Michael Fassbender

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

http://www.reelworldtheology.com/review-the-light-between-oceans/ review / no spoilers

In terms of storytelling, director Derek Cainfrance is a novelist. The journey through The Light Between Oceans is careful, sometimes excruciating. It lingers over moments, drawing them open with beautiful images rather than words so that the shifts between them are deeply felt. At times, these pauses seem unnecessarily long and indulgent, but they are essential to the ultimate pay-off. In retrospect, each window into the lives of these characters is crafted to explore motive and offer understanding for the ones that follow in chronology. This can be appreciated most by a viewer who is prepared to enjoy a story that blooms rather than springs open. This slow-burn narrative can be a shock to the system of those used to a flashy, fluffy, fast-paced culture of entertainment, but how appropriate for the film to reflect the very human pace of the people and relationships on which it focuses.

Arkapaw’s cinematography is gorgeous–the color palette and use of light reflecting the film’s very spiritual exploration of light against darkness. And the performances in the film are well rendered, populating the film with nuanced, believable characters: Vikander’s Isabel and Weisz’s Hannah chief among them.

The Light Between Oceans is a deliberate, visual, visceral story about grace—and I don’t just mean the little girl Grace who is a central figure. No, this story is about the grace that draws together what has been torn asunder, repairs impossible brokenness, defies understanding, and lavishes itself on even the most lost soul.

A romantic period drama, this film is brimming with such souls: the prejudiced father who rejects a beloved daughter; the war veteran plagued with guilt; the bright girl transformed into a desperate woman; and the wronged widow who must choose between resentment and forgiveness. Without warning or even request, grace enters into each of these lives in the form of an innocent little girl.

This is particularly true of Tom and Isabel Sherbourne. Tragedy leaves them desperate for grace, and it comes to them lavishly, drawing them together at the time when they are most fractured. However, rather than letting its power shape, grow, and change them, they try to manipulate and take control of its presence in their lives. In the process, they find themselves emptier and needier rather than satiated. Though grace does not abandon them, it is only in the Sherbourne’s surrender of self that grace is able to do its true, lasting work in their lives. And this comes not a moment too soon.

tlbo001The character of grace is slowly and fully revealed over the course of the story. It is by definition an external force–active, not passive. It cannot be shaped by human hands but rather, shapes that which it encounters. It is a gift that gives selflessly, continuously, and indiscriminately. And it is powerful. Indeed, through the film’s characters, circumstances, choices, and relationships, we are given a front row seat to the transforming power of grace on the willing heart. It is the light that guides, connecting oceans in which souls would otherwise be easily lost.

The Light Between Oceans offers a very human story which unapologetically mirrors the human existence: a balance between darkness (tragedy, confusion, death, inexplicable life events, and the enduring consequences of personal choice) and light (breathtaking beauty, joy, and wonder). Perhaps it is the film’s relentless picture of pain, grief, and man’s capacity for evil that makes its themes of beauty and forgiveness so vivid and meaningful.
 
Really?! Bradem must have a very strong mind!

Violence, rough.....all these are like you add great deal of chill , pepper, beef , chicken, pork, herbs , cheese, pineapples , olive all into one 8' pizza - rather strong taste and hard to chew

It's true it's a punch on the face, that's the essence of the movie. I think that's right what Scott wanted us to perceive. Insistently maybe, but... Yeah, you may like it or not. Personally, violence disturbs me, but luckily I found also some good parts in the movie, which was heavy btw, yeah.
 
It's true it's a punch on the face, that's the essence of the movie. I think that's right what Scott wanted us to perceive. Insistently maybe, but... Yeah, you may like it or not. Personally, violence disturbs me, but luckily I found also some good parts in the movie, which was heavy btw, yeah.

Too much violence, including verbal are really disturbing. Never developed a strong taste in floods and movie.
 
Wondering even the actors don't know the whole story. I am imaging they were not given full scripts, today received 2 pages tomorrow got another 3 pages and the filming didn't follow sequel etc.
the best part is the actors mostly likely have no idea at all about how much scene time they will have in the final product.

Michael has already done something like that in Fish Tank with Andrea Arnold: she didn't give her actors a full script. And that was REAAAALLY interesting cos the final product was wonderful. I loved Fish Tank with all my heart. But there weren't so many actors, it was something more experimental and so the atmosphere was quieter. I bet Michael's screen time was longer than in Weightless.. I really don't know tho...

But yeah reading the actors opinions on their upcoming movie (Rooney, Michael, Ryan..) they were all a bit "???" about their screen time, the release date, everything. I think Malick didn't tell them anything [emoji23]
 
http://www.reelworldtheology.com/review-the-light-between-oceans/ review / no spoilers

"these pauses ....... can be appreciated most by a viewer who is prepared to enjoy a story that blooms rather than springs open. This slow-burn narrative can be a shock to the system of those used to a flashy, fluffy, fast-paced culture of entertainment, but how appropriate for the film to reflect the very human pace of the people and relationships on which it focuses." .

