I totally see what you are saying

BB.... but apart from you pic that you've popped up (which I don't know where you got if the drill downs aren't working....

) there is not ONE think I can fault....? Also, do u live in the US...? Cuz how would you know how much it retailed for when she bought it in the US some years ago...?
I really am not trying to be horrible... I'm sorry if i seem pathetic, but I just was hoping to get some other opinions, because I really cannot fault my bag
I understand and I'm not at all offended that you want another opinion.
I'm hopeful someone else will chime in and help you understand that although it might seem to be well-made, it's still a fake, still carries all the horrible implications of the counterfeit trade and isn't what you paid for.
I found a completed listing for style 3565. There's a clear and legible picture of the creed and as you can see, it has the identical serial number as the bag you have.
http://cgi.ebay.com/NWT-358-COACH-P...tem&pt=US_CSA_WH_Handbags&hash=item2307ad57b8
If you read this forum, you'll often see questions asking whether such-and-such a serial number is an authentic bag. And the response given is that a serial number cannot prove authenticity because the counterfeiters can and often do put legitimate serial numbers on fakes. (Your bag is one of those examples.)
In this case, the serial number proves UN-authenticity since the serial number doesn't match the style of bag.
OOps what I meant with this part 'Also, do u live in the US...? Cuz how would you know how much it retailed for when she bought it in the US some years ago...?"
Is that she was paying in Aussie dollars, in the US.... so depending on the time she was there, it may only have been $200ish USD but $400ish AUD...?
I do live in the US. As for knowing how much the bag retailed for, I don't know exactly; I was just commenting that signature bags generally don't retail for over $400.
I'm not even sure that the style of bag your's is trying to copy was even made in 2005, the year on the creed.