so I revisited this thread and saw some of the really great posts from so black boys calfskin owners too, and couldn’t resist posting a perspective that just came to mind that may be relevant for those still considering this comparison.
Here’s a way to look at this (full disclosure I’m a total hopeless addict and enabler so if you need something to just push you over the edge, here it is, read on
)
Imo, chanel was able to successfully navigate its timeless elegance with modern edginess when certain boy bags were done right and totally demonstrate that vibe perfectly. You may prefer the grained lamb, you may prefer the calf, but heres the thing... no matter which one is avail if you look at each of these options on their own instead of comparing, seriously is it a problem?
I mean you may prefer grained lamb for durability, but if you love the so black boy for durability, is calf not durable? Other brands don’t offer caviar leather and we happily buy them in calfskin, so.... ? Calfskin also dials up the suppleness of the leather a bit look wise and that’s not a bad thing. The so black makes the boy bag look so edgy imo under both leather types and if you are lucky to locate one and love the so black line, is either one a bad choice really?
I personally prefer the grained lamb but I thought if I didn’t have one already and the calfskin shows up, honestly I don’t think I would turn it down because it wasn’t grained lamb
Just a thought.., and it seems like both grained lamb and calfskin Owners are quite happy with their so black boys so why not? Unless you see the calf or lamb and personally has a dislike of one specifically and it’s a matter of personal strong like or dislike ?