Understanding 'leather' is complicated, and so is the naming of
collections. Dooney uses the terminology Florentine leather
and Florentine Leather Collection somewhat interchangeably to
describe the source of the leather (Italian) and the way the leather
is processed, treated, dyed.
It seems that in some collections the term Florentine leather is used
to describe the source of the leather and some of the techniques used
to process the leather. But in these collections there might be other
methods used to enhance/alter the surface of the leather....
a high sheen finish, buffing, or even a light coating, or even the dying process.
These collections often get a specific name, but the description/marketing refers to Florentine leather. That makes it easy to assume it's the same as the leather in the Florentine leather collection.... but in reality, changes in the way the leather is processed,
even if it's only in the final stages, can affect how the leather will look and wear,
and it's characteristics (spotting, scratching, etc.)
I have several Toscana handbags made of Florentine leather. They are beautiful...
however they scratch (and there is no buffing out scratches) and I've gotten
water spots which never fade. The surface of the Toscana leather is smooth,
which leads me to believe it was buffed. I don't know what else is different
about the leather processing.
I don't own any Toledo collection. As I recall it's a high shine leather. Again,
the processing of the leather must have some differences compared to the
way the Florentine Collection is processed. I would also guess that scratches
can't be buffed out on the Toledo collection.