Treatment in Hermes Stores

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I've never had any problem shopping at H...
When my debit card declined in the shop due to fraud prevention and I was on the phone to my bank for 30 min my SA waited for me patiently while in the mean time we tried with my overseas card and the transaction went through without problem.
So far I have had nothing but fantastic service at H boutiques in both Singapore and Harrods
 
Has anyone had bad experience with Hermes shops?

I was made feel humiliated and embarrassed by the cashier at Sloan square branch in London UK. She insulted, humiliated, embarrassed and bullied me. She was clearily discriminating against me and probably being racist.

She said due to 'fraud reason' she won't do transaction because I was using husband's card. That was a slap.on the face when I have been shopping there for a while and was carrying the Birkin bag I bought from that shop just a couple of weeks ago. And the fact that she implied I could be a fraud was shocking to me. She might have had bad experiences before, but it was wrong to profile customers and discriminate (maybe she was racist as well?) I felt completely insulted and embarrassed.

When she was aware that I don't have other ways to pay - I left my debit card at home and my credit card happen to be maxed out. She went, 'maybe your husband could transfer some money to you.' I have never been in a situation when I was not able to pay or afford an item, and I happen to forgot my wallet that's why using husband's credit car and he was in the car with my baby outside. she was disrespectful to me and belittling me. By this point I was being very apologetic, and feeling completely humiliated.

She then suggested to send me an online link to pay - which the shops do for customer not present transactions during lock down period. When I agreed and went along with her suggestion, she bullied me further and said, 'you need to use your own card though'. I could NOT believe she felt the need to twist the dagger she stab in me to inflict more pain.

When I accepted that too and just want it over with (I mean of course I can afford it, why else would I be shopping here with my Birkin), she then shouted across the floor to get attention of SA who helped me. I tried to contain the situation as there are a few SAs and customers on the floor and I was already devastated.

She complained to me 'the SA should have given me the details but you see she didn't'. She made me write down all of my personal details on a piece of paper. It seemed she might have problem with the SA, maybe she expect the SA to stand next to her when she does a transaction, but it is unprofessional to display that negativity in front of customer. She was also in breach of GDPR personal data protection.

She then asked me to come back to the store to pick up the item after online payment. By that point I couldn't help rolling my eyes. I told her to send the item to me. But I had to tell her more than once as she was being passive agreeing saying 'you are welcome to pick it up anytime that is convenient to you '. That was pretty much the nicest thing she said to me, dispite I made my preference dead clear to her already and had to reiterate - post to me.

Due to her unprofessionalism actions, I felt the need to ask her to distory the personal detail I left to her after she finished using it to process online link, as my right under personal data protection . But every time I tried to speak, she talked over me. I had to say, 'can I please finish', for her to stop her loudly talking over me.

I have raised a formal complain to Hermes. I respect their payment policy but I am against how badly I was treated, it was about what the cashier said to me and how she said them. I am suspending any shopping with Hermes at the mean time.
I’m very sorry you had an experience that made you feel this way, though I personally am not sure that I would consider it an insult or bullying. If they are required by the store not to allow credit cards with a different name, that is not the SA’s fault, nor (I would hope) in any way related to her opinion of whether or not you can afford something. It sounds like she worked with you to find an alternative, though maybe not as discretely as you would have liked, rather than flat-out refusing. She would have kept the items for you until you paid. I don’t think it is bullying to clarify that you would still need to use your own card to pay online. Maybe I’m missing something, but to me, the experience sounded reasonable.
 
Last edited:
I’m very sorry you had an experience that made you feel this way, though I personally am not sure that I would consider it an insult or bullying. If they are required by the store not to allow credit cards with a different name, that is not the SA’s fault, nor (I would hope) in any way related to her opinion of whether or not you can afford something. It sounds like she worked with you to find an alternative, though maybe not as discretely as you would have liked, rather than flat-out refusing. She even offered to have you just come back and pick it up later. I don’t think it is bullying to clarify that you would still need to use your own card to pay online. Maybe I’m missing something, but to me, the experience sounded reasonable.

I respect any sotre policy. But the card was charged a second ago for an item by an SA, and for the cashier (different person to SA) to turn around and reject the same card was an inconsistent treatment.
I am against how she treated me rather than the policy.
She wanted me to go home, pay for the item and then came another time to pick up the item, which was inconvenient to me, and after I already expressed wish for item to be posted to me after.
I have paid with both credit card under my name or husband's name before with Hermes online - we have join account. It was wrong of her to insist on how I pay in this instance.
 
