If you do a search on tPF this has been discussed before. It was years ago around 2013/14, and the printing does not affect the silk. H did a whole thing romanticising the laser-process (whatever the equivalent of greenwashing is when marketing trad. heritage artisan skills for its 'Luddite' customers). My suspicion is they had beenusing laser printing before that.
It's closer to deceptive marketing, using false or misleading information to incite people to make a purchase... I guess they could say they are showing of an ancient art, but if they are implying the scarves they sell are made that way, it's deceptive marketing. Two LV ads were banned in the UK for suggesting that the products are hand made without machines many years ago. And this is basically the same stuff...
It's closer to deceptive marketing, using false or misleading information to incite people to make a purchase... I guess they could say they are showing of an ancient art, but if they are implying the scarves they sell are made that way, it's deceptive marketing. Two LV ads were banned in the UK for suggesting that the products are hand made without machines many years ago. And this is basically the same stuff...
And they may be doing that for some scarves. Sadly I think several of the brands, but especially Hermes probably are shooting themselves in the foot by trying to garnish, or being less transparent about some of the less luxurious sounding production methods in order to give an uneducated client (looking for information) an easy answer for the sake of story telling, because usually a lot of the nuance is lost and there are items that are produced with a varying degree of manual labor.H still insists they are using screen-printing, which still makes be believe they print reissues the same way as they always did(?)
And they may be doing that for some scarves. Sadly I think several of the brands, but especially Hermes probably are shooting themselves in the foot by trying to garnish, or being less transparent about some of the less luxurious sounding production methods in order to give an uneducated client (looking for information) an easy answer for the sake of story telling, because usually a lot of the nuance is lost and there are items that are produced with a varying degree of manual labor.
All of the big French conglomerates are supporting traditional arts in some ways. But it's not profitable/cost prohibitive if you want living wages, volume, environmentally friendly etc. to use that mode of production for every item, or items that have to be more or less mass produced especially when more efficient ways are yielding a more desirable result or a similar result for the clients. I can't imagine how many complaints over crooked stitching there would be if every luxury bag were hand stitched with saddle stitching solely based on the number of unhappy posts about stitching across this forum. Saddle stitch will inevitably be more uneven and crooked and a hand cut instead of laser cut piece of leather leaves more room for failure. A leather bag assembled with the help of sewing machines still require a lot of craftsmanship and hand finishing, and it is in no way similar to sewing a Zara (or maybe Shein these days?) t-shirt in a fabric that is so cheap that it hardly matters how much of it is lost in the process.
Hermes doesn't make scarves in just one way and they're not even all made in the same place. The Kyoto marble scarves are an example of incredible and rare craftsmanship that are neither silk screened nor printed and that are widely available everything considered. Some of the scarves and textiles at Hermes are dip dyed and hand woven in Asia somewhere (India?).
But I guess the story telling over actual information has been working better so far for these companies selling dreams, so in that context Hermès les ballets de laser-jets is a laudable attempt at something.
Mustn't go OT, but you will see here Scarves Hermes scarves screen print to laserjet print switchover add to that the introduction of ltd CW families for new/reissue designs.
Just a thought, and I have nothing to base this on other than it makes logical sense… H has been working to perfect the double-sided printing technique for years. Less saturation on the reverse would not just be beneficial, it would actually be necessary, for this to work. Perhaps the development of this process has also influenced how the regular print runs occur; thicker inks, faster drying times, or something along those lines?I don't think they would lie. Maybe the machine screen printing causes less saturation on reverse side.
So are you saying the Forever and Re-Issue scarves are the only ones possibly being silk screened. Does anyone really know?