Because you can buy a full set fake "mini Kelly" to your specs for $800 that will pass muster through a webcam, probably $400 so long as you don't get too close to certain details.I was scrolling through my Instagram feed and it's crazy how many Instagram era actually post carrying a birkin or a Kelly, and it's not just the basic colours. They post in mauve or magnolia or others that are quite interesting.
Im curious but how is this possible? For some reason, it makes me disappointed with how many people have it on social media that makes me wonder about the legitimacy of the "exclusivity". It's more common online than other luxury brands. So either their posting fakes or they just got easy access to it because of their social media following? Please enlighten me and thoughts on this as well.
That's how "influencers" turn up with 10,000 pink MKs while actual Hermès buyers with real store relationships patiently wait for pretty much any color.
There are also quite a few folks who have family money and want to be influencers, so they buy like crazy to build their unboxings, etc., and what they can't get at boutique they buy at resale. They're never going to tell you they paid Madison Avenue Couture $35K for that HSS bag - they're going to give you a big song and dance about the special order experience.
I disagree that H is more common online than Chanel or LV. The influencer world is particularly riddled with Chanel, which is *much* easier to buy at boutique and also heavily and unfortunately realistically faked.