that’s a great observation, and you’re absolutely right that VCA does use unheated sapphires in some of their exceptional high jewelry pieces. for example, the Plume d’autruche ring, which features a 29.88 carats Kashmir sapphire, is almost certainly unheated. Kashmir sapphires are prized for their velvety color caused by internal silk-like inclusions, which would be destroyed by heat. so heating would not only diminish the stone’s value, it would go against what makes a Kashmir sapphire special in the first place. at this level, unheated is the default, even if not explicitly stated on the website (they even omitted the Kashmir description here though it's present on their now-abandoned Tumblr account)
View attachment 6160197
that said, it’s interesting to note that even in cases like this, VCA doesn’t always explicitly state “unheated” in public-facing descriptions. treatment details, especially for high-value stones, are typically confirmed privately via lab certificates (GIA, SSEF, Gübelin, etc.) shared during private viewings or upon purchase
so for pieces in the fine jewelry collections like Two Butterfly, unless the sapphire is specifically described as unheated, it's quite likely that standard heat treatment has been applied. this is a widely accepted practice in fine jewelry, and VCA still maintains an incredibly high threshold for color, clarity, and stone quality, even for treated gems
more broadly, VCA tends to withhold technical gemology terms from their public materials. for instance, while it's well understood among gemologists that the blue agate used in the Alhambra collection is dyed (like I mentioned above), VCA never uses that word on their website (and even when you ask their customer service; I tried). similarly, they rarely mention whether a sapphire is heated or unheated unless it’s a major selling point in high jewelry. their language leans more toward storytelling and design inspiration, leaving the gemological specifics for certification or client conversations