Good questionI agree with one of the comments here that the boy and 19 are completely different bags. And agree that structure is why the boy has reached house signature status: because it retains its shape and beauty better, which affects value. I think when you start going for the mega expensive brands like Chanel, investment mindset comes into play whether directly or indirectly and bag structure is one thing to consider.
I got my new medium boy this year from a personal shopper. And it’s everything I dreamed about. It’s surprisingly very easy to lug around except that the strap falls off my shoulders (like my other bags lol). It’s also very versatile; can be worn on a casual stroll to a special dinner.
I was worried that it will be heavy and stiff like what some tubers are saying, but I find it particularly pliable; it’s just structured, not stiff. My boy is made in France.
View attachment 5254817
Which brings me to this question: any notable difference between France and Italy-made Chanels? Which one do you like the most?

When I was choosing my Boy, I was looking at the leather first and foremost (like most of us would do). If I recall correctly, at the time there were 3 Boys to choose from - 2 had a very shiny caviar and extremely puffy quilts and the third one was just right (in my eyes) - not too shiny but also not a dull caviar and not extremely puffy but also not flat quilts. The third Boy was just perfect (matter of personal preference of course as a lot of people prefer very shiny leather and extremely puffy quilts) and as luck would have it - it was made in France and the other 2 were made in Italy. I went with my preferred choice of leather and having it made in France ended up been a lovely bonus.
Last edited: