ID This Coach item! -- Post any Coach item name questions here! --

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I don't have any information on this but it reminds me of the Girlie hobos from around the same time.

I thought of the Girlie Hobos also because I have a couple of them, and they were often made of lamb and they all have that small black and silver hangtag.
Thank you both.

As @katev pointed out, the trim is also lamb. The creed also describes the trim as lamb nappa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: katev
d9d9c4e59a091e8517f054a60d5fb729.jpg


Can anyone provide more information about this bag? Whateve posted about it a while ago, but I couldn't find any follow-up. Please let me know! Thank you!
 
d9d9c4e59a091e8517f054a60d5fb729.jpg


Can anyone provide more information about this bag? Whateve posted about it a while ago, but I couldn't find any follow-up. Please let me know! Thank you!
I answered you in the vintage chat thread. At the time I got it, I had a private discussion with a collector. She had never seen this style before either. Have you seen another?
 
Do you think it's a Bonnie Cashin for Meyers?

I found this Pinterest image to an eBay listing:
IMG_2789.jpg

The photos are gone but this was the item description:


IMG_2788.jpg
It was listing no:
IMG_2790.jpg

The style reminds me of the mailsac a little

I answered you in the vintage chat thread. At the time I got it, I had a private discussion with a collector. She had never seen this style before either. Have you seen another?
 
On second thought the leather on this eBay listing seems more pebbled though than your bag and the strap details are different. I wonder if this was a prototype for Coach based on the Meyers bag that didn't get produced?

Do you think it's a Bonnie Cashin for Meyers?

I found this Pinterest image to an eBay listing:
View attachment 4334207

The photos are gone but this was the item description:


View attachment 4334206
It was listing no:
View attachment 4334208

The style reminds me of the mailsac a little
Do you think it's a Bonnie Cashin for Meyers?

I found this Pinterest image to an eBay listing:
View attachment 4334207

The photos are gone but this was the item description:


View attachment 4334206
It was listing no:
View attachment 4334208

The style reminds me of the mailsac a little
 
On second thought the leather on this eBay listing seems more pebbled though than your bag and the strap details are different. I wonder if this was a prototype for Coach based on the Meyers bag that didn't get produced?

I just purchased this bag from a friend on Instagram so I’m wanting more info
 

Attachments

  • E671868C-2A5F-47B4-B696-AEB5EA3F7C79.jpeg
    E671868C-2A5F-47B4-B696-AEB5EA3F7C79.jpeg
    187 KB · Views: 120
  • D194B5BA-E061-4D99-BF58-51C7188D81BC.jpeg
    D194B5BA-E061-4D99-BF58-51C7188D81BC.jpeg
    185.5 KB · Views: 119
  • 65EA2153-C3B5-43DD-8D91-0EA45F362463.jpeg
    65EA2153-C3B5-43DD-8D91-0EA45F362463.jpeg
    225.7 KB · Views: 120
  • AC6DA526-1768-4177-A9A0-E70A71EB6B31.jpeg
    AC6DA526-1768-4177-A9A0-E70A71EB6B31.jpeg
    226.5 KB · Views: 119
Thanks! How do you know? Is it because of the serial number? Because this post says the xxx-xxxx serial number format stopped in the late 80's?

As we've mentioned many times here, relying on posts that you dig up on the internet is a good way to get incorrect or out of date information.

Examples from the post you referred to:
"Older bags and lovely vintage finds will be a bit more difficult since the serial number on the creed was not introduced until the late 1960's to early 1970's."
WRONG, Coach didn't start stamping serial numbers under the creeds until right around 1980 or maybe a year or two earlier. That's why NO Bonnie Cashin bags made during her partnership with Coach which ended in 1974 have serial numbers OR creeds. Whateve can probably supply fairly close dates for those changes. It's hard to give exact dates, but even the glued-on serial numbers which were the first kind Coach used don't seem to have come into use until the late 1970s, and stamped creeds without numbers came in only a few years before that.

" A switch in the format of the serial number came about in the late 80's. Where before it was "###-####" now they became "####-###."
NOT QUITE, the format was changed in 1990. And a few bags made around 1991-92 also use the older serial number format for some unknown reason.

The same blogger also posted authenticating information. Another mistake:
"There is a misconception that the pattern must match at the seams. This is not true, what is true is that the pattern will always be centered."
WRONG, quite a few lines like the Signature Optics, Scarf prints, and even a few Sig Messengers and several others don't have centered C patterns. A few styles have centered Cs on the front but not the back.
Here's a 70077 Heritage Stripe Crossbody right from the old Drilldown that doesn't have a centered pattern, examples of this style can still be found on Ebay too,
70077_HERITAGE STRIPE CROSSBODY-khm1_a0_front.jpg


The Salearea Guides are accurate, up to date, and available at the top of every Coach Shopping forum index page. Please use those and not random internet "guides".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Catbird9 and katev
As we've mentioned many times here, relying on posts that you dig up on the internet is a good way to get incorrect or out of date information.

