Prince Harry and Meghan Markle thread

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I kindly request that all members participating in the MM and Harry thread dial back the vile rhetoric.

I am not opposed to discussing public personas on TPF, including the constant torrent of news surrounding the couple from this thread. But I find it troubling when their looks are being nitpicked apart to a degree that is just not appropriate.

This thread has drawn criticism over the years, and I discussed it at great length with Megs and the mods. I am not looking to close it down, but the vitriol needs to be dialed back.

My personal feelings about hate threads aside, this ultra-negative vibe is something better suited for other forums, Reddit, or elsewhere. I am holding our community to higher standards.

Thanks for reading.
 
Reddit is saying today The Telegraph changed it original story. What is going on? Idk. :shrugs:

Yesterday’s story included this line:
One royal source suggested that while the exchange was warm in tone, it had not eased the tension between the two sides.

today’s story changed the line above to:
However, it is understood that she does still consider the comment to be racist.
Someone got cold feet.
 
I think they are going to use married in members of extended family to issue the comments of reason. Mike Tindall and Camilla's son are perfect. Meghan has had no dealings with these people really, so it would be interesting to see if she claps back at them.

BTW, did anyone notice how Camilla scooted off after Easter services? They said she was going to a private engagement. I translate that to her spending Easter with her children and grandkids. The Wales and KC were locked into something at the home of the Head of St George's.
Idea Volunteer GIF


Yes, I did notice. Certainly possible that indeed she was going to her grandkids’ party, not sure why they couldn’t attend this service, but ok.

My thought was she did not want to walk up the hill. She does have osteoporosis or osteoarthritis, so that walk may have been a bit ambitious. The Roller did pick her up.
 
Last edited:
Idea Volunteer GIF


Yes, I did notice. Certainly possible that indeed she was going to her grandkids’ party, not sure why they couldn’t attend this service, but ok.

My thought was she did not want to walk up the hill. She does have osteoporosis or osteoarthritis, so that walk may have been a bit ambitious. The Roller did pick her up.
Personally I think she is still struggling after her second bout of covid she doesn’t seem to have got her strength back fully
 
hate to appear to defend her but she didn't invite any white relatives either - even the uncle who got her a job at an embassy. wonder what made his undesirable.....maybe she felt should couldn't have him when she wasn't having her own father

:nuke: did not want all her lies stories to be exploded over the wine and nibbles - one family to another.

walterscott1.jpeg
 
Reddit is saying today The Telegraph changed it original story. What is going on? Idk. :shrugs:

Yesterday’s story included this line:
One royal source suggested that while the exchange was warm in tone, it had not eased the tension between the two sides.

today’s story changed the line above to:
However, it is understood that she does still consider the comment to be racist.


…. Look at the paragraph above where she said it wasn’’t intended to accuse a person of being racist. She can’t decide if it’s racist or unconscious bias.

Her PR needs a clear strategy and shows its still amateur hour when she is in control. She leaks the letter to the Telegraph. Gets the backlash and eye rolling from everywhere.

Then leaks to page six that “she has moved on.”

She moved on in 24 hours? because the response to the Telegraph was not in her favour… again.

MM needs to stop striking back at every perceived slight. It just shows how immature she is.

What stunt do we expect for the coronation day? I say she will

  1. leak the name of the racist (which the Telegraph would know if they have a copy of her letter; or
  2. leak a photo of her two kids or the birthday party; or
  3. pap walk; or
  4. divorce / separation announcement
These are on my bingo card… Any other suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Isn’t the whole racism/Archie’s skin colour debate heresay anyway?
Verbatim transcript from Oprah interview:
IMG_2453.jpegIMG_2454.jpegIMG_2455.jpegIMG_2456.jpegIMG_2457.jpeg
I didn’t watch the “Harry and Meghan” interview but did Harry speak at all, or was it just Meghan blathering on and on and on and on and on and on and on……
 
