I read a lot of these questions recently in other threads and am genuinely curious on why these questions are asked.
1. when people question the worldwide-linked purchase information, is it because they want to be seen as established customer to the stores outside their home store (and therefore easier to buy bags)? Or the opposite (ie. To get more than alloted bag already bought at home store)?
2. if the home SA cannot procure the goods requested, we should not buy from other stores out of loyalty. But what if the home SA doesn’t deliver? Shouldn't buying from outside also show that we really want the goods and that we do not buy for buying sake?
As background, I buy everything I want from the store or online (but ordered and paid for at the store, as instructed by my SA). I also bought things when I travel as my store has limited inventory. I have no problem getting the bag I want (not quickly, but I do eventually)
Sorry it’s lengthy. I hope my questions are not offensive and I would love to hear the rationale from others.
1. when people question the worldwide-linked purchase information, is it because they want to be seen as established customer to the stores outside their home store (and therefore easier to buy bags)? Or the opposite (ie. To get more than alloted bag already bought at home store)?
2. if the home SA cannot procure the goods requested, we should not buy from other stores out of loyalty. But what if the home SA doesn’t deliver? Shouldn't buying from outside also show that we really want the goods and that we do not buy for buying sake?
As background, I buy everything I want from the store or online (but ordered and paid for at the store, as instructed by my SA). I also bought things when I travel as my store has limited inventory. I have no problem getting the bag I want (not quickly, but I do eventually)
Sorry it’s lengthy. I hope my questions are not offensive and I would love to hear the rationale from others.