I've never owned a pair but noticed a really lovely pair on one of my senior executives recently. 1 day during a meeting, I saw the inside of her shoe and noticed that the SF logo was in a pictoral/blockish lettering rather than a signature. I've always thought it was only a signature so I naturally thought that perhaps the she-boss was wearing a pair of knock-offs -- Oh, ignorance!
But I've been browsing online and noticed that both the logo-ish and the signature-ish ones co-exist.
So I'm wondering if anyone can shed any light on the difference. Is it unique to a certain designs? Unique to a time period it was manufactured in (vintage vs newer models)? Limited to special editions only?
Anyone know the story behind this?
But I've been browsing online and noticed that both the logo-ish and the signature-ish ones co-exist.
So I'm wondering if anyone can shed any light on the difference. Is it unique to a certain designs? Unique to a time period it was manufactured in (vintage vs newer models)? Limited to special editions only?
Anyone know the story behind this?