Yes! Be ready for good and bad and good and bad and good and bad.
Like with any other film.. I'm not very worried about it, it's routine.
Do you remember SJ? Macbeth?
I mean some people said Fassbender wasn't even good in SJ, others said Kutcher's version was better, others adored it. With Macbeth they had problems with chemistry between Cotillard and Fassbender, then some praised it, some other thought the movie was a meaningless bore -it's Shakespeare, you can't expect to have 'fun', just take it as a Shakespearean adaptation!-, not to mention Shame, which some people considered almost "ridiculous" (I still have that Italian video interview of a famous critic criticising the movie.... :/ and I didn't agree) and 12YAS.
It's a matter of perception, apart from the acting/cinematography/directing part, which it's easier to define in a more "universal" way. But again it's a matter of tastes.
That's why I read and post reviews for those who asked, but I'm not really interested in them for myself (they don't affect my opinion: I loved Oceans 12 in spite of the bad reviews and hated Bright Star in spite of the good ones..).
Important critics' reviews, tho, matter for awards season.. [emoji6]