I have wanted to really like LV fine jewelry, as I've been looking at it off and on for the past 5 years. So far I've seen only one line that appeals to my aesthetic, the star blossom pave pieces. The look is more ubiquitous, which may not what you want when you are wearing designer fine jewelry, but it is with LV because most people, when they see the LV motifs or logo associate it with canvas. I love the LV monogram canvas for what it is, but I don't necessarily associate monogram canvas with fine jewelry.
I've tried on the bangles and I find the finish and the sizing not be up to the standards of VCA or Cartier. The collections of these two houses have matured enough to have sizes that fit even people with small wrists, which is not available from LV. Also, the underside finishing of their bangles is not as clean, nor is the design as thoughtful from a practical perspective. I distinctly remember trying on the empreinte bangle, and the sharp edges and corners of the LV logo poked and scratched my skin, while on. The actual amount of gold used to construct the bracelet felt lighter than Cartier and VCA, and yet it is priced as high, or higher depending on the Cartier or VCA model to which it is being compared. The sharp angles and pokey corners just tell me they are a level or two below Cartier, VCA or Bulgari, which has angles and orders in their design too, but have experienced enough designers to make their pieces comfortable and functional, as well as beautiful. I also tried on the dentelle one row WG and diamonds bracelet, and again from a design standpoint, this bracelet cannot be made to fit all sizes. There is no place to shorten it by mm's. You remove one clover and you lose 1-2 cms? How do you achieve symmetry again given the pattern of the motifs? Function and design issues. And then nevermind resale value... If I buy a piece, it will be for fun. I won't look at it as a piece I can pass down to the next generation, as I do my VCA and Cartier pieces.