i've actually thought about this with the introduction of the josephine and emilie wallets. i realize that these are lower cost wallets, but compare them to the sarah and quality is clearly different. whereas before you could take sarah and put it next to a wallet that cost much more, and quality was comparable, imo.
i should not feel that any quality has been compromised just because i've chosen an item that costs less. because costing less is relative to lv terms, and thus still means that its not a small amount by any means. for reason, i feel that i should not have this feeling that i do, that josephine and emilie just don't compare to something like sarah, zippy, etc.
other that this recent example though, i really can't think of another instance or a personal experience that has made me think that lv quality has gone down. i'm not sure what you're talking about with your speedy. i have two and think the quality on my bags are superb.
i've also had my nf for 10mths, use it pretty much everyday for school so it gets a lot of wear, and no loose threads or any other problems. your's may be an isolated case?
i should not feel that any quality has been compromised just because i've chosen an item that costs less. because costing less is relative to lv terms, and thus still means that its not a small amount by any means. for reason, i feel that i should not have this feeling that i do, that josephine and emilie just don't compare to something like sarah, zippy, etc.
other that this recent example though, i really can't think of another instance or a personal experience that has made me think that lv quality has gone down. i'm not sure what you're talking about with your speedy. i have two and think the quality on my bags are superb.
i've also had my nf for 10mths, use it pretty much everyday for school so it gets a lot of wear, and no loose threads or any other problems. your's may be an isolated case?