Doesn't look the price. It is heavy, yes. But lacks elegance and character.We did have our doubts about the THIN version - I have a thin LOVE and if this Sweet is closer to that size, IMHO, it will not be worth USD16K.
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Doesn't look the price. It is heavy, yes. But lacks elegance and character.We did have our doubts about the THIN version - I have a thin LOVE and if this Sweet is closer to that size, IMHO, it will not be worth USD16K.
I checked them out but I didn't like them all. Look cheap. The clovers are undistinquishable... look more like blobs...Tried different combos on. Maybe next time I go I'll try them with my pave loves but I find them very underwhelming at first sight. They do look better in photos than in rl. Ugh...
View attachment 5104330
I like the single row diamonds a lot. It is exquisite. The problem with the new thin perlee is that the diamonds on top are without defined edges like in the original clover but they are very sparkly so what you see is a shapeless blob of light. They could have just had round shape like a Button d 'or instead and it would not have had any difference. In the original clover they are surrounded by metal so the clover shape pops.Thank you for your photos. I really wanted a thin to wear with my YG perlee pave bracelet as I don't like two thick ones stacked.
For the price I am not sure if this is the one. I may go for the signature or single row pave instead.
That’s a very good and acute observation. I didn’t notice that from the pics and haven’t gone to preview these myself yet. I thought the big problem for me was that the clovers extended too far out and interrupts the pearling borders. Thank you. I will look out for that point when I try them on.I like the single row diamonds a lot. It is exquisite. The problem with the new thin perlee is that the diamonds on top are without defined edges like in the original clover but they are very sparkly so what you see is a shapeless blob of light. They could have just had round shape like a Button d 'or instead and it would not have had any difference. In the original clover they are surrounded by metal so the clover shape pops.
They look better and are more noticeable in the pics than in reality.That’s a very good and acute observation. I didn’t notice that from the pics and haven’t gone to preview these myself yet. I thought the big problem for me was that the clovers extended too far out and interrupts the pearling borders. Thank you. I will look out for that point when I try them on.
Did you consider messika move romane (pave or non pave) bangle? I don’t know how good they would stack together with clover but I think it would stack well with perlee pave. Messika move romane is the only bangle I would love to buy in future and I am someone that doesn’t wear any bracelet because I hate the weight on my wrist but this bracelet is just too beautiful (atleast to me)Thank you for your photos. I really wanted a thin to wear with my YG perlee pave bracelet as I don't like two thick ones stacked.
For the price I am not sure if this is the one. I may go for the signature or single row pave instead.
Can you share?My SP sent me pics of two stacked with Onyx Vintage Alhambra. It was fabulous and I put deposit down for one
Don't sugar coat. I love your honesty as it's helps people see a different point of view. We are all big enough to know it's not personal, it's preference.Thank you. I was wondering if I should have sugar-coated/filtered my opinion but I was trully disappointed. Maybe my expectatios were too high.
I will need to ask his permission to post on public forum.Can you share?
There is a photo for you then. I took this one really close with the macro for more detail! This is the YG one.I'm in the minority here but I'm pretty excited about the new thin. I plan to wear it as pictured here but with yellow gold.