TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I think LV does an excellent job making their brand so famous and successful. The good indication, abeit very bad one, is that there are so many fakes on street. That alone is enough as a clear indication that most ppl, if not all, accept LV as one of the most famous and luxury brand of handbags. In my mind and limited experiences with handbags, I would rate them as follow:
1) Hermes
2) LV and Chanel
3) Gucci and Dior
4) etc.
I'm sure there are many brands out there that I've never heard of and don't even know exists. But I'm sure for most normal ppl, LV is the top of the luxury handbag. It is like Rolex which is the most well-known and successful luxury watch brand but is considered by most watch collectors as a mid/high range brand (PP, AP, and Vacheron being the top brands for most ppl).
i dont like this argument at all.wow, i know there are alot of LV lovers here, but i honestly (no offense) do NOT consider their bags to be "all that." to me, LV is SUPER HIGH SCHOOL/freshman yr of college.
i think the fact that there are a million LV fakes and "Everyone" seem to be carrying LV something (even those without any style) is such a BIG TURN OFF for me. And, quite frankly, i dont think LV has been producing any impressive designs neither. all their new things are just some modifications of the monogram...its quite depressing.
That is so true - when I see a Birkin or a Kelly, I think OMG that bag is so expensive and Hermes is such a powerhouse of fashion!!! but I don't really like the style, it just looks rich and famous and I'm not attracted to it for the right reasons. At least I know it.I'd put Chanel ahead of LV and maybe some Bottegas are there as well. There's a GORGEOUS new Chanel coming out this F/W retailing for $14k.
Hermes is at the top of the food chain, but I don't care for them . . . the priciest isn't always the most beautiful to everyone!