I thought this analyst view was kind of spot on - comparing this to when JC Penny tried this.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101776782
That is scary that Coach is being compared to JCP. I don't think they are quite there yet. What I love about all these analysts is they say Coach shouldn't do this and shouldn't do that but offer no insight on what they think Coach should do. Before someone points out that they are analysts and not CEOs I get that, but I would still be interested in hearing some suggestions from the talking heads. Curious if they have some of the same suggestions we do. Funny how the article called out the siggy bags and Coach says they are "moving away from siggy" but have resurrected the siggy lining.
Someone brought up that most people do not know the difference between MFF and FP. And they are right. So let's say Joan comes to the office with a Coach leather bag. It is MFF. She does not know it, her office buddies don't know the difference. And let's say Joan's bag has that plasticky feel that some MFF bags have. Now the office buddies are surprised that Coach quality has "gone down". So office buddy sees Coach bags on the website for $400, $600 etc. She thinks back to Jane's bag and does not think a Coach bag is worth that price and passes on it.
They seriously have a perception problem. I have been saying for years that they need to name their MFF something different like See by Chloe etc. They will never rebuild the full price brand until they do this.