Authenticate this Hermes **BAG** Archived 07/31/10

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Status
Not open for further replies.
#601
Item: AUTHENTIC HERMES BLACK BIRKIN 35CM TOGO BAG Pre Owned
Listing nunber: 370359279627
Seller: chocolate_crocodile
Link: http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI...-All-Categories&_fvi=1&_rdc=1#ht_11519wt_1165
Comments: Have additional pics from the seller. Is it authentic?
Thanks
Lock2keys.jpg

12.jpg

vcvcvxcv.jpg

DSC04914.jpg
 
Last edited:
#602
beatriz_ingrid said:
:yahoo: :happydance: oh thank you so much Perlerare, you are heaven sent. I don't really mind whether it's Rouge Vif or Rouge H for as long as its red Togo AUTHENTIC 35cm Birkin w/ GHW. I will ask the seller to send me additional pics as you stated before I purchase this.
Click to expand...

Seller in description calls the leather "taurillon clement" so double check the leather too
 
#603
perlerare said:
The bag looks authentic to me.
I wonder how the two set of pictures can be so much different from one another. ( I have checked very carefully, it is the same bag, though)
You have to make sure about the color. Is it Rouge Vif ? or Rouge H ?
From the listing pictures it looks Rouge vif.
From the additional pics in the album, it looks Rouge H.

If I were interested in buying this bag, I would ask the seller to shoot another set of pictures, with macro function on, no flash, in the natural day light.
Front, back, bottom, blindstamp, side.....

Oh, and one more thing : the bag was extensively used. Not just "very rarely" as stated by seller.
Click to expand...

Agree on all fronts--am equally confused by the differences between the 2 sets of photos.
It looks more like togo in the listing, and clemence in the additional album photos. Rouge vif and rouge H are very different, so, you should confirm which it is before you buy it. If it is rouge vif, then I would say it is probably clemence.
 
#605
#607
amd_tan, there are issues regarding honesty with this seller and even if this bag were to prove to be authentic, there is no guarantee that you would get the authentic bag. I would pass based on this alone.

BHmommy Not carzy about this bag either and would have to see it in person.

beatriz_ingrid To be honest, I am not seeing rouge vif or rouge H. It is looking much brighter to me. I am not seeing pinkish stitching either. Perhaps it is how the leather took the dye. However, I really do not think it is rouge H.
 
#608
amd_tan said:
Item: AUTHENTIC HERMES BLACK BIRKIN 35CM TOGO BAG Pre Owned
Listing nunber: 370359279627
Seller: chocolate_crocodile
Link: http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI...-All-Categories&_fvi=1&_rdc=1#ht_11519wt_1165
Comments: Have additional pics from the seller. Is it authentic?
Thanks
Click to expand...

There is no evidence that the additional pictures are from the bag on he listing.
The bag seen on the listing pictures is not convincing me, and anyway, the last picture of the listing shows a part of a fake bag. That's all I can say about the bag.

About the seller, there would be a lot to say but I do not think it is even needed at this point.
 
#609
Item: Kelly 32
Listing number: don't know
Seller: Catherine B
Link:
Comments: Hi,please help me authentificate this Kelly 32 white , bought from a reseller boutique in Paris .The boutique is quite known but just to make sure .Thank you very much for your time.

Here are links :

http://i43.tinypic.com/2r7rl9s.jpg

http://i39.tinypic.com/4hwe8k.jpg

http://i43.tinypic.com/20k2k9c.jpg

http://i41.tinypic.com/1zm00ub.jpg

http://i41.tinypic.com/eknhxk.jpg

http://i42.tinypic.com/hsp5pk.jpg

http://i42.tinypic.com/jtxf2s.jpg

http://i40.tinypic.com/j88.jpg

http://i43.tinypic.com/4vg5ro.jpg

http://i44.tinypic.com/29kq982.jpg

http://i44.tinypic.com/y2nvs.jpg

http://i41.tinypic.com/52x3ea.jpg

http://i43.tinypic.com/34pxlro.jpg
 
Last edited:
#611
I bought it bag from H store and would like to auth it here as requested by one of the mod.

BIRKIN 35
LEATHER: TAURILLON CLEMENCE
COLOUR: BLANC/ORANGE (orange interior and orange trim on both side and bottom of the bag)
with silver fitting
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4625.JPG
    IMG_4625.JPG
    76.7 KB · Views: 64
  • IMG_4626.JPG
    IMG_4626.JPG
    79.3 KB · Views: 63
  • IMG_4627.JPG
    IMG_4627.JPG
    86 KB · Views: 61
  • IMG_4628.JPG
    IMG_4628.JPG
    106.7 KB · Views: 59
  • IMG_4630.JPG
    IMG_4630.JPG
    60.2 KB · Views: 54
#613
gracekelly said:
denisdo, with all the pix you put up, some are completely worthless in my opinion. How a nice clean frontal shot of the bag and the stamping.
Click to expand...

:idea: sorry abt those photos ,I'm a little mess up with the flash of my camera .Here is the frontal of the bag and the stamp says 34.S with a I on the first photo .Maybe you can help me to authenticate it :smile1: thanks

http://i42.tinypic.com/ogb61f.png
 
Last edited:
#614
CHLOESS. Your pix are taken from too far away or on an angle. Angle shots are worthless. I can't tell anything from these..


Denisdo, thanks for the additional picture, but there is no close up of the Hermes name stamping.


GOOD CLEAN SHOTS, NO ANGLE SHOTS, CLOSE UP BUT NOT OVERLY MAGNIFIED.
 
#615
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top