Gosh this review sounds exactly up my street and how I'd hoped TLBO would be! [emoji2]

The extract above mirrors my suspicions about those who found the film "too slow". It won't be everyone's cup of tea but those of us who like to immerse and lose ourselves in such films will love it I'm sure! [emoji7][emoji7]
 
  • Like
Reactions: carmencrem
Gosh this review sounds exactly up my street and how I'd hoped TLBO would be! [emoji2]

The extract above mirrors my suspicions about those who found the film "too slow". It won't be everyone's cup of tea but those of us who like to immerse and lose ourselves in such films will love it I'm sure! [emoji7][emoji7]

Lol you and Selayang would like this tho; the second one (!!):
IMG_1472561716.570919.jpg
IMG_1472561755.045148.jpg
I never saw Cianfrance as a sort of Malick, he's more "real". Way more real. I think they're pretty opposite. But maybe this time it was the cinematography and the gorgeous landscape.. [emoji57]
 
  • Like
Reactions: pearlyqueen
Gosh this review sounds exactly up my street and how I'd hoped TLBO would be! [emoji2]

The extract above mirrors my suspicions about those who found the film "too slow". It won't be everyone's cup of tea but those of us who like to immerse and lose ourselves in such films will love it I'm sure! [emoji7][emoji7]

Yeah it's difficult this movie will get only positive reviews.
I'm pretty sure they'll praise the cast and cinematography (not so sure about the script/directing bc I haven't seen it yet and most of all bc every negative review was more about the directing part and the script/plot than the performances) but I'm not sure everybody's gonna like it. It's okay! [emoji1316][emoji2]
Romances are often a bit underrated nowadays, and many people find them boring (I just don't know HOWWWW) or just non interesting enough. But luckily the movie brings up other important issues too ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Selayang430
Lol you and Selayang would like this tho;
I never saw Cianfrance as a sort of Malick, he's more "real". Way more real. I think they're pretty opposite. But maybe this time it was the cinematography and the gorgeous landscape.. [emoji57]

Ok! Thanks. It seems the pace of the story a bit slow to some people. Nowadays we use to fast pace story telling and can't blame some will feel it too slow. Fair enough.
 
Thanks ! I saw some too but didn't snapshot it. If happens to see some will post it here. We want to know why people like it and why people don't. It is just not about the good news only.

I posted that video of that guy who didn't like the movie (except for the fact he thought the story was set during WWII) and another pair of things. I didn't share bad reviews clearly written with bitter comments about the actors like that one "I hope fassbender dies".
[emoji848]
And I didn't even post all the great reviews... There were so many and as much as I love them, I can't keep ALWAYS posting ALWAYS those "oh amazing movie and actors!" cause well, we already know, nothing special. I posted few of those but... Well.. Useless [emoji13]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Selayang430
Ok! Thanks. It seems the pace of the story a bit slow to some people. Nowadays we use to fast pace story telling and can't blame some will feel it too slow. Fair enough.

As Derek, Michael and Alicia said, it's an old fashioned story and an old fashioned movie. Cianfrance is also an old-fashioned director in some ways.
His movies are psychological-sentimental-sweet and pretty long/slow. This doesn't mean "boring", tho. It depends. Some can find them boring, some can love them. It's again a matter of tastes.
Personally I loved Blue Valentine, one of my favourite movies ever, I remember seeing it with my mom and crying our eyes out; I liked but not as much as BV also TPBTP and I admit it's true, Cianfrance loves to portray love and family on screen, especially those secrets and personal intimate things inside families, which is something I love. But it's not for everyone, obviously. I'm sure there'll be people disappointed by the movie. It would be surprising and impossible the contrary. [emoji6]

And it's true nowadays most of the movies are made of many many short scenes and poor dialogues and/or feelings.

That's why I loved ADM: not so many scenes but quite long with deep conversations in it and beautiful colours/movements of the actors. Clever underrated movie, too underrated. Also by critics.

TLBO is gonna be different btw: more feelings and breathtaking scenes than difficult dialogues/brain stuff. More heart than brain I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Selayang430
I posted that video of that guy who didn't like the movie (except for the fact he thought the story was set during WWII) and another pair of things. I didn't share bad reviews clearly written with bitter comments about the actors like that one "I hope fassbender dies".
[emoji848]
And I didn't even post all the great reviews... There were so many and as much as I love them, I can't keep ALWAYS posting ALWAYS those "oh amazing movie and actors!" cause well, we already know, nothing special. I posted few of those but... Well.. Useless [emoji13]

Good. Those emotional and poisonous reviews as well as those simply shouting amazing can be left out. It is like the Olympics diving rating system - filter out the lowest and highest rating
 
  • Like
Reactions: carmencrem
Top