Clash de Cartier

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

#1,726
Yodabest said:
I’ll start by saying this is a GOOD problem to have. :rolleyes:
I have and love the clash and JUC. I personally prefer the clash without diamonds. To me the diamonds take away from the look. The JUC is where you want the diamonds….. and if you’re looking for contrast like your husband suggested, go with the rose gold JUC with diamonds.
That paired with the clash set would be beautiful!
Click to expand...
Thank you so much. That helps a looooot
 
#1,728
cartierloverjs said:
Saw these new edition on Cartier China website. Glad I have been waiting… always good to just get the diamond version based on my past experience. The ring price should be around $5,850. They also have the earrings and necklsce version.
Click to expand...
This ring is now listed on US website. $5,900. The price looks lower compared to the Love pave ring three rows. Both have 88 diamonds totalling 0.31 carat. Also found a comparison photo on social media with the plain version.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0711.jpeg
    IMG_0711.jpeg
    76.1 KB · Views: 376
  • IMG_0710.jpeg
    IMG_0710.jpeg
    122.7 KB · Views: 391
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: angelyn_kyle19, thundercloud, lill_canele and 4 others
#1,729
cartierloverjs said:
This ring is now listed on US website. $5,900. The price looks lower compared to the Love pave ring three rows. Both have 88 diamonds totalling 0.31 carat. Also found a comparison photo on social media with the plain version.
Click to expand...
I plan to get a Clash ring, but this new diamond one has me intrigued!! Where did you find this on SM? Thanks!
 
#1,734
Tbala said:
I just got the new clash ring with diamonds (pave style) and it is absolutely stunning. I think this version of diamond clash is much prettier than the original diamond design. Here's a few pics of my recent stack:View attachment 5889896View attachment 5889897
Click to expand...

Absolutely stunning!!! Does it look less “rose gold” more “yellow gold” , since diamonds replace lots of surface?
 
#1,736
Tbala said:
I just got the new clash ring with diamonds (pave style) and it is absolutely stunning. I think this version of diamond clash is much prettier than the original diamond design. Here's a few pics of my recent stack:View attachment 5889896View attachment 5889897
Click to expand...
Gorgeous! I am debating this very ring. Not sure if it’s worth the price difference between this and the plain one. What made you opt for this one instead of the plain?
 
#1,738
nycmamaofone said:
Gorgeous! I am debating this very ring. Not sure if it’s worth the price difference between this and the plain one. What made you opt for this one instead of the plain?
Click to expand...
So I tried on both and it was literally just NO CONTEST once I had the diamond version on--I couldn't get past it. It is just so beautiful on and stunning in person. I also felt that the diamond perhaps took some edge away from the piece and made it slightly more feminine--if that is at all possible!
 
  • Like
Reactions: allure244, Emily1830, vivaciousbev1 and 1 other person
#1,740
Tbala said:
So I tried on both and it was literally just NO CONTEST once I had the diamond version on--I couldn't get past it. It is just so beautiful on and stunning in person. I also felt that the diamond perhaps took some edge away from the piece and made it slightly more feminine--if that is at all possible!
Click to expand...
Are the diamonds noticeable? I noticed the diamonds are a lot smaller than on the pave pieces - or not sure if it’s just on a more complicated design (not flat)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top