Shari said:
If that is the definition of a "career girl" then guys don't have a HOPE of finding a non-career girl....
I don't think the aritcle is stupid, but I agree with your comment that there are not a lot of people that I would call "career" women who make $30K a year. To me, a "career" woman is someone who is making at least $70K a year.
I'm 29, married and have been with my DH for almost 6 years, but married only a little over 1 year - we're a dual income, no kids couple. Both DH and I are doctors, and even more so than the average couple, are expected to have an extremely high rate of divorce.
I agree with some of the points in the article - people with divorced parents defintely tend to perpetuate the cycle more, that I am less likely to have a ton of kids in tow, etc...
But it's also a man problem too. Men "claim" they want smart, intelligent women, but I remember when I was still dating in my early 20's, most men were
totally intimidated by the fact I was in medicine and have significantly more earning power. I remember my friends and I had WAY better luck with men by pretending we were nurses or hairdressers, which I guess men perceived to be more fun/less intimidating/ whatever...
Psychologically, people tend to marry people similar to their parents as there is this tendency to replay familiar family dynamics either b/c of familiarity or as an attempt to try and "correct/master" the elements that were dysfunctional in the past. It doesn't always work - hence repeating the cycle of divorce. Same reason I see men possibly wanting the SAHM/SAHW, which may explain the lower divorce rate... and also the fact that if you're at home, you in theory have fewer opportunities to meet new people to cheat with.
IDK - this whole thought puts women in a vulnerable spot - one reason why I would never be a SAHW. First off, I've spent too much time/effort in my work so far, but also, I would never want to be in that spot where if we separate, where I am now struggling to make ends meet after having had a career lapse for 'x' years.