TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
maybe I should study up on this....I never like photos of meIt seems like almost all really famous people do that. It must photograph better, but it never looks as genuine.
maybe I should study up on this....I never like photos of me
no selfies for meSame. Especially selfies.
I agree she wasn't glamorous by any means in those films but I've never seen her looking beat up and old. This movie has got good reviews at Rotten Tomatoes, supposed to be released on Christmas.She was stripped down, looks wise in Lion as well. Also in The Hours and Rabbit Hole.
Totally agree - bad photo of both of them. Definitely NOT a look to encourage women and power. It actually makes me angry that they chose this, it's not a trivial issue.What an awful cover photo. Because it's very, very serious and not a fashion shoot they had to pose the women like they are lined up in front of a firing squad?
Nicole is gorgeous, but she's blending in the background. This picture doesn't talk about power.New York Magazine “Powerful Women Talk About Power”
View attachment 4227817 View attachment 4227818
source: twitter
My point was there is a way to photograph a woman without dolling her up like a peacock that does not mean making her look angry, scared, frail, and disenfranchised. Nicole looks like she just got out of 72 hours of torture and interrogation and her captors took a photo of her to prove she's still alive.To me that’s the whole point. It shouldn’t matter what they are wearing. When you see men on the cover of magazines they aren’t all dolled up like peacocks. The person matters. Not what they look like