Hi all, i am in Japan ATM and came across these two beauties.
One is a Kelly 35 and the other is a Hac 32. I think the Hac is in Epsom leather I'm not too sure about the Kelly.
They are both the same price very similar conditionView attachment 3313539View attachment 3313540View attachment 3313541View attachment 3313542View attachment 3313543View attachment 3313544
SHOULD I?
If yes WHICH ONE should I take home ?
Thanks all.
In my eyes both look gorgeus and seem to be in an excellent condition. Voting for a Birkin for me I'd recommend the Kelly for you - it looks better on you.
Hi all, i am in Japan ATM and came across these two beauties.
One is a Kelly 35 and the other is a Hac 32. I think the Hac is in Epsom leather I'm not too sure about the Kelly.
They are both the same price very similar condition
SHOULD I?
If yes WHICH ONE should I take home ?
Thanks all.
I kind of feel like the Kelly is a tad big for me but then with the Hac, I feel like "might as well get a birkin that holds value" if that make sense ?
I think the Kelly is big on you. I have a HAC and love it, it is a great shape, holds a ton and most people cannot tell the difference anyway but what matters is that you love it. There are tons of bags out there in both styles so why not keep shopping if you're unsure.
I think the Kelly is a little big for you.
I kind of feel like the Kelly is a tad big for me but then with the Hac, I feel like "might as well get a birkin that holds value" if that make sense ?
as far as I know is the HAC the original version of the Birkin, but taller. But perhaps one of the Hermès experts could jump in?
Yes ! You are correct and I fully agree. I would take none and keep looking.I kind of feel like the Kelly is a tad big for me but then with the Hac, I feel like "might as well get a birkin that holds value" if that make sense ?