Isn’t the whole racism/Archie’s skin colour debate heresay anyway?
Verbatim transcript from Oprah interview:
View attachment 5768106View attachment 5768107View attachment 5768108View attachment 5768109View attachment 5768110
I didn’t watch the “Harry and Meghan” interview but did Harry speak at all, or was it just Meghan blathering on and on and on and on and on and on and on……
Sounds like she is conflating two separate conversations. the reason that the kids were not given titles was not race but rather their status as great grand children. she is still upset they aren’t being treated like the Waleses. Bc H is no longer the Spare, and they are further in the LoS. Not sure why she cannot understand this, but I certainly also have family members who cannot understand reality. I’m sure that we all do lol.

ETA : I have not caught up on reading the thread, but it doesn’t sound like KC ever wrote a letter
 
Last edited:
That line was in the original story…. Look at the paragraph above where she said it wasn’’t intended to accuse a person of being racist. She can’t decide if it’s racist or unconscious bias.

Her PR needs a clear strategy and shows its still amateur hour when she is in control. She leaks the letter to the Telegraph. Gets the backlash and eye rolling from everywhere.

Then leaks to page six that “she has moved on.”

She moved on in 24 hours? because the response to the Telegraph was not in her favour… again.

MM needs to stop striking back at every perceived slight. It just shows how immature she is.

What stunt do we expect for the coronation day? I say she will

  1. leak the name of the racist (which the Telegraph would know if they have a copy of her letter; or
  2. leak a photo of her two kids or the birthday party; or
  3. pap walk; or
  4. divorce / separation announcement
These are on my bingo card… Any other suggestions?
5. She shows up, demands a tiara and front row seating. :bagslap: Take that, world.
 
Reddit is saying today The Telegraph changed it original story. What is going on? Idk. :shrugs:

Yesterday’s story included this line:
One royal source suggested that while the exchange was warm in tone, it had not eased the tension between the two sides.

today’s story changed the line above to:
However, it is understood that she does still consider the comment to be racist.

And lest we forget the chronology
1. OW prime time interview had the clear insinuation of racism over baby skin
2. In an OUTTAKE from interview, aired the next morning BUT no one saw it at the time, H says there was no racism
OW edited her interview so as to let stand the claim of racism, without the retraction, OW is as complicit in this mess as anyone
and what 2-3 years later, the leaks are still about the non-racism racism ???? Someone just cant let go …
Munchhausen’s syndrome is where you get all worked up about nothing
 
Sounds like she is conflating two separate conversations. the reason that the kids were not given titles was not race but rather their status as great grand children. she is still upset they aren’t being treated like the Waleses. Bc H is no longer the Spare, and they are further in the LoS. Not sure why she cannot understand this, but I certainly also have family members who cannot understand reality. I’m sure that we all do lol.
The funny thing is, earlier in that conversation with Oprah, she specifically said she knew Archie would have the title of Prince once Charles became King. She had to know it would only be a matter of 3-4 years until that happened - the Queen was 93 when Archie was born. Yet she just kept going round and round about Archie receiving “security”. Like, security for/from what? I don’t get it. Archie was six months old when they defected under the cover of night to Vancouver Island. What kind of security does a six, twelve, or twenty-four month for that matter require? Seriously, William and Catherine take their children to public parks.
 
I think they are going to use married in members of extended family to issue the comments of reason. Mike Tindall and Camilla's son are perfect. Meghan has had no dealings with these people really, so it would be interesting to see if she claps back at them.

Oh, I think the narc knows better than to tickle the Tindalls the wrong way. I think Zara can be scarier than Anne.
 
hate to appear to defend her but she didn't invite any white relatives either - even the uncle who got her a job at an embassy. wonder what made him undesirable.....maybe she felt should couldn't have him when she wasn't having her own father
I think it is safe to say that she didn't invite anyone who couldn't do something for her. Plus her relatives of any color did not have enough "class" for her. Her father didn't look like he came out of the movie Father of the Bride as well. Doing the right thing was never in her vocabulary of human interactions.
 
Top