I respect any sotre policy. But the card was charged a second ago for an item by an SA, and for the cashier (different person to SA) to turn around and reject the same card was an inconsistent treatment.
I am against how she treated me rather than the policy.
She wanted me to go home, pay for the item and then came another time to pick up the item, which was inconvenient to me, and after I already expressed wish for item to be posted to me after.
I have paid with both credit card under my name or husband's name before with Hermes online - we have join account. It was wrong of her to insist on how I pay in this instance.
Technically their policy is that the profile holder must be there and pay personally with a credit card in their own name. Sounds like the first SA went against policy and allowed you to purchase with your husband’s card whilst the second one stuck to policy. I‘m not sure if the first SA knows you better and thus felt comfortable with allowing you to use your husband‘s CC but I do believe the SAs will get in trouble if they allow it and then if the transaction is challenged by the real card holder. It’s not uncommon for some SAs to be more lenient on this while others more stringent, especially for clients they haven’t worked with before, but technically the first SA was in the wrong to let you do it in the first place. Most customers would have been forced to walk out of the store with zero successful transactions if the only method of payment available was someone else’s credit card. :(
 
I respect any sotre policy. But the card was charged a second ago for an item by an SA, and for the cashier (different person to SA) to turn around and reject the same card was an inconsistent treatment.
I am against how she treated me rather than the policy.
She wanted me to go home, pay for the item and then came another time to pick up the item, which was inconvenient to me, and after I already expressed wish for item to be posted to me after.
I have paid with both credit card under my name or husband's name before with Hermes online - we have join account. It was wrong of her to insist on how I pay in this instance.

Likely, the SA did not notice that the name on the card was not yours. I do know that it is H policy that the name on the card must match and SA's do get in trouble if caught ringing with an unmatched card. I am sorry the experience was disheartening and took away from the joy of shopping, but they have protocol to follow and technically the card used was not yours. I am sure there have been times where irate spouses have fought the charges an unauthorized spouse placed on their card. not saying you are doing that, but legally, the card holder in the case was someone else....
 
The cashier I
Likely, the SA did not notice that the name on the card was not yours. I do know that it is H policy that the name on the card must match and SA's do get in trouble if caught ringing with an unmatched card. I am sorry the experience was disheartening and took away from the joy of shopping, but they have protocol to follow and technically the card used was not yours. I am sure there have been times where irate spouses have fought the charges an unauthorized spouse placed on their card. not saying you are doing that, but legally, the card holder in the case was someone else....

Again, I am happy to comply with their policy. The cashier treated me badly which made me want to just leave the store. If she explained the store policy is for the card owner to authorise or be present for a transaction, it would have been resolved easily as he was just outside in the car.
I was in shock so I didn't think of that, and just agreed to whatever she suggested. But everything she said and the tone she used was discriminating - she already assumed there was a fraud situation.
I just didn't expect such to happen, and has been in shock. For crying out loud, I have purchase history with the store especially being over the moon to be able to buy a Birkin two weeks ago from this store, I don't understand her negative character framing, how she treated me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winiebean
The cashier I

Again, I am happy to comply with their policy. The cashier treated me badly which made me want to just leave the store. If she explained the store policy is for the card owner to authorise or be present for a transaction, it would have been resolved easily as he was just outside in the car.
I was in shock so I didn't think of that, and just agreed to whatever she suggested. But everything she said and the tone she used was discriminating - she already assumed there was a fraud situation.
I just didn't expect such to happen, and has been in shock. For crying out loud, I have purchase history with the store especially being over the moon to be able to buy a Birkin two weeks ago from this store, I don't understand her negative character framing, how she treated me.
I don’t think she was assuming there was fraud or framing you negatively, she was explaining the reason she could not use that card — it is because of fraud reasons. That is not unique to you, it is the reason they have the policy for everyone, and it’s unrelated to purchase history. I don’t think she could have known that your husband was just outside.
 
I don’t think she was assuming there was fraud or framing you negatively, she was explaining the reason she could not use that card — it is because of fraud reasons. That is not unique to you, it is the reason they have the policy for everyone, and it’s unrelated to purchase history. I don’t think she could have known that your husband was just outside.
100% agree with this.
 
Likely, the SA did not notice that the name on the card was not yours. I do know that it is H policy that the name on the card must match and SA's do get in trouble if caught ringing with an unmatched card. I am sorry the experience was disheartening and took away from the joy of shopping, but they have protocol to follow and technically the card used was not yours. I am sure there have been times where irate spouses have fought the charges an unauthorized spouse placed on their card. not saying you are doing that, but legally, the card holder in the case was someone else....
Really?

I’m baffled. I never pay attention to what card I use - whichever I want the points on - and I have probably charged several hundred thousand dollars at H over the last 20 years on cards with someone else’s name on them.
It’s never even been brought up. I know for sure I spent $20,000 on a card in my husband’s name very recently.
 
. She was clearily discriminating against me and probably being racist.

it was wrong to profile customers and discriminate (maybe she was racist as well?)

Racist? That's the takeaway here? Not that you didn't have your wallet, you didn't have your own credit card, and the store noticed this? You think "profiling" is Hermes requiring a legitimate means of payment at checkout?

There are a lot of feelings you felt, but the facts of the situation don't support a "Naughty Hermes!" narrative. Many of us have been there with a fraud protection glitch, and at most it's inconvenient.
 
