Van Cleef in action!

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Wow @chiaoapple I actually love it layered like this! I'd likely wear it shorter as well because I'm sure my yorkies would assume it was something they could play with when worn long :lol: but the times I did wear it long, I think it paired with something shorter looks great and fills that empty space you were referring to.

@BigAkoya I know you are not keen on shorter necklaces but would you consider pairing the very large frivole worn long with , for ex: another pendant which is worn, say at 20/22"? That length shouldn't be in direct line with most round necklines or are you just not a fan of anything in that length vicinity at all? By double pairing, you would fill in a bit of the void that the pendant (with just a chain traveling for most of the length of the design) leaves as it travels past the chest/rib area (the 20 is a continuous design so its more interesting as it travels its whole length). For ex: a 15 motif, if it existed without an extender or bracelet attachment (re: clasps), would probably be ideal. If you do end up liking the cosmos btf ring, it does also come in a medium clip. The only thing with that idea is then your mixing frivole and cosmos:huh: hmmm, now that Im thinking of it, I don't know if the two flora collections would work well together. It might be too much of a mash up. I assume you also don't love the onyx and wg pave 20 motif? Gah! I see your dilemma!
You hit this on the nail! The void when the eye has to roam. That dead empty space that is the issue often when a long necklace is worn with a pendant/charm. Yes, that is my dilemma with long chains with a pendant at the bottom. For me, the pendant needs to be huge, otherwise, the eye has to roam too much.

I love your suggestion of adding a chain, but I think the problem is the Frivole flower is too small for it to be at the "base" of necklace stack. Your great suggestion has me thinking now! I love Tiffany bottle pendants, and one of them I own is the small bottle with the turquoise stopper. It's on a long chain, 28", however the bottle itself is small and does not pop much worn by itself. I solved that problem by wearing the bottle shorter, layered with a longer chain, so it looks like the chain frames the pendant. Shorter pendant, longer chain. I hope that makes sense.

Your suggestion gave me the idea I could maybe do the same with the Frivole flower, wear it shorter as you suggested, probably buy a 26"-28” chain from VCA, but then wear a longer necklace 34"-36" to frame it. Oooh oooh oooh... I am going to look at this option! Now... what would be longer necklace. :biggrin:

I totally love the Very Large Flower Pave pendant. If I wore short necklaces, I would wear it super short, 15", so it hangs right at the bottom of the hollow of my neck. I would channel the groovy flower child look! This piece is one of my favorite pieces (actually, VCA can make a humogous size and I would love it even more). I was so bummed it did not look, as you said.... the void! I love that description, great use of words!

Yes, I agree with you, Cosmos and Frivole don't quite work together. I did try on the 20 oynx pave, and I didn't like it. It was not bold enough to look like a bold, harsh 20 motif all oynx which is the look I want. Yet it was not "diamond-y" enough to come across as a long diamond necklace, so for me, that necklace was neither here nor there. I think I posted a photo of me trying it on somewhere. It was just ok on me... didn't really pop, the little pave motifs took a backseat to the strong black oynx, so visually, it looked like empty spaces on what should be a beautiful all oynx 20 motif. Gah... I just realize I go so overboard describing the way jewelry looks. :shocked: I just hope you’re not bored with these long posts. My opinion of course, and everyone has their own preferences. I hope it might help others as they are deciding on what pieces they want.

Thank you again for this idea! I am so glad you get this dilemma. You are awesome! :drinks:

Oh.... I found a photo of what I am talking about.... pretend the bottle pendant is the Frivole flower. The bottle in real life is acutally still bigger than the Frivole flower, even though it's the small size bottle. So imagine... replace the bottle with the Frivole pave flower, then add a chain. But not just a boring metal chain, it needs to be an interesting necklace to complement the flower. Such drama... all for a flower! I'm going to give it one more shot on this, and quit. I'm probably trying too hard to force it. :biggrin:

52FF91C2-4C90-47AB-A7C4-6A018A85EE69.png
 
You hit this on the nail! The void when the eye has to roam. That dead empty space that is the issue often when a long necklace is worn with a pendant/charm. Yes, that is my dilemma with long chains with a pendant at the bottom. For me, the pendant needs to be huge, otherwise, the eye has to roam too much.

I love your suggestion of adding a chain, but I think the problem is the Frivole flower is too small for it to be at the "base" of necklace stack. Your great suggestion has me thinking now! I love Tiffany bottle pendants, and one of them I own is the small bottle with the turquoise stopper. It's on a long chain, 28", however the bottle itself is small and does not pop much worn by itself. I solved that problem by wearing the bottle shorter, layered with a longer chain, so it looks like the chain frames the pendant. Shorter pendant, longer chain. I hope that makes sense.

Your suggestion gave me the idea I could maybe do the same with the Frivole flower, wear it shorter as you suggested, probably buy a 26"-28” chain from VCA, but then wear a longer necklace 34"-36" to frame it. Oooh oooh oooh... I am going to look at this option! Now... what would be longer necklace. :biggrin:

I totally love the Very Large Flower Pave pendant. If I wore short necklaces, I would wear it super short, 15", so it hangs right at the bottom of the hollow of my neck. I would channel the groovy flower child look! This piece is one of my favorite pieces (actually, VCA can make a humogous size and I would love it even more). I was so bummed it did not look, as you said.... the void! I love that description, great use of words!

