This. Absolutely. People figured that this kind of thing gets attention - and if anything is important these days, it is online attention, going viral etc etc.
There are of course rich people who buy fake and live
their best life. Whatever.
There are entire stores that sell dubious designer bags/apparel, and do it - 'till they get caught.
There is a lot of money to be made, and it's made by fraud. The only reason why fakes are not taken seriously (apart from in countries where it is like France) is that fashion is seen as frippery, only
silly women are effected, and only those who are silly (fashion-vicims anyway) would want to spend 'that' kind of money on things to wear.
But, I absolutely refuse to see it as a new cultural trend (it's not, people have been buying fake everything since the beginning of time, even food was faked and adulterated) a blow for inequality (since the emphasis is
still on material things and capitalism) a redressing of the balance between brands/consumers (brands don't care unless it affects
their business/customers). They are certainly not bargains. A designer/brand reseller's business lives and dies by their reputation, as do auction houses, authentication software companies and anyone involved in the pre-loved market.
The evils of fakery, as
@880 has written, are debatable, but it's probably less socially acceptable nowadays (certainly the social circles I know) because fakes are seen as big business too and not the choice of the underdog championing the underdog. With so much choice for pre-loved and vintage authentic, contemporary, there really is no excuse to be knowing carrying a fake and passing it off (or not) as real.
Anyone bragging they buy fake and sell as real (on record by 'Cindy' "stay-at-home mom in Flushing" which is what Singh-Kurtz has written) is breaking the law - even in the US, unlike "personal use" (Douglas Hand), misrepresenting and defrauding in business practice. Faced with that, S-K should be reporting a crime, not telling the world about it and passing it off as a coup.
I'm also not going to get into it now, but cultural appropriation, racism and sexism runs through the article, at once that actually make the stereotyping of 'those kinds of people' more believable, but for me, set off a whole host of warning signals, Sangeeta Singh-Kurtz poses as a journalist but authentic journalists should know better.