Michael Fassbender

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

"I have to say, this ‘Alien[:Covenant]’ is going to be – I’m really excited to see it and everybody in the film was saying that there’s a film that we all wanna see, it’s much scarier than ‘Prometheus,’ but it’s got that sort of same scope as ‘Prometheus,’ that imminent sort of disaster feel, that ‘Alien’ had" .
This is what Fassbender said. What is the embarrassment about? Did he upload the http address and post himself or something? :confused1:
 
Last edited:
It's been a long while since I read TLBO but I don't recall the age gap per se playing a significant part in the respective character development... My impression was it was their life experience that had a significant impact - Tom was old beyond his years psychologically because of what he experienced and witnessed in WW1 . Isabel had experience of the consequence of war but not the physical reality of it. Thus their characters were shaped not so much by their ages but their experience.

Agree agree agree :) but I think their respective age (more than age gap itself) plays a relevant role in some moments: it explains some of their actions and behaviour (and it also explains their different experiences) and it scares Tom a bit at the beginning, when she kinda asks him out and to marry her. He sees she's very young and naive and that's what attracts him to her first.. Right? Obviously not just this! This I just one thing.
They're different beyond almost every aspect and that's why they're better together IMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: pearlyqueen
"I have to say, this ‘Alien[:Covenant]’ is going to be – I’m really excited to see it and everybody in the film was saying that there’s a film that we all wanna see, it’s much scarier than ‘Prometheus,’ but it’s got that sort of same scope as ‘Prometheus,’ that imminent sort of disaster feel, that ‘Alien’ had" .
This is what Fassbender said. What is the embarrassment about? Did he upload the http address and post himself of something? :confused1:

Excited too and already scared to death. [emoji1316][emoji1316][emoji1316]
 
Agree agree agree :) but I think their respective age (more than age gap itself) plays a relevant role in some moments: it explains some of their actions and behaviour (and it also explains their different experiences) and it scares Tom a bit at the beginning, when she kinda asks him out and to marry her. He sees she's very young and naive and that's what attracts him to her first.. Right? Obviously not just this! This I just one thing.
They're different beyond almost every aspect and that's why they're better together IMO

Yes - agreed. Isabel is younger and more naive but I don't think she was deemed to be significantly younger, so much so that the age gap needed to be explained. Had the war experience not scarred Tom he would doubtless have been much more similar in his approach to life as Isabel.
 
Yes - agreed. Isabel is younger and more naive but I don't think she was deemed to be significantly younger, so much so that the age gap needed to be explained. Had the war experience not scarred Tom he would doubtless have been much more similar in his approach to life as Isabel.

The different approach to life sparks the drama. If they are of same old souls, thinking about the same about life - then what ? I supposed they will reach 100% consensus and then report the incident to the authority gladly ........and end of story. Audience can go back home after 30 minutes as the movie ends there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Just Askin
The "eminent disaster" headline has now been corrected to "imminent." A commenter pointed it out, too. It is obviously the fault of the online blog--even if someone misspeaks, the editor needs to clean it up. I doubt if he misspoke, frankly, given his interviews (of which I've read and seen quite a few!)
LMAO I don't. He's used "nourishing" instead of "nurturing" before, for example. He makes those kind of homophonic mistakes quite frequently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Esizzle
The "eminent disaster" headline has now been corrected to "imminent." A commenter pointed it out, too. It is obviously the fault of the online blog--even if someone misspeaks, the editor needs to clean it up. I doubt if he misspoke, frankly, given his interviews (of which I've read and seen quite a few!)

Thanks for sharing. Anyway Damaged done (a bit ) . Some see this like sharks smell blood and then spreading rumors that Michael failed in his English
 
Thanks for sharing. Anyway Damaged done (a bit ) . Some see this like sharks smell blood and then spreading rumors that Michael failed in his English

Blood in the water? Is commenting on a verbal flub really that critical or over the top? Cate Blanchett also misused a word during her Oscar acceptance speech ("exacerbates") on a way more public stage and I noticed and commented on it on other sites. Sometimes I flub myself and I generally like to be called out on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kashlo and Esizzle
LMAO I don't. He's used "nourishing" instead of "nurturing" before, for example. He makes those kind of homophonic mistakes quite frequently.

