Charlie Hunnam

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

#932
lillygurl said:
That rings been around for awhile and seems to come and go. Seems to keep people guessing though.
Click to expand...

In this case, without the other rings on other fingers, it seems to me he is making a clearer public statement of commitment. He is seriously all dressed up and looking intent on making a good impression. That is the only symbol of commitment to one woman that he is showing to the world on that day. Even if he intends never to marry again (get a legal marriage certificate or a religious ceremony) he is saying this is who I am, to those of us who understand the ring symbolism. So I am going to accept this as his message to me, anyway!

They have been together long enough to make it a 'legal' arrangement in my state, but I don't know about California. Correction, now I do know about California:

"In California, the court recognizes palimony (Marvin claim). This means that if a couple lives together for an extended period of time and splits, he or she may have a right to receive support and/or a right to certain property acquired during the relationship."
 
Last edited:
#933
Zorro1 said:
In this case, without the other rings on other fingers, it seems to me he is making a clearer public statement of commitment. He is seriously all dressed up and looking intent on making a good impression. That is the only symbol of commitment to one woman that he is showing to the world on that day. Even if he intends never to marry again (get a legal marriage certificate or a religious ceremony) he is saying this is who I am, to those of us who understand the ring symbolism.

They have been together long enough to make it a 'legal' arrangement in my state, but I don't know about California. If he were to die without a will, would have legal rights?

So I am going to accept this as his message to me, anyway!
Click to expand...

You got all that from one picture?
 
#934
Zorro1 said:
In this case, without the other rings on other fingers, it seems to me he is making a clearer public statement of commitment. He is seriously all dressed up and looking intent on making a good impression. That is the only symbol of commitment to one woman that he is showing to the world on that day. Even if he intends never to marry again (get a legal marriage certificate or a religious ceremony) he is saying this is who I am, to those of us who understand the ring symbolism. So I am going to accept this as his message to me, anyway!

They have been together long enough to make it a 'legal' arrangement in my state, but I don't know about California. Correction, now I do know about California:

"In California, the court recognizes palimony (Marvin claim). This means that if a couple lives together for an extended period of time and splits, he or she may have a right to receive support and/or a right to certain property acquired during the relationship."
Click to expand...

Out of genuine interest. Why do you think he is trying to send any message? He's wearing a ring(s) for years now, why is it suddenly so important on which finger they are or what they symbolise?

Ejm1059 said:
You got all that from one picture?
Click to expand...

Sherlock?
 
#936
gemini582 said:
I'm so confused by all this ring talk. Did something happen recently? I've never paid that much attention to them but I thought he always had rings on.
Click to expand...

tumblr_mcw42aDaJ51ri9yduo1_500.gif


Exactly nothing happened. That's why I'm as confused as you are why we talk about his rings for almost a week now.
 
#938
Just because that is what the picture means to me. Isn't this all fantasy anyway? That is just what I see when I look at the picture. I don't care if you agree or not. I am not putting it out there as fact, just sitting here drinking coffee and thinking out loud. I thought maybe you all might be interested in what I think, but I guess not.

Excuuuuuuuuuuuuse me!
 
#940
I think for some of his fans his wearing a ring that looks like a wedding band and wearing it on his left hand generates interest. I saw some posts on FB and Twitter with fans wondering the same thing. I think there's always going to be speculation about that ring.
 
#942
Zorro1, lillygurl and I speculated about the rings and were chastized by some. We are all different people and have the right to our own opinions. As yet, we don't have dictators to tell us what to think. Each fan has his or hers ideas, and that is why there are so many of us trying to decide what he is all about. You don't just wear a ring or anything else usually; most things are symbolic to us for one reason or another. I think about why the ring. I read on a post on Tumblr where the person said "Morgana hasn't worn hers (talking about the ring) since 2009. Guess it means something to others besides us. I don't care how silly I may sound to others - I don't admire petulance either but, like others, I abide it.
 
#943
Zorro1 said:
In this case, without the other rings on other fingers, it seems to me he is making a clearer public statement of commitment. He is seriously all dressed up and looking intent on making a good impression. That is the only symbol of commitment to one woman that he is showing to the world on that day. Even if he intends never to marry again (get a legal marriage certificate or a religious ceremony) he is saying this is who I am, to those of us who understand the ring symbolism. So I am going to accept this as his message to me, anyway!

They have been together long enough to make it a 'legal' arrangement in my state, but I don't know about California. Correction, now I do know about California:

"In California, the court recognizes palimony (Marvin claim). This means that if a couple lives together for an extended period of time and splits, he or she may have a right to receive support and/or a right to certain property acquired during the relationship."
Click to expand...



That was the case that was before the courts when Lee Marvin's (actor) long time live in girlfriend sued him and won. That is where the name "palimony" originated from. That ruling changed things forever for people in long term relationships. Thanks to that you now have prenups.
 
#944
I omitted some words in my post concerning the rings. The line "You don't just wear a ring or anything else:" Should have read "You don't just wear a ring or anything else for no reason."
 
#945
Check on theecharliehunnam page, first tweet, go to large pic. Under this pic, the main topic for several inputs is ""THE RING." Guess we aren't the only people thinking about "THE RING."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top