TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Congrats! Enjoy! It's such a great bagI got my first 19 in today. It’s a keeper!
View attachment 5294255
Congrats! Enjoy! It's such a great bag![]()
Honestly, I don‘t think it‘s better. If you look at the older ones: the goatskin bags are usually much more wrinkled.Don’t they produce 19s using goatskin anymore? Heard goatskin is better than lamb for 19. Planning to get a 19 this month!
Hmm hmm really! I don’t have 19s so I still don’t know. I was always looking for goatskin but now that you said that, maybe it is okay for me to buy 19 in lamb afterall.Honestly, I don‘t think it‘s better. If you look at the older ones: the goatskin bags are usually much more wrinkled.
Hmm hmm really! I don’t have 19s so I still don’t know. I was always looking for goatskin but now that you said that, maybe it is okay for me to buy 19 in lamb afterall.![]()
ocMomof3 I agree - The ones that look worse on reseller sites could have been stored wrong, over packed with too many things, etc - I have a black lambskin 19 since June but have not worn much as we don’t go out much due to co-vid still going around. My SA sent it to be as he thought it was goatskin, It looks and feels beautiful and when I did wear it I went in and out of the back pocket to get my phone and no scratches at all from my nails. I was one who always said I wanted a goatskin but most were so wrinkled. But I just bought a beige goatskin 20A from Fashionphile it has no winkles at all - very well cared for. My BO3386 # -Is this the same as yours - for goatskin - Just to let others know that Fashionphile is listing Chanel 19’s from 2021 as goatskin (no authenticity card) and showing pictures of the metal chip plate behind the lock which started about April last year so they must be Lambskin.Have this bag in goatskin (as of January 2020) and it looks brand new. I don't think we can make generalizations about how these leathers "age". The way we care for, fill, and store our bags will affect how they look. My SA, a longtime employee of Chanel, told me that she often can't tell just by looking at the 19 if it is goatskin or lambskin. This is meant to be a relaxed-looking bag. Perhaps the goatskin vs lambskin conversation is elevated beyond a reasonable point?
Have this bag in goatskin (as of January 2020) and it looks brand new. I don't think we can make generalizations about how these leathers "age". The way we care for, fill, and store our bags will affect how they look. My SA, a longtime employee of Chanel, told me that she often can't tell just by looking at the 19 if it is goatskin or lambskin. This is meant to be a relaxed-looking bag. Perhaps the goatskin vs lambskin conversation is elevated beyond a reasonable point?
ocMomof3 I agree - The ones that look worse on reseller sites could have been stored wrong, over packed with too many things, etc - I have a black lambskin 19 since June but have not worn much as we don’t go out much due to co-vid still going around. My SA sent it to be as he thought it was goatskin, It looks and feels beautiful and when I did wear it I went in and out of the back pocket to get my phone and no scratches at all from my nails. I was one who always said I wanted a goatskin but most were so wrinkled. But I just bought a beige goatskin 20A from Fashionphile it has no winkles at all - very well cared for. My BO3386 # -Is this the same as yours - for goatskin - Just to let others know that Fashionphile is listing Chanel 19’s from 2021 as goatskin (no authenticity card) and showing pictures of the metal chip plate behind the lock which started about April last year so they must be Lambskin.
By the way, these photos show the difference between the 2 leathers clearly, the goatskin is usually more wrinklySome comparisons:
21K on the left, beige clair in the middle and 20B on the right.
Interestingly, the 21K is the exact same color code of the 20A beige. 21K is lambskin while 20A is goatskin. 20B is goatskin as well.
View attachment 5295860
21K on left, 20B on right.
View attachment 5295863