As I said previously I haven't noticed him particularly making these mistakes you refer to.

I don't know the context of him using nourish instead of nurture so can't comment specifically. However, the two words have much similarity and whilst nourish is commonly used in connection with food it can be used in the same way as nurture:IMG_1472511785.121214.jpg

Alternatively is it possible he was using the word in a metaphorical way?
 
LMAO I don't. He's used "nourishing" instead of "nurturing" before, for example. He makes those kind of homophonic mistakes quite frequently.
Really? When did he say that? Funny considering he could handle Macbeth as well as the Steve Jobs script so well. Both pieces I would assume to take quite a good grasp on the English language. Are you sure it was him making the mistakes?
 
This is the best one from that particular photoset. Should have been used for the story.
My favorite is the EW shoot,but I agree. This is the best one from the LA Times interview/story.


No, agreed--some negative reviews are good, and everything resonates differently with different people. I'd rather hear from critics though. When does the embargo lift again, tomorrow?
This is absolutely true. And I'm sure this story is not everyone's cup of tea. I totally expect mixed reviews for this particular reason,above all if I think about certain publications. In any case,even highly praised film always have its detractors (American and European critics). If we're talking about recent Oscar winners or frontrunners,12 YAS and Boyhood are perfect examples. But I like to read well-written reviews,even if I don't agree.

Yes! Be ready for good and bad and good and bad and good and bad.
Like with any other film.. I'm not very worried about it, it's routine.
Do you remember SJ? Macbeth?
I mean some people said Fassbender wasn't even good in SJ, others said Kutcher's version was better, others adored it. With Macbeth they had problems with chemistry between Cotillard and Fassbender, then some praised it, some other thought the movie was a meaningless bore -it's Shakespeare, you can't expect to have 'fun', just take it as a Shakespearean adaptation!-, not to mention Shame, which some people considered almost "ridiculous" (I still have that Italian video interview of a famous critic criticising the movie.... :/ and I didn't agree) and 12YAS.
It's a matter of perception, apart from the acting/cinematography/directing part, which it's easier to define in a more "universal" way. But again it's a matter of tastes.
That's why I read and post reviews for those who asked, but I'm not really interested in them for myself (they don't affect my opinion: I loved Oceans 12 in spite of the bad reviews and hated Bright Star in spite of the good ones..).

Important critics' reviews, tho, matter for awards season.. [emoji6]
Actually,I've never read any critic saying that..:p SJ was well received,but his performance was unanimously praised despite some criticism about the script or direction.

Oh God, this is embarrassing. I hope that's a transcription error in the title, but I have a feeling its not.

http://theplaylist.net/michael-fass...ll-eminent-sort-disaster-feel-alien-20160829/
I see that they've already corrected it. I think it's just a transcription error.

As a member had stated earlier, if Cianfrance did not make it clear through the writing of the film that the age gap is significant part of the character's development, then that's more of a problem with the film than the fact that a critic or multiple critics did not read the book. Audiences shouldn't be expected to have read a book before viewing a movie based on it in order to understand certain things like that. There's nothing wrong with the age gap itself (I'm personally not offended by it at all, especially when they're 10 or so years apart both in the movie and in real life), but I can see how some may not see it that way if the film doesn't make it clear why that particular gap is integral to the story. Plus, one negative review doesn't mean anything, so I'm reserving any hard judgement for now until I actually see it. However, that reviewer does bring up a good point in the sexism re: casting in Hollywood, and I could see why they may think the "older man/younger woman" pairing is cliche as it has been done to death in a way, even if it is based on a book.
I've never read anyone complaining about the age gap,and I'm not only talking about what has been posted in this thread. That looks like a superficial observation based on the abused (it's absolutely true) "older man /younger woman" pairing. I'd wait to blame Cianfrance.
 
Last edited:
Top