What do y'all think about the Balenciaga SS23 & Adidas collab "teddy" controversy?

What's your take in the Balenciaga teddy bear controversay?

  • It's harmless

    Votes: 23 3.2%
  • It's disgusting

    Votes: 554 76.7%
  • It's just to garner attention - Balenciaga being Balenciaga

    Votes: 94 13.0%
  • I don't know what to think

    Votes: 46 6.4%
  • What controversay? (links in post)

    Votes: 5 0.7%

  • Total voters
    722

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Bears repeating!
We'd like to leave this thread open, but political conspiracy theories, among other comments need to stop. Discuss the topic only please, let's keep the discussion open and all responses to others need to remain respectful.


Also, let’s stick closely to topic, it really helps preventing tangents and drama.
 
Last edited:
Crisis management starts with communication. If the apology and words about it thus far have failed for some of you, what apology wouldn't have failed? Language to the effect of taking responsibility, mentioning the problems, and stating steps to fix it going forward apparently isn't enough: you got better words? What might they be? Care to offer a draft? (Spoiler: there are no apologies some here will offer as acceptable. We know this.)

Again, this is the stage of public contrition. Not the actions succeeding it.
I'm not going to do the heavy lifting for them. What's been stated by them thus far, is woefully inadequate. Since the word contrition has been used, here is the definition sourced from dictionary.com.--- meaning sincere penitence or remorse - Nothing stated thus far conveys that sentiment.
 
I've been ambivalent about whether I should comment as this is a sensitive for many of our members, myself included. Once I reply, for my peace of mind, I will not be responding.

Balenciaga deserves every morsel of vitriol they're receiving. Every element within the photo shoot was carefully selected to craft an image, one that places children at its focal point. It is one thing to take controversial pictures and dissect painful topics but it's another to willingly insert Supreme Court documents into the background and posing children on a bed. Children cannot legally consent to how their likeness is portrayed. It is abhorrent that the adults saw nothing wrong with this. In any type of media, framing is everything. The way these CHILDREN are being framed is gross. It is for the sake of shock value - there is NO art in this kind of SHOCK VALUE.
 
I own Bal, Gucci and YSL and I happen to really like Gucci. Even if I stay away from Bal bags in the future I'm sure that money from the other brands would go towards helping Bal if they happen to falter in sales as a result of this botched campaign. I imagine that supporting the other brands indirectly still supports Bal so I won't be purchasing from Kering group again.
Right. They need to balance the portfolio and keep the companies in shape and afloat. I am out. No more bags from Kering brands for me. The company doesn't align with my values. And in the future, I need to do my own homework by researching companies and not just fall for design. But this is me. I am not preaching to anyone. People do whatever they want with their money. :heart:
 
So you think they could announce specific, confidential staff firing decisions in a mea culpa PR memo, without following due process...
I don't care about their due process and where did I say they should announce who gets fired?
They could at least show that they are taking this very seriously, but all they are taking seriously right now is "How can we get out of this and make it look like it was an accident".
What did Demna say something like "I hope to learn from this" etc. Really?? He knew exactly what he was doing, it's all there perfectly laid out. Nobody could accidentally include that much symbolism of the same thing.
 
I've been ambivalent about whether I should comment as this is a sensitive for many of our members, myself included. Once I reply, for my peace of mind, I will not be responding.

Balenciaga deserves every morsel of vitriol they're receiving. Every element within the photo shoot was carefully selected to craft an image, one that places children at its focal point. It is one thing to take controversial pictures and dissect painful topics but it's another to willingly insert Supreme Court documents into the background and posing children on a bed. Children cannot legally consent to how their likeness is portrayed. It is abhorrent that the adults saw nothing wrong with this. In any type of media, framing is everything. The way these CHILDREN are being framed is gross. It is for the sake of shock value - there is NO art in this kind of SHOCK VALUE.
I was talking about this with a friend who is a Detective in IL. He showed me a dozen different examples of items that were in the photos and told me what they meant, before I said "ok enough". He said they weren't trying to hide it. They were advertising it. And the way one of the girls was standing on the bed... Wtf.
 
I don't care about their due process and where did I say they should announce who gets fired?
You don't care, a position that costs you nothing, personally, to hold, without any stake in the outcome. But companies and big orgs do and must care about HR process, because that's potentially disastrous and expensive to mess up. They're already in the midst of a disaster.

