Prince Harry and Meghan Markle thread

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

#172,786
I kindly request that all members participating in the MM and Harry thread dial back the vile rhetoric.

I am not opposed to discussing public personas on TPF, including the constant torrent of news surrounding the couple from this thread. But I find it troubling when their looks are being nitpicked apart to a degree that is just not appropriate.

This thread has drawn criticism over the years, and I discussed it at great length with Megs and the mods. I am not looking to close it down, but the vitriol needs to be dialed back.

My personal feelings about hate threads aside, this ultra-negative vibe is something better suited for other forums, Reddit, or elsewhere. I am holding our community to higher standards.

Thanks for reading.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Thanks
Reactions: Charles, keishapie1973, bubablu and 108 others
#141,136
QueenofWrapDress said:
Dark, but I wonder if some members of the BRF secretly wish for her to be hit by a car or struck by a meteorite. The destruction won't end. I as a total bystander am exhausted by the vicious attacks that. Just. Won't. Stop. All because they didn't hand a certified nutjob with a massive evil streak the throne and the key to the jewelry vault.
Click to expand...
THIS!
They are exhaustingly tedious and predictable.

Expect Prince Merchie and Princess Lilibucks pictures soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: piperdog, googlewhack, Hermes Zen and 7 others
#141,137
purseinsanity said:
I suspect Camilla's son might speak up a bit more soon too. He's not technically a royal, but part of the BRF regardless and I think he has much more leeway to say things. I can't blame him for defending his mother, especially against his snively frozen todgered step brother.
Click to expand...

Just as Mike. He is not in the center of the family and also his attitude is a bit more down to earth and couldn't care less. I thought what Tom said was mild and not out of line at all. He'd been standing by watching the jerks slander his mother for years now.
 
  • Like
  • Insightful
Reactions: MiniMabel, googlewhack, eon and 16 others
#141,141
QueenofWrapDress said:
Dark, but I wonder if some members of the BRF secretly wish for her to be hit by a car or struck by a meteorite. The destruction won't end. I as a total bystander am exhausted by the vicious attacks that. Just. Won't. Stop. All because they didn't hand a certified nutjob with a massive evil streak the throne and the key to the jewelry vault.
Click to expand...
Anything anyone does that does not succumb to Crazy’s way is going to be either racist or unconscious bias.
 
  • Like
  • Thanks
  • Insightful
Reactions: googlewhack, queennadine, duna and 9 others
#141,146
purseinsanity said:
I suspect Camilla's son might speak up a bit more soon too. He's not technically a royal, but part of the BRF regardless and I think he has much more leeway to say things. I can't blame him for defending his mother, especially against his snively frozen todgered step brother.
Click to expand...
I think they are going to use married in members of extended family to issue the comments of reason. Mike Tindall and Camilla's son are perfect. Meghan has had no dealings with these people really, so it would be interesting to see if she claps back at them.

BTW, did anyone notice how Camilla scooted off after Easter services? They said she was going to a private engagement. I translate that to her spending Easter with her children and grandkids. The Wales and KC were locked into something at the home of the Head of St George's.
 
  • Like
  • Insightful
Reactions: Hermes Zen, EverSoElusive, etudes and 7 others
#141,148
Chanbal said:
Is the journalist friend of the Harkles at the Telegraph being markled? :lol:

Click to expand...


:whut: Can we just get.the dynamics on this statement?

“Yes, there was correspondence, there were letters back & forth from the Duchess of Sussex to the king”
Click to expand...

back & forth
Click to expand...

Means 2 ways <> ><

from the Duchess of Sussex to the king
Click to expand...

Means one way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Correspondence, suggests two-ways, but one suggests desperate crazzzzzzy person that couldn't get through on the phone :cray: :panic:

Oh and as far as I know the 'king' is the King coz he's not (just) a king.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Thanks
Reactions: WingNut, skyqueen, googlewhack and 14 others
#141,149
papertiger said:
Can we just get.the dynamics on this statement





Means 2 ways <> ><



Means one way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Correspondence, suggests two-ways, but one was suggests desperate crazy person that couldn't get through on the phone

Oh and as far as I know the 'king' is the King coz he's not (just) a king.
Click to expand...
That is my thought. She wrote him and he did not write her in return. He put them in what my father used to call the circular file :)
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: WingNut, skyqueen, kemilia and 11 others
#141,150
Reddit is saying today The Telegraph changed it original story. What is going on? Idk. :shrugs:

Yesterday’s story included this line:
One royal source suggested that while the exchange was warm in tone, it had not eased the tension between the two sides.

today’s story changed the line above to:
However, it is understood that she does still consider the comment to be racist.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: WingNut, Pivoine66, Hermes Zen and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top