Authenticate This COACH - **see first post for format**

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

IMPORTANT READ-ME

Please post authenticity questions related to COACH in this thread. No PMs please.
For further information, please refer to the first post on page 1 of this thread.

Please follow the following requests:
  • Before you submit a request for authentication, please search this thread to make sure that the item has not previously been authenticated by searching the seller ID and/or item number. This is not a thread to ask general questions about COACH, please refer to our main Coach forum for such information.
  • Note that authenticators have the right to refuse any requests. This is a free service, but it is imperative that you help our authenticators by using the following format:
  • FOR ITEMS LISTED ONLINE:
    Item:
    Listing number:
    Seller and site where listed
    Link:
    Comments:

  • FOR ITEMS NOT LISTED ONLINE:
    Item:
    Where purchased or how obtained
    Comments:
BASIC PICTURES REQUIRED (but more may be requested): If necessary pictures are in the listing, it's not necessary to upload and duplicate them.
  • Front of item
  • Back of item
  • Full clear and legible creed text and serial number
  • Made in tags (when available)
  • Measurements
  • For bags with turnlock closures, show pictures of back of female side of turnlock
  • For bags with magnetic snaps, show pictures of the male part of the snap so that the numbers and letters on it can be read
  • If applicable, search interior of bag and/or pockets for small white tag with production information and include a picture of that.
Thank you and be safe!
 
Just a few more pics

It looks good to me but please wait for other opinions/confirmation.

The rogues (and others) are extremely well faked.

I'll take a BeenBurned opinion over mine any day of the week when it comes to recent styles like the Rogue, Swagger, etc. It looks OK to me too. If I were a counterfeiter I wouldn't spend my valuable time faking something with so many expensive and time-consuming details when there are so many styles that are much easier and cheaper to fake. The studs alone would drive me freakin' nuts!

Use it and enjoy. The odds are strongly in your favor that it's the real deal. Pretty color too! :smile:
 

We need to see photos of the entire bag to authenticate, please read post number One in this thread.

Why are you questioning it? If you could explain what you think is wrong with the creed, it would help. I've only looked at a few others but don't see any differences between those others and yours other than a slight change in the wording of the creed in bags made at that # 93 plant toward the end of the year but that change is confirmed by other examples of that style from the same plant and time period, so what are your concerns?

And if you can loosen the lining and pull it out so you can get even lighting on the creed photo, that would help too. Bigger isn't always necessarily better. Other sellers on Ebay have done it with that style so it shouldn't be a problem. We don't need any more creed photos unless the lighting can be improved, and then just one photo will be enough.
 
We need to see photos of the entire bag to authenticate, please read post number One in this thread.

Why are you questioning it? If you could explain what you think is wrong with the creed, it would help. I've only looked at a few others but don't see any differences between those others and yours other than a slight change in the wording of the creed in bags made at that # 93 plant toward the end of the year but that change is confirmed by other examples of that style from the same plant and time period, so what are your concerns?

And if you can loosen the lining and pull it out so you can get even lighting on the creed photo, that would help too. Bigger isn't always necessarily better. Other sellers on Ebay have done it with that style so it shouldn't be a problem. We don't need any more creed photos unless the lighting can be improved, and then just one photo will be enough.
I was concerned that the wording is different. Thank you.
 
I was concerned that the wording is different. Thank you.

Here's another one from the same plant number 93, same month (J for September) and year 2012. Coach changed the creeds in some of the plants during that time to eliminate the country of manufacture. Creeds from that same plant a few months earlier still included the China location.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Coach-Lega...298153?hash=item285432a969:g:5boAAOSwh41apbvI

and here's one from August, a month earlier, that also has the newer creed wording:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/COACH-Hand...841539?hash=item2f17a04203:g:9-0AAOSwRlhaqCti
 
Last edited:
It looks good to me but please wait for other opinions/confirmation.

The rogues (and others) are extremely well faked.

I'll take a BeenBurned opinion over mine any day of the week when it comes to recent styles like the Rogue, Swagger, etc. It looks OK to me too. If I were a counterfeiter I wouldn't spend my valuable time faking something with so many expensive and time-consuming details when there are so many styles that are much easier and cheaper to fake. The studs alone would drive me freakin' nuts!

Use it and enjoy. The odds are strongly in your favor that it's the real deal. Pretty color too! :smile:
Thank you both! I got a fantastic deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeenBurned
Hi! Have recently picked up a few new finds and would love to get your expert opinion on authentication.
Vintage Legacy (?) Bag
L: 10"
H: 9"
D: 4"
IMG_0720.jpg IMG_0721.jpg IMG_0723.jpg

Black Dinky Bag
L: 9.5"
H: 6.5"
D: 2"
IMG_0714.jpg IMG_0715.jpg IMG_0717.jpg

Convertible Top Zip Clutch (Is there another name for this bag?)
L: 11”
H: 7.25”
W: 2.25”

IMG_0710.jpg IMG_0711.jpg IMG_0712.jpg

Thank you so much!
 
Hi! Have recently picked up a few new finds and would love to get your expert opinion on authentication.
Vintage Legacy (?) Bag
L: 10"
H: 9"
D: 4"
View attachment 4003784 View attachment 4003785 View attachment 4003786

Black Dinky Bag
L: 9.5"
H: 6.5"
D: 2"
View attachment 4003805 View attachment 4003806 View attachment 4003807

Convertible Top Zip Clutch (Is there another name for this bag?)
L: 11”
H: 7.25”
W: 2.25”

View attachment 4003813 View attachment 4003814 View attachment 4003815

Thank you so much!
All are authentic.
1. classic pouch #9170, probably from the early 70s.
2. pocket purse #9755, from the late 80s or early 90s. This was never called a Dinky.
3. Zippered clutch #9455 from the mid 70s, later called a basic bag.
 
Top