correct. And this is even worse.
Here is my opinion about the pictures. I'm already long enough in the BDSM scene to be able to read the visual language of the pictures - what I already wrote on the subject " dog whistle in pictures".
The problem is not only the teddy, which is already disturbing enough, but in the structure of the image.
The picture on the bed shows a setup of a bed as it is defined as "appealing" in the BDSM context - everything is lying straight next to each other, a leash is ready (nobody has seen it, right

? well, leashes take place in BDSM

), the items are lined up neatly and straight. The mat reminds of a pad, the towels also remind of a BDSM session. That alone is enough to make a reference to BDSM. It gets really scary when you look at the posture of the children. In the BDSM field there are different currents, one enjoys great popularity among particularly "delightful contemporaries" (which I reject by the way, but is another topic) and one of the poses is definitely a slave posture. Yes, the word is nasty, but in the BDSM context many people carry this title with pride, so no discussion here about this topic please, because BDSM is primarily consensual and categorically rejects any contact with children and also with uninvolved third parties.
So when I say that the picture has a clear reference to BDSM, then you can assume that people like me can "read" these pictures very well. And this is such frightening, disgusting, outrageous, unbearable and indiscussable that I really can't say anything more about it except: GO TO ****ING HELL!
That said, I am happy to report that the IG account of B. (won't write that name anymore) is: empty. Let's keep it that way. (and you can't comment on the Kering account, which is sad bc I wanted to let them know how I feel about them).
View attachment 5660580