Please vote on my ering setting!

Which setting?

  • With out a halo

  • With tiny halo

  • neither - get something else

Results are only viewable after voting.

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

itsonly4me

itsonly4me

Oskar Waltz
O.G.
May 8, 2007
8,560
10
#1
Ok so I *think* I have found the setting that I want. I have been all over the place with what I like. I originally thought I wanted a super thin pave setting, then maybe side stones and then a halo and now, I just cant decide!

I fell in love with tacori and this is my fav out of all of them. Now what makes it difficult is they have the same setting either plain or with a super tiny halo. Please tell me which one you think looks better. Keep in mind the halo one is too small for me and makes me have sausage fingers.

The halo is also a cushion shaped halo so it makes my stone look more like a cushion than a round.

FYI - My stone is a little larger than the one shown but not by much.

Thank you!

So your options are:
1. 2510 - setting with no halo

http://www.tacori.com/Engagement-Rings#/HT251012X

2. 2515 - setting with tiny halo

http://www.tacori.com/Engagement-Rings/HT2515RD812X#/HT2515RD812X


3. Neither find something else.


Heres the one without the halo:

photo1-4.jpg


With a halo:

photo2-4.jpg
 
#5
I'm all about Tacori! And I'm fully about halos! Being that my setting is a tacori micropave halo!...

BUT!!! in this setting style I like it without the halo.

Had it had a thinner shank or a different style I would have said to halo it because it is so signature Tacori to have one! The halo and the large shank just make it really mixed and too busy.

IF you are fully set on a halo I would explore the simply tacori or dantela collections. However, i LOVE the crescents without the halo.
 
#11
If the halo was a teeeny weeeny more noticeable, I'd say GO FOR IT.

But in this case, the halo detracts from the centre stone in my opinion.

Can you choose another halo style? I do love Halos!
 
#14
Contessa said:
If the halo was a teeeny weeeny more noticeable, I'd say GO FOR IT.

But in this case, the halo detracts from the centre stone in my opinion.

Can you choose another halo style? I do love Halos!
Click to expand...

I know what you mean... but I really love the channel set stones on the side of this setting so I dont think another halo design is for me. Even though every time I look at yours or whoops setting I double guess myself!

skyqueen said:
While both are gorgeouse...I prefer no halo.
But as La Contessa posted, maybe a different halo.
Click to expand...

Thanks skyqueen - its so hard for me to choose!

whoops said:
Here are alternative Tacori Halos that are cushion shaped for round stones with side pave for your consideration if you are intent on a cushion shaped halo:

http://www.topperjewelers.com/engagement_rings/tacori/2627RDLG

http://www.topperjewelers.com/engagement_rings/tacori/2620RDLGP

http://www.topperjewelers.com/engagement_rings/tacori/2628RDP
Click to expand...

Thanks whoops - I think I am in love with this setting so other halos are out.
 
#15
itsonly4me said:
I know what you mean... but I really love the channel set stones on the side of this setting so I dont think another halo design is for me.
Click to expand...

In that case it's a fabulous ring on it's own and I say get it! The matching band even looks great on it. You don't need the halo to show that it's a beautiful ring! Congratz! Tacori *swoon*

Also, careful for the side pave on the crescent collection I know before they had quality issues with it but not sure if it applies anymore?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top