Answering your question, in post 450 You wrote: "Maybe "We fu*ked up, (a WHOLE BUNCH OF US) and will cut ties with anyone who approved these entirely inappropriate photos to be used in our stupid gift shop promotion"-- which had to be in house, and probably easily outed, hence totally not what they'd do in a PR apology.
 
Last edited:
You don't and that's cheap to have a feeling. But companies do and must care about HR process, because that's potentially very expensive otherwise.

Answering your question, in post 450 You wrote: "Maybe "We fu*ked up, (a WHOLE BUNCH OF US) and will cut ties with anyone who approved these entirely inappropriate photos to be used in our stupid gift shop promotion"-- which had to be in house, hence announcing firings just as chatter for the public. Not going to happen.
I know it won't happen. But you asked what apology would satisfy people, and that's the apology I want to hear. They do not seem to be upset, shocked, outraged about this do they? I hear a few people saying this will blow over and I hear many, many more say they will never forget. People are upset. It took too long to post a very carefully worded apology that sounds like damage control. It doesn't feel sincere to me.
ETA to address your first point-I am not worried about the adults who thought this was OK. They are adults they can defend their position but children cannot. Children are not to be the prize for sick people. I will worry about the kids and if I have an extra minute maybe I will worry about the adults. I am not trying to be disrespectful to you, but this is how I feel.
 
Last edited:
I truly feel Balenciaga is finished at this point. There is no turning back after what they have done and they should just throw the whole company in the trash and each and everyone who did not say NO to this campaign should go to therapy and court.

I’m sorry but the line that has been crossed here is just unbelievably disturbing and makes me want to throw up.
 
I truly feel Balenciaga is finished at this point. There is no turning back after what they have done and they should just throw the whole company in the trash and each and everyone who did not say NO to this campaign should go to therapy and court.

I’m sorry but the line that has been crossed here is just unbelievably disturbing and makes me want to throw up.
They are probably counting that people will move on and forget. And I do wish, with all my heart that no one WILL EVER forget and now allow them to continue with their desensitizing agenda and that they will pay the price for what they have done
 
I don’t know much about Balenciaga and their history, but saw a behind the scenes clip of a fashion show model holding baby doll in a front carrier (supposedly with a bruise on her though I couldn’t see it) also holding a Balenciaga Paris bag with a pacifier, bloody clothes and a bloody teddy bear inside. Is this type of thing common in Balenciaga fashion shows?



Also, it makes sense teddy bears represent childhood innocence and they are doing to the bears what they can’t actually do to children.

496E1234-1885-4555-98F5-932F9C6B5E24.jpeg

3C5A80AA-2F08-4355-BA64-DE860E63DF21.jpeg

0F0CE882-4A1E-4BDB-8250-82E6D25A1BCA.jpeg
 
I don’t know much about Balenciaga and their history, but saw a behind the scenes clip of a fashion show model holding baby doll in a front carrier (supposedly with a bruise on her though I couldn’t see it) also holding a Balenciaga Paris bag with a pacifier, bloody clothes and a bloody teddy bear inside. Is this type of thing common in Balenciaga fashion shows?



Also, it makes sense teddy bears represent childhood innocence and they are doing to the bears what they can’t actually do to children.

View attachment 5663761

View attachment 5663762

View attachment 5663763
This is what we have been talking about ALL WEEK. It's not one isolated incident. It's not one ad. One campaign. One photoshoot. One court document. Once we start putting all the pieces of the puzzle together, we see a theme. And the themes are children, sexualization of children, violence, and children covered in blood. How on earth can anyone with a sane mind deny this? How can anyone with a moral compass not acknowledge this? Sickening and disgusting!!!! Thank you for sharing
 
For the sake of not shocking the audience I will only post this picture that people are saying belongs to Fracois Pinault (the CEO of Kering) auction's house website. Pictures are all over the web.



Auction house.jpg
 
I was talking about this with a friend who is a Detective in IL. He showed me a dozen different examples of items that were in the photos and told me what they meant, before I said "ok enough". He said they weren't trying to hide it. They were advertising it. And the way one of the girls was standing on the bed... Wtf.
Do you mind sharing the items and the relevance? I think it would be informative so that more people are aware of what to look for. I know it’s a nauseating subject but I’d hate to see something else in plain sight and not know what it really was.
 
Top