Yes, I agree with you, Cosmos and Frivole don't quite work together. I did try on the 20 oynx pave, and I didn't like it. It was not bold enough to look like a bold, harsh 20 motif all oynx which is the look I want. Yet it was not "diamond-y" enough to come across as a long diamond necklace, so for me, that necklace was neither here nor there. I think I posted a photo of me trying it on somewhere. It was just ok on me... didn't really pop, the little pave motifs took a backseat to the strong black oynx, so visually, it looked like empty spaces on what should be a beautiful all oynx 20 motif. Gah... I just realize I go so overboard describing the way jewelry looks. :shocked: I just hope you’re not bored with these long posts. My opinion of course, and everyone has their own preferences. I hope it might help others as they are deciding on what pieces they want.

Thank you again for this idea! I am so glad you get this dilemma. You are awesome! :drinks:

Oh.... I found a photo of what I am talking about.... pretend the bottle pendant is the Frivole flower. The bottle in real life is acutally still bigger than the Frivole flower, even though it's the small size bottle. So imagine... replace the bottle with the Frivole pave flower, then add a chain. But not just a boring metal chain, it needs to be an interesting necklace to complement the flower. Such drama... all for a flower! I'm going to give it one more shot on this, and quit. I'm probably trying too hard to force it. :biggrin:

View attachment 5152908
Yes this exactly! I can completely envision what you mean. I think it is worth a shot. Its a stunning piece and would be a beautiful addition to bring home. I agree, however, that you shouldn't have to "force" a piece to work. It should be able to fit into your wardrobe relatively easily. Here is to hoping it works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigAkoya
I see! The pave looks amazing. Here is a mod shot of the necklace at full length (I am an inch shorter than you). I had to add a 10 motif as I couldn’t bear a bare neck haha. Please excuse the at home lounge wear.
The set you are planning sounds super gorgeous.

I love this look! Some of the outfit-jewelry pairings here are very visually busy and the eye darts around and gets tired. I know you said it's home loungewear, but this looks so effortless; makes it much easier to admire the silhouette and the pretty adornments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chiaoapple
I wear long necklaces all the time, and I have long lengths (long considered to be 30" or more) varying from 34" to 52".

The secret to wearing long necklaces is to pretend you're wearing a tie. When you bend over deep, just cross your arm over it, like a guy does when he is wearing his tie. My work environment is male dominated, and after observing that, I thought... a ha! That's the secret sauce for women wearing long necklaces, a "female" tie!

On length, any where from 30" - 40" I love. Works great, not annoying.
For me, the 52" though is more annoying, so if you are thinking of getting something long like the 16 motif, I will say, if you are not used to long necklaces or if you like to baby your stuff, it's probably not a good choice.

I have a 52" strand of pearls, and I have knocked them around the most. I once closed the door on my dishwasher, and half the strand was inside. It was too funny. I couldn't move my head up because the pearls were like a short rope attached to me. :biggrin: Of course I opened the dishwasher door to free myself, and everything was fine. From that experience though, when I empty out the dishwasher, I take the 52" off and then put them back on after I finish emptying the dishwasher. My other lengths I keep on all the time. No worries at all, oh... except one time I was blowing out a birthday cake, forgot about the "tie" method, bent over deep (table was super short), and my necklace ended up in the cake. That was hilarous too, but it's life, and it's fun memories of jewelry well lived.

Just pretend like you're wearing a tie and all will be perfect!
The chic Roaring 20s swinging look that one gets from wearing long necklaces far outweighs any inconvenience.
I hope that hope that helps.
Thank you! This advice is brilliant! Hugs
 
Hello again ladies! I had the flower lace pendant and now I've got the earrings!! :heart:. Now I am thinking about the ring, but I would prefer the lotus ring which I don't think would pair with these pieces. I have to think about it, and there is also the flower lace brooch which is a beauty. Well, stop, Lucy and take it easy! :biggrin:

IMG20210803005114_BURST000_COVER.jpg
 
Last edited:
Hello again ladies! I had the flower lace pendant and now I've got the earrings!! :heart:. Now I am thinking about the ring, but I would prefer the lotus ring which I don't think would pair with these pieces. I have to think about it, and there is also the flower lace brooch which is a beauty. Well, stop, Lucy and take it easy! :biggrin:

View attachment 5154048
Get the matching ring! It would be so gorgeous! And I agree, Lotus does not match it at all. Flowerlace has asymmetrical rounded petals, and Lotus has symmetrical pointy petals. A complete mismatch.

I think you are destined to get the matching ring. :biggrin:
Beautiful set!
 
  • Like
Reactions: LucyMadrid and Lien
Hello again ladies! I had the flower lace pendant and now I've got the earrings!! :heart:. Now I am thinking about the ring, but I would prefer the lotus ring which I don't think would pair with these pieces. I have to think about it, and there is also the flower lace brooch which is a beauty. Well, stop, Lucy and take it easy! :biggrin:

View attachment 5154048

Be still my heart!

These are what a princess in a fairytale would wear.

Mod shots pleeeeese!
 
Get the matching ring! It would be so gorgeous! And I agree, Lotus does not match it at all. Flowerlace has asymmetrical rounded petals, and Lotus has symmetrical pointy petals. A complete mismatch.

I think you are destined to get the matching ring. :biggrin:
Beautiful set!

Hallo BigAkoya and thank you for your comments. You see, I have a diamond ring which can match with this set and I've seen the brooch, awesome, with double petals! (I've seen a pic of this brooch on a plain black sweater and the effect is really stunning) I mean, if I buy the brooch I can have two different sets, earrings-pendant-diamond ring, and earrings-brooch-diamond ring, (on the other hand, I'm dying for the lotus ring which is a different purchase and also a big ticket piece), so, I must think about it quietly and decide what suits me better. Thanks again for your help! :drinks:
 
Top