too fast, but really it’s Conner’s young daughter she envies the most. She wants to be a young, carefree girl again – if she ever was. After Mia returns the girl home, she has one last confrontation with Connor. There are no words – he slaps her and leaves her, hurt, on the ground. Again we see unbalanced power. Connor abused Mia – twice now – and there’s nothing she can do about it about. She put a child in danger, but she herself is still a child. There’s really no one in this movie who behaves responsibly.
There’s a whole other aspect of the film – with travellers, a boy named named Billy and an ill horse – that I didn’t even try to write about just now. There’s a lot of layers and symbolism in this film and it’s one that deserves multiple viewings to take it all in. As the film ties all its pieces together, Mia finally goes to her audition – only to discover it is clearly for erotic dancers. She arrives in a sweats. Again, we see that she is really still a child. Shes’s not quite ready for the world of adults that she finds herself thrust into, but unable to go back to anything else.




This movie had a person effect for a while; the lacking of parenting on the mother's part; poverty and the obvious need for love and the meaning of life. A very bleak environment.........The complex and flawed Conner.....
Look at the lack of clutter and neatness in his home in comparable of Mia's.
 
X-Men: Skin deep, but somehow satisfying Add to ... Adam Nayman
Special to The Globe and Mail
Published Friday, May. 23 2014, 12:00 AM EDT
Last updated Friday, May. 23 2014, 9:45 AM EDT



  • Directed by Bryan Singer
  • Written by Simon Kinberg
  • Starring Hugh Jackman and Jennifer Lawrence
  • Classification PG
  • Year 2014
  • Country USA
  • Language English

Blame Richard Nixon. That’s the satirical thrust of X-Men: Days of Future Past, an enjoyably convoluted time-travel adventure that takes place mostly in a mildly anachronistic 1973, after the end of the Vietnam War and before Watergate, with the President trying to figure out what to do about America’s potentially insurgent mutant population. Convinced by ambitious scientist Bolivar Trask (Peter Dinklage) that the solution to the problem is to green-light a line of mutant-targeting drones called Sentinels, Tricky Dick acts with predictably self-serving expediency – and inadvertently triggers a series of events that leads to a dystopian future in which humans and mutants alike teeter on the verge of extinction.

It’s in this greyed-out, apocalyptic scenario that Bryan Singer’s film lays out its basic plot line: with their backs against the wall in the present tense, the X-Men (or what’s left of them following a series of Sentinel raids) opt to send Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) – or at least his consciousness – back in time 50 years so that his younger self can try to alter this chronology – a scheme that nods to H.G. Wells and Harlan Ellison (as well as the X-Men comics series). The plot details here are so ludicrous and complicated that you’d need some really good actors to put them across, and luckily Days of Future Past has two fine ensembles at its disposal: not only Jackman and the original X-Men cohort (including Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen) but also the sleeker, more contemporary models last seen in the mediocre prequel X-Men: First Class.
The big news since that film’s release in the summer of 2011 is that Jennifer Lawrence has gone on to become the biggest movie star in the free world, and so Days of Future Past has upped her role. Her shape-shifting Mystique has gone from an alienated outsider to a would-be assassin whose actions will dictate the whole of human history.
Wolverine’s mission is to convince the younger versions of Professor X (James McAvoy) and Magneto (Michael Fassbender) to help him stop Mystique from murdering Trask (and inflaming anti-mutant hysteria), and Jackman is in fine form bouncing off his pedigreed co-stars: His scenes with McAvoy replicate his tender rapport with Stewart in the early instalments. And Fassbender is reliably fabulous, fully inhabiting Magneto’s arrogance and ambivalence (it’s a compliment to say that as played the character might convincingly age into Ian McKellen).
Unfortunately, Lawrence doesn’t register as strongly, which partially has to do with her role’s malleable particulars (Mystique spends a lot of time being other people) and also her status in the storyline – as both the hunter and the hunted, she spends most of her time in motion and doesn’t get too many character moments. That’s also true of the film as a whole, which is so elaborately plotted – crosscutting between past and future while keeping a good half-dozen subplots spinning in the air – as to seem more like a contraption than a movie.
Having already directed the first two (and superior) X-Men films, Singer shows a level of comfort with both the material and the cast, and he contributes at least one brilliant comic set piece in which new mutant Quicksilver (Evan Peters) lays waste to a kitchen full of security guards in languorous, Matrix-style bullet time (it looks gorgeous and has the slapstick choreography of a Three Stooges routine). Simon Kinberg’s script is awash in banal, expository dialogue – the characters having to keep explaining the plot to each other – but people don’t go to X-Men movies for naturalistic exchanges: a few pithy one-liners will suffice, and Jackman puts the ones he does get across with the gruff brio of an old pro. (Among the film’s principals Wolverine alone suffers the torment of having his consciousness exist in two time frames at once, but the actor seems to be having fun).
Like Captain America: The Winter Soldier and Godzilla, Days of Future Past tries to use real-world history and iconography to prop up its storyline, and while its allusions aren’t particularly deep, the attempts at contextualizing its fantastical action at least evince a little bit of ambition. It doesn’t take a lot of wit or imagination to use Richard Nixon as a bad guy, but it’s still satisfying to watch a climatic showdown between two supervillains – one brought back from out of the past and the other from off the comic-book page – and wait to see who blinks first. Seems like we’ll always have Nixon to kick around, after all.


Was rated 3 out of 4 stars.
 
Top