Examples from the post you referred to:
"Older bags and lovely vintage finds will be a bit more difficult since the serial number on the creed was not introduced until the late 1960's to early 1970's."
WRONG, Coach didn't start stamping serial numbers under the creeds until right around 1980 or maybe a year or two earlier. That's why NO Bonnie Cashin bags made during her partnership with Coach which ended in 1974 have serial numbers OR creeds. Whateve can probably supply fairly close dates for those changes. It's hard to give exact dates, but even the glued-on serial numbers which were the first kind Coach used don't seem to have come into use until the late 1970s, and stamped creeds without numbers came in only a few years before that.

" A switch in the format of the serial number came about in the late 80's. Where before it was "###-####" now they became "####-###."
NOT QUITE, the format was changed in 1990. And a few bags made around 1991-92 also use the older serial number format for some unknown reason.

The same blogger also posted authenticating information. Another mistake:
"There is a misconception that the pattern must match at the seams. This is not true, what is true is that the pattern will always be centered."
WRONG, quite a few lines like the Signature Optics, Scarf prints, and even a few Sig Messengers and several others don't have centered C patterns. A few styles have centered Cs on the front but not the back.
Here's a 70077 Heritage Stripe Crossbody right from the old Drilldown that doesn't have a centered pattern, examples of this style can still be found on Ebay too,
View attachment 4334488


The Salearea Guides are accurate, up to date, and available at the top of every Coach Shopping forum index page. Please use those and not random internet "guides".

I'm not sure what Sale Area guides you're talking about. I don't see them here:
upload_2019-2-8_10-49-19.png

And, I googled it and found this https://forum.purseblog.com/threads/salearea-guides.983575/, but that seems to disagree with what you said "the format was changed in 1990" when the Sale Area says, " Somewhere around 1989-1990 they changed to 4 numbers, the dash and 3 numbers (No 1234-567)" - which neither matches with what you said nor the blog I found. Is there a link to it on PurseForum somewhere? You'll have to forgive me, I understand if you feel like you've said this a million times to other posters, but I'm relatively new to the PurseForum, so I'm not familiar with what has gone in this thread in the past.
 
The same blogger also posted authenticating information. Another mistake:
"There is a misconception that the pattern must match at the seams. This is not true, what is true is that the pattern will always be centered."
WRONG, quite a few lines like the Signature Optics, Scarf prints, and even a few Sig Messengers and several others don't have centered C patterns. A few styles have centered Cs on the front but not the back.
There are even at least 2 styles of "traditional" signature bags on which the pattern is centered and matched on the front (as per "the rule") but uncentered and mismatched on the backs.

Here are a couple of examples of 2 styles from 2006 which break the rule and would probably be reported as fake by the blogger to whom Hyacinth referred. Styles 10482 and 10483 are similar styles, both of which have the same aberrations.

Style 10482:
coach 10482 sig studded hobo front back auth.png

Style 10483:
coach 10483 sig studded hobo front back auth.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catbird9
I'm not sure what Sale Area guides you're talking about. I don't see them here:
View attachment 4334511

And, I googled it and found this https://forum.purseblog.com/threads/salearea-guides.983575/, but that seems to disagree with what you said "the format was changed in 1990" when the Sale Area says, " Somewhere around 1989-1990 they changed to 4 numbers, the dash and 3 numbers (No 1234-567)" - which neither matches with what you said nor the blog I found. Is there a link to it on PurseForum somewhere? You'll have to forgive me, I understand if you feel like you've said this a million times to other posters, but I'm relatively new to the PurseForum, so I'm not familiar with what has gone in this thread in the past.

I purposely left the years a bit vague in the Guides because Coach seldom made changes exactly on January First, and pre-style number serials are notoriously difficult to date exactly. And while I probably should have ignored that one statement by the blogger, the other mistakes I mentioned are more serious and could lead to the correct age of a bag being way off (vintage bags with creeds and even serial numbers being identified as Cashin or Cashin Era are good examples), or a genuine bag being reported as fake because of the C pattern not being centered.

ETA - there's the even more confusing case of a Sig Duffle style 10402 that was originally made with a centered medium C pattern on what I assume was the front and an UNcentered medium C pattern on the back, the side with the zip pocket. That was modified during production to a centered LARGE C pattern on both sides and the addition of an "M" right after the 10402 style code in the serial on some, but not all, of the modified versions.

Original 10402:
10402_Signature Logo Duffle-ORIG-b.JPG 10402_Signature Logo Duffle-ORIG-c.JPG 10402_Signature Logo Duffle-ORIG-d.JPG

Modified 10402M:
10402M_Signature Logo Duffle-remake-b.JPG 10402M_Signature Logo Duffle-remake-c.JPG 10402M_Signature Logo Duffle-remake-g-chezmia.JPG

Proof that "always" and "never" are dangerous words to use in a Coach guide when talking about Rules. "The most consistent thing about Coach is their inconsistency".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Catbird9
Do you think it's a Bonnie Cashin for Meyers?

I found this Pinterest image to an eBay listing:
View attachment 4334207

The photos are gone but this was the item description:


View attachment 4334206
It was listing no:
View attachment 4334208

The style reminds me of the mailsac a little
I found that same Bonnie Cashin for Meyers when I was looking for information about my bag in 2016.
I just purchased this bag from a friend on Instagram so I’m wanting more info
It looks like the same style.
 
Top