Okay. I have to put my two cents in now!
Personally I don't think of any decorative material as intrinsically "fake". After all, pearls are cultured, cubic zirconia and moissanites are synthesized, and the leather used for purses is processed.
That being said, materials commonly used as diamond substitutes are not necessarily worn in order to deceive people. I'm sure some people genuinely appreciate cz or moissanite in their own right!
Egalitarianism is a part of the American idiom, and owners of diamonds should not frown upon materials, natural or synthesized, which coincidentally appear similar to their stone of choice.
This is not "fake". This is simply due to the chemistry and inherit optical qualities of various materials.
However, fake designer goods are tasteless, morally wrong, and illegal.
If you love a designer you should save up to buy their authentically crafted leather goods. This includes Goyard, Hermes, Louis Vuitton, all the way down to
Coach.
Fake designer bags are generally of poor quality and purposely *steal* a copyrighted design. In my opinion they are generally bought by people seeking status.
There are plenty of well-designed, unbranded bags on the market.
Some people prefer to wear their jewelry with an aura of playfulness nonprecious materials can provide. It is simply not practical for even the wealthiest individuals to wear nothing but genuine diamonds all the time.
Nor is it practical to carry a designer purse all the time.
So if you don't want to spend money on a designer purse, don't. But don't buy a fake trying to look like you did. Buy legal goods in your price range. They're out there. You will not look "chic" in illicit leather goods. You will only look crass and shallow.
I feel sorry for anyone who would try to pass off any other material but a diamond as a diamond, although they are not disrespecting anyone. They are merely acting childish.
Pirated leather designs and trademark infringements hurt economies, hurt artisanal leathercrafters as well as countless third-world factory workers, and devalues the fashion houses their purchasers claim to love.
Does anyone agree?