Hi
Sorry maybe I’ve got it wrong , but I thought that before they ship out your items that they went through a authentication process?
I understood that the seller shipped to vc head quarters where they check them,
The problem I met was there were a few things that were wrong so I really can’t for the life of me understand how these passed,
I know buying preloved is a risk I just thought that any thing that wasn’t authentic would not get through,
Thanks x
Absolutely you’re right, they are supposed to be authenticated, it’s the service they offer, and it is very poor if a fake gets through, and completely unacceptable if despite a verifiable fake being brought to their attention they then fail to make reparation.
I was only saying that I don’t think the authentication process can ever be perfect, and that I don’t believe VC is intentionally dishonest. VC is a pretty useful platform and mostly works well. I’ve had really good purchases as well as having made sales. It’s not right that they should get it wrong, and when they do get it wrong, they must put it right because they have failed to do what they say they will: there’s a contract.
In my experience with them they have actually always tried to protect me against rogue sellers, and have also acted to protect buyers when I have unintentionally missed a small flaw in something I’ve sold.
It’s quite often implied by reviewers and posters that VC is something approaching a scam (I am not by any means suggesting that you are doing this), and I only mean to say that I do not believe this particular thing to be the case: in my experience both buying and selling they have actually always endeavoured to do the right the right thing. I don’t think people generally post about their good experiences, so we are less aware of them. Some sellers are poor, lazy, slow, some sellers are outright scammers — I’ve noticed when VC ensures some of these latter are taken off the platform.
I’ve had my heart in my mouth when buying a really expensive pre-owned item because I can never truly believe, whatever anybody says or offers, that authentication is guaranteed, and I will always believe I’m choosing to take a risk. The backstop should then be that even if VC makes a mistake (and I do believe it would be a mistake, lack of thoroughness, or incompetence, as it may be with your shoes, not deliberate) they should rectify the situation if challenged with fair evidence. It seems, from reading other posts on TPF, that even the most respected independent authenticators may make mistakes at times and even manufacturers don’t seem to be always clear on the authenticity of items supposedly made by themselves. I think there are different levels of competence at VC depending on which particular quality control person inspects the purchase, and I think some things get rushed through on busy days without enough attention. This is undeniably wrong and should not happen, but realistically it does sometimes I am sure; however my experience would lead me to believe that VC will respond and put matters right in that eventuality if queried. Other people may well think differently.
I’d be surprised and sorry to hear it if in the end they insist an obvious fake is authentic even after it’s re-inspected, and if they do you should definitely get independent authentication and challenge them on it, because they have failed to do what they offered. That’s a crazy amount of hassle, obviously, and you really shouldn’t have to do it.
I really hope there is a satisfactory outcome for you. [emoji846]That sinking feeling when you think you might have spent a lot of money on a fake is horrible.