The cashier I

Again, I am happy to comply with their policy. The cashier treated me badly which made me want to just leave the store. If she explained the store policy is for the card owner to authorise or be present for a transaction, it would have been resolved easily as he was just outside in the car.
I was in shock so I didn't think of that, and just agreed to whatever she suggested. But everything she said and the tone she used was discriminating - she already assumed there was a fraud situation.
I just didn't expect such to happen, and has been in shock. For crying out loud, I have purchase history with the store especially being over the moon to be able to buy a Birkin two weeks ago from this store, I don't understand her negative character framing, how she treated me.

Why didn’t you just have husband come in the store in order to use that card? what ended up happening?
 
Has anyone had bad experience with Hermes shops?

I was made feel humiliated and embarrassed by the cashier at Sloan square branch in London UK. She insulted, humiliated, embarrassed and bullied me. She was clearily discriminating against me and probably being racist.

The SA helped me a put an online transaction through a credit card which had my husband's name on. I payed with a card machine and used PIN. She left me with the cashier to process purchase of a pair of Paris loafer of 830 pounds.
The cashier rejected this same credit card moments later and said due to 'fraud reason' she won't do transaction because I was using husband's card. That was a slap.on the face when I have been shopping there for a while and was carrying the Birkin bag I bought from that shop just a couple of weeks ago. And the fact that she implied I could be a fraud was shocking to me. She might have had bad experiences before, but it was wrong to profile customers and discriminate (maybe she was racist as well?) I felt completely insulted and embarrassed.

When she was aware that I don't have other ways to pay - I left my debit card at home and my credit card happen to be maxed out. She went, 'maybe your husband could transfer some money to you.' I have never been in a situation when I was not able to pay or afford an item, and I happen to forgot my wallet that's why using husband's credit car and he was in the car with my baby outside. she was disrespectful to me and belittling me. By this point I was being very apologetic, and feeling completely humiliated.

She then suggested to send me an online link to pay - which the shops do for customer not present transactions during lock down period. When I agreed and went along with her suggestion, she bullied me further and said, 'you need to use your own card though'. I could NOT believe she felt the need to twist the dagger she stab in me to inflict more pain.

When I accepted that too and just want it over with (I mean of course I can afford it, why else would I be shopping here with my Birkin), she then shouted across the floor to get attention of SA who helped me. I tried to contain the situation as there are a few SAs and customers on the floor and I was already devastated.

She complained to me 'the SA should have given me the details but you see she didn't'. She made me write down all of my personal details on a piece of paper. It seemed she might have problem with the SA, maybe she expect the SA to stand next to her when she does a transaction, but it is unprofessional to display that negativity in front of customer. She was also in breach of GDPR personal data protection.

She then asked me to come back to the store to pick up the item after online payment (as I told her I will pay in the evening ). By that point I couldn't help rolling my eyes. I told her to send the item to me. But I had to tell her more than once as she was being passive agreeing saying 'you are welcome to pick it up anytime that is convenient to you '. That was pretty much the nicest thing she said to me, dispite I made my preference dead clear to her already and had to reiterate - post to me.

Due to her unprofessionalism actions, I felt the need to ask her to distory the personal detail I left to her after she finished using it to process online link, as my right under personal data protection . But every time I tried to speak, she talked over me. I had to say, 'can I please finish', for her to stop her loudly talking over me.

I have raised a formal complain to Hermes. I respect their payment policy but I am against how badly I was treated, it was about what the cashier said to me and how she said them. I am suspending any shopping with Hermes at the mean time.
I won't go into all the points raised in your post HOWEVER as someone who works in retail I have to say that you were in the wrong expecting them to accept you paying with your husbands card irrespective of wether you had the pin or not.
If the card was in your husbands name (ie: stated MR.XXXXX) it cannot be accepted unless in the possession of the person named on the card and used as payment by them.
Also regarding sending you the link to pay-where I work we are unable to do those sort of remote payment links for 'click and collect' type transactions unless the client is a regular and known to us personally, So it seems a little odd that the SA who clearly didn't know you as regular client was happy to let you pay by remote link and collect later in store.
I suspect that the cashier saw as a red flag the fact that from what I understand you processed an online transaction in store (why didn't you just do it online yourself?)then went on to try and purchase something else in the store using the same card which when she checked wasn't in your name.
I think she was in the right and original SA (perhaps desperate to make a sale) was in the wrong.
 
Last edited:
I don’t think she was assuming there was fraud or framing you negatively, she was explaining the reason she could not use that card — it is because of fraud reasons. That is not unique to you, it is the reason they have the policy for everyone, and it’s unrelated to purchase history. I don’t think she could have known that your husband was just outside.

I agree here. Rules are put into place for protection.
While the situation escalated in a very unpleasant manner & since Fan2020's husband was sitting
outside this could have been rectified easily.
I don't blame H here.. perhaps the tone of the cashier could have been more professional
 
Top