There is a big difference between being motivated by $$$ and making money on your projects to succeed in the film industry.No dear, not a direct comparison. The metaphor was in the art for art's sake rather than being motivated by $$$$$$.
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
There is a big difference between being motivated by $$$ and making money on your projects to succeed in the film industry.No dear, not a direct comparison. The metaphor was in the art for art's sake rather than being motivated by $$$$$$.
Really? Just checked. So again..Really? She used to post a lot but that was surely before you became a member, like way before. Oh well .I hardly see her comments too but when I do it is when there is drama around his relationship. Which is exactly why I mentioned it.
Really? Just checked. So again..Really? She used to post a lot but that was surely before you became a member, like way before. Oh well .
There is a big difference between being motivated by $$$ and making money on your projects to succeed in the film industry.
On the contrary, I've seen people (not necessarily here, but more elsewhere) be quite critical about James and his career path, with some of his major fans even getting very defensive about it. About Michael, the people commenting about his career path (in I suppose what some posters here view in a "negative" way) are not necessarily alone in their perspectives, as I've seen similar comments in other places.It's kind of interesting to see how people commenting on James' recent career and comparing with the comments about Michael's and predicting the future of Michael career trajectory, I feel people go very easy on James but too hard on Michael. I don't know why. James career now is not as good as Michael's, yet people are more worried about Michael's. I guess maybe it's like "you care more so you are worried more" that sort of thing?
You wouldn't think so with the focus on some of the posts here...doom and gloom projections about AC, based on what? Filmmakers have great admiration and respect for Michael based on his talent as an actor, that's what he's hired to do - act - and he always delivers. If the film ultimately falls short at the box office it's not due to him not delivering. And I think it's fairly obvious he chooses his roles based on what he finds interesting, not to wear a celebrity crown or guarantee blockbuster ticket sales.
Oh yeah..you did say before, sorry lollllllllI like many people used to lurk before I joined. I'm sure we have talked about that before but you seem perplexed by the idea.
His performance is always top notch. He is a producer on AC and needs to make sure the movie makes back money. Part of it is profits for the producing companies and part of it is finance for the sequels. His job as an actor is now over since principal photography is done. However as the lead star and producer, his responsibility to promote the movie heavily still stands. Its not a small genre movie like TLBO. Blockbusters are expected to make money and Michael signed up for one.You wouldn't think so with the focus on some of the posts here...doom and gloom projections about AC, based on what? Filmmakers have great admiration and respect for Michael based on his talent as an actor, that's what he's hired to do - act - and he always delivers. If the film ultimately falls short at the box office it's not due to him not delivering. And I think it's fairly obvious he chooses his roles based on what he finds interesting, not to wear a celebrity crown or guarantee blockbuster ticket sales.
Seriously? He is producing that film so of course people are going to talk about the BO performance. It is really important for him as a producer for that film to do well. It isn't a criticism of his talent as an actor. I don't think that was ever in question.
You'll be aware then that he is one of several producers on AC, he's worked really hard on it and is very excited about it. I don't pretend to know what kind of financial projections are involved but do recall reading that the company behind it weren't expecting it to smash the box office. And as you've been lurking here for a while you'll be aware that some posters have a very keen interest in the box office figures for all his films, not just those he's producing.
The finest words spoken to perfection...
Discussing BO is part of Michael's career which is allowed on this forum.I don't understand what you are trying to say with the first part of your post. And even if people were interested in the BO figures for all his films I don't think that is a bad thing. I know there is one person on tumblr who seems to think BO is the be all and end all but I don't think we should take her seriously. I haven't seen anyone here having unreasonable expectations in terms of BO.