Michael Fassbender
- Thread starter Swanky
- Start date
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
And clearly Michael can't resist Alicia - still going strong 2 years on! [emoji2][emoji7]
looks like Alicia's worth is bases solely on what Michael thinks of her. Thank god for a man to think the girl isnt bland. Or else what in the world would she do.
2 years isnt a long time to be in a relationship at all but it is worth a lot by Hollywood standards.
2 years isnt a long time to be in a relationship at all but it is worth a lot by Hollywood standards.
Ya ! 2 years already ! Nature of force is so powerful!
Talking about prediction, Michael "predicts " it two years ago that he needs to date Alicia immediately on October 2014 in order to boost his Oscar chance in feb 2016 as well as TLBO September 2016 or even Oscar 2017 ! He is according to some has such ability.
Lol this is Alicia Vikander right? Guess she would just go back to her boring day job..actress, model, whatever.
2 yrs is a good start to a relationship. Although I thought they where supposed to be finished last April, then the summer, then January, then after TLBO release and now it's apparently after awards season. My they are some mighty moveable goal posts!
2 yrs is a good start to a relationship. Although I thought they where supposed to be finished last April, then the summer, then January, then after TLBO release and now it's apparently after awards season. My they are some mighty moveable goal posts!
When the "prediction" is solely concerned with Michael's intentions surely his opinion of Alicia is all that is relevant...Right?
And 2 years demonstrates a strong solid relationship ...one that has the potential to last for 20 or longer...Right?
And 2 years demonstrates a strong solid relationship ...one that has the potential to last for 20 or longer...Right?
Look, we're all bored with this, but I maintain that "eminent" for "imminent" is the blog editor's mistake. Why? Because when someone misspeaks, and it is taken down as he said it, then the editor will put "sic"--as in, "MF says it's a feeling of eminent (sic) disaster." Without the (sic) it means the editor (and author) thought eminent was just fine--and that's the word they heard, not necessarily the word he said.
If we have such moving targets in our IT capacity building projects , we will get scolded left right centre !
Ah but you're talking about the real world, not an environment where bizarre theories are presented as credible!!
I predict they will get married in 18 months. [emoji177][emoji1][emoji3][emoji38][emoji13]
Taking about the real world real human and as a responsible stakeholder wearing corporate hat! [emoji57][emoji11][emoji9]
I read this a week or so ago and it said imminent. Was just shocked the editors mistake was highlighted on here to some how imply Michael has a problem articulating what he wants to say.
Nah. He's in deep now with her PR. She will hang onto him for awhile. They will probably split after Tomb Raider bombs.
Lol and the goal posts shift yet again.
I call it "rollover upon maturity " - you know like